Watch Donald Trump AG Bill Barr Get Busted For Upstaging Mueller | The Beat With Ari Melber | MSNBC

Watch Donald Trump AG Bill Barr Get Busted For Upstaging Mueller | The Beat With Ari Melber | MSNBC


GET PUBLIC ATTENTION FOR WHAT TO DO NEXT. DO NEXT. THE DIRECTOR OF THAT VERY VIDEO THE DIRECTOR OF THAT VERY VIDEO JOINS ME LATER THIS HOUR, ROB JOINS ME LATER THIS HOUR, ROB REINER. REINER.>>>OUR TOP STORY TONIGHT, THE>>>OUR TOP STORY TONIGHT, THE DAY AFTER BOB MUELLER BROKE HIS DAY AFTER BOB MUELLER BROKE HIS SILENCE IS SOMETHING THAT YOU SILENCE IS SOMETHING THAT YOU MAY HAVE SEEN BEFORE. MAY HAVE SEEN BEFORE. IT IS A PATTERN THE TRUMP IT IS A PATTERN THE TRUMP ADMINISTRATION HAS SETTLED ON ADMINISTRATION HAS SETTLED ON WHEN DEALING WITH BOB MUELLER’S WHEN DEALING WITH BOB MUELLER’S SOMETIMES EXPLOSIVE AND NEGATIVE SOMETIMES EXPLOSIVE AND NEGATIVE FINDINGS. FINDINGS. LET ME TELL YOU EXACTLY WHAT LET ME TELL YOU EXACTLY WHAT THIS IS. THIS IS. I CALL IT THE MUELLER SANDWICH. I CALL IT THE MUELLER SANDWICH. LIKE ANY SANDWICH, THE TITLE LIKE ANY SANDWICH, THE TITLE COMES FROM THE MEAT, IN THIS COMES FROM THE MEAT, IN THIS CASE MUELLER. CASE MUELLER. BUT TEAM TRUMP FIGURED OUT A WAY BUT TEAM TRUMP FIGURED OUT A WAY TO BLUNT WHAT THEY MAY VIEW AS TO BLUNT WHAT THEY MAY VIEW AS THE BITTER TASTE OF MUELLER’S THE BITTER TASTE OF MUELLER’S MEATY EVIDENCE BY SANDWICHING MEATY EVIDENCE BY SANDWICHING HIM WITH A LOT OF BARR. HIM WITH A LOT OF BARR. IF YOU REMEMBER, THERE WAS A LOT IF YOU REMEMBER, THERE WAS A LOT OF BARR BEFORE ANY OF THE OF BARR BEFORE ANY OF THE MUELLER REPORT CAME OUT. MUELLER REPORT CAME OUT. THERE WAS MORE BARR DURING THAT THERE WAS MORE BARR DURING THAT UNUSUAL PRESS CONFERENCE TO UNUSUAL PRESS CONFERENCE TO UPSTAGE THE REPORT ON THE VERY UPSTAGE THE REPORT ON THE VERY DAY IT CAME OUT. DAY IT CAME OUT. AND NOW THAT BOB MUELLER HAS AND NOW THAT BOB MUELLER HAS SPOKEN FOR WHAT HE SAYS HE HOPES SPOKEN FOR WHAT HE SAYS HE HOPES TO BE THE LAST TIME, WELL, GUESS TO BE THE LAST TIME, WELL, GUESS WHAT, MUELLER SANDWICH. WHAT, MUELLER SANDWICH. BARR OUT TODAY AGAIN MUDDYING BARR OUT TODAY AGAIN MUDDYING MUELLER’S CAREFUL EXPLANATION OF MUELLER’S CAREFUL EXPLANATION OF HOW THE RULES PROHIBIT INDICTING HOW THE RULES PROHIBIT INDICTING A PRESIDENT BECAUSE, TRUE TO THE A PRESIDENT BECAUSE, TRUE TO THE SANDWICH, BARR IS MAKING HIS OWN SANDWICH, BARR IS MAKING HIS OWN NEWS AND HE IS THE ATTORNEY NEWS AND HE IS THE ATTORNEY GENERAL, SO WHAT HE SAYS GENERAL, SO WHAT HE SAYS MATTERS. MATTERS. HE IS CLAIMING THAT MUELLER HE IS CLAIMING THAT MUELLER COULD HAVE REACHED A DECISION ON COULD HAVE REACHED A DECISION ON THAT VERY INDICTMENT POINT. THAT VERY INDICTMENT POINT.>>I PERSONALLY FELT HE COULD>>I PERSONALLY FELT HE COULD HAVE REACHED A DECISION. HAVE REACHED A DECISION.>>IN YOUR VIEW HE COULD HAVE>>IN YOUR VIEW HE COULD HAVE REACHED A CONCLUSION. REACHED A CONCLUSION.>>RIGHT.>>RIGHT. HE COULD HAVE REACHED A HE COULD HAVE REACHED A CONCLUSION. CONCLUSION. THE OPINION SAYS YOU CAN’T THE OPINION SAYS YOU CAN’T INDICT A PRESIDENT WHILE HE’S IN INDICT A PRESIDENT WHILE HE’S IN OFFICE, BUT HE COULD HAVE OFFICE, BUT HE COULD HAVE REACHED A DECISION AS TO WHETHER REACHED A DECISION AS TO WHETHER IT WAS CRIMINAL ACTIVITY, BUT HE IT WAS CRIMINAL ACTIVITY, BUT HE HAD HIS REASONS FOR NOT DOING HAD HIS REASONS FOR NOT DOING IT, WHICH HE EXPLAINED, AND I’M IT, WHICH HE EXPLAINED, AND I’M NOT GOING TO ARGUE ABOUT THOSE NOT GOING TO ARGUE ABOUT THOSE REASONS. REASONS.>>JUST THINK THROUGH BARR’S>>JUST THINK THROUGH BARR’S CLAIM RIGHT THERE. CLAIM RIGHT THERE. HE’S SAYING HE WOULD PREFER THAT HE’S SAYING HE WOULD PREFER THAT BOB MUELLER CONCLUDE THAT DONALD BOB MUELLER CONCLUDE THAT DONALD TRUMP COMMITTED CRIMINAL TRUMP COMMITTED CRIMINAL ACTIVITY ON OBSTRUCTION WITHOUT ACTIVITY ON OBSTRUCTION WITHOUT INDICTING HIM. INDICTING HIM. HOW CAN I SAY THIS NICELY. HOW CAN I SAY THIS NICELY. THAT’S VERY HARD TO BELIEVE. THAT’S VERY HARD TO BELIEVE. AND ALSO, IF THAT IS WHAT BARR AND ALSO, IF THAT IS WHAT BARR PREFERRED AND DEMANDED, HE COULD PREFERRED AND DEMANDED, HE COULD HAVE DEMANDED IT. HAVE DEMANDED IT. BARR WAS MUELLER’S BOSS UNTIL BARR WAS MUELLER’S BOSS UNTIL YESTERDAY. YESTERDAY. HE COULD ORDER MUELLER TO UPDATE HE COULD ORDER MUELLER TO UPDATE THE REPORT WITH THAT VERY THE REPORT WITH THAT VERY DECISION IF HE WANTED. DECISION IF HE WANTED. HE DIDN’T. HE DIDN’T. HE MADE THE DECISION FOR HE MADE THE DECISION FOR HIMSELF. HIMSELF.>>BUT WHEN HE DIDN’T MAKE A>>BUT WHEN HE DIDN’T MAKE A DECISION, THE DEPUTY ATTORNEY DECISION, THE DEPUTY ATTORNEY GENERAL, ROD ROSENSTEIN, AND I GENERAL, ROD ROSENSTEIN, AND I FELT IT WAS NECESSARY FOR US AS FELT IT WAS NECESSARY FOR US AS THE HEADS OF THE DEPARTMENT TO THE HEADS OF THE DEPARTMENT TO REACH THAT DECISION. REACH THAT DECISION.>>WELL, HE SEEMED TO SUGGEST>>WELL, HE SEEMED TO SUGGEST YESTERDAY THAT THERE WAS ANOTHER YESTERDAY THAT THERE WAS ANOTHER VENUE FOR THIS AND THAT WAS VENUE FOR THIS AND THAT WAS CONGRESS. CONGRESS.>>WELL, I’M NOT SURE WHAT HE>>WELL, I’M NOT SURE WHAT HE WAS SUGGESTING, BUT, YOU KNOW, WAS SUGGESTING, BUT, YOU KNOW, THE DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE THE DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE DOESN’T USE OUR POWERS OF DOESN’T USE OUR POWERS OF INVESTIGATING CRIMES AS AN INVESTIGATING CRIMES AS AN ADJUNCT TO CONGRESS. ADJUNCT TO CONGRESS.>>THAT’S THE SOUND OF A VERY>>THAT’S THE SOUND OF A VERY SMART, VERY INFORMED LAWYER SMART, VERY INFORMED LAWYER CLAIMING TO BE CONFUSED, UNSURE. CLAIMING TO BE CONFUSED, UNSURE. HE JUST DOESN’T GET WHAT MUELLER HE JUST DOESN’T GET WHAT MUELLER SUGGESTED YESTERDAY. SUGGESTED YESTERDAY. THAT IS A TELL. THAT IS A TELL. BY PROCLAIMING HIS CONFUSION, BY PROCLAIMING HIS CONFUSION, BARR CAN CLAIM HE’S NOT EVEN BARR CAN CLAIM HE’S NOT EVEN REALLY TAKING A POSITION, THAT REALLY TAKING A POSITION, THAT MUELLER’S REMARKS WENT OVER HIS MUELLER’S REMARKS WENT OVER HIS HEAD. HEAD. BUT ALL MUELLER DID WAS QUOTE BUT ALL MUELLER DID WAS QUOTE THE DOJ’S OWN RULE THAT THE THE DOJ’S OWN RULE THAT THE PRESIDENT’S EMPLOYEES DON’T PRESIDENT’S EMPLOYEES DON’T ACCUSE HIM OF WRONGDOING. ACCUSE HIM OF WRONGDOING. THAT’S THE ROLE OF CONGRESS. THAT’S THE ROLE OF CONGRESS.>>THE OPINION SAYS THAT THE>>THE OPINION SAYS THAT THE CONSTITUTION REQUIRES A PROCESS CONSTITUTION REQUIRES A PROCESS OTHER THAN THE CRIMINAL JUSTICE OTHER THAN THE CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM TO FORMALLY ACCUSE A SYSTEM TO FORMALLY ACCUSE A SITTING PRESIDENT OF WRONGDOING. SITTING PRESIDENT OF WRONGDOING.>>AND THE NUMBER OF DEMOCRATS>>AND THE NUMBER OF DEMOCRATS TONIGHT NOW PUSHING TO MAKE THAT TONIGHT NOW PUSHING TO MAKE THAT FORMAL ACCUSAL, TO USE MUELLER’S FORMAL ACCUSAL, TO USE MUELLER’S WORDS, IS GROWING. WORDS, IS GROWING. THE CALLS FOR IMPEACHMENT HAS THE CALLS FOR IMPEACHMENT HAS HIT 50 NOW. HIT 50 NOW. THE CHAIRMAN OF THE POWERFUL THE CHAIRMAN OF THE POWERFUL HOUSE RULES COMMITTEE BREAKING HOUSE RULES COMMITTEE BREAKING WITH PELOSI AND ECHOING THAT THE WITH PELOSI AND ECHOING THAT THE TIME FOR TALKING IS OVER. TIME FOR TALKING IS OVER.>>I BELIEVE QUITE FRANKLY THAT>>I BELIEVE QUITE FRANKLY THAT THE NEXT STEP IS FOR THE HOUSE THE NEXT STEP IS FOR THE HOUSE JUDICIARY COMMITTEE TO OPEN AN JUDICIARY COMMITTEE TO OPEN AN INQUIRY TO FORMALLY BEGIN INQUIRY TO FORMALLY BEGIN CONSIDERING WHETHER IMPEACHMENT CONSIDERING WHETHER IMPEACHMENT IS WARRANTED. IS WARRANTED. I THINK WE’RE AT THAT POINT. I THINK WE’RE AT THAT POINT. QUITE FRANKLY, WE’RE BEYOND QUITE FRANKLY, WE’RE BEYOND TALKING ABOUT THIS IN TERMS OF TALKING ABOUT THIS IN TERMS OF POLITICAL IMPLICATIONS. POLITICAL IMPLICATIONS. I MEAN WE HAVE TO DO WHAT’S I MEAN WE HAVE TO DO WHAT’S RIGHT. RIGHT.>>PRESIDENT TRUMP TOOK THE>>PRESIDENT TRUMP TOOK THE DEBATE HEAD ON TELLING REPORTERS DEBATE HEAD ON TELLING REPORTERS MUELLER’S NEW REMARKS WERE THE MUELLER’S NEW REMARKS WERE THE SAME AS THE REPORT. SAME AS THE REPORT. THAT PART IS TRUE. THAT PART IS TRUE. AND STATING HIS REVULSION AT THE AND STATING HIS REVULSION AT THE VERY WORD “IMPEACHMENT.” VERY WORD “IMPEACHMENT.”>>DO YOU THINK THEY’RE GONNA>>DO YOU THINK THEY’RE GONNA IMPEACH YOU? IMPEACH YOU?>>I DON’T SEE HOW.>>I DON’T SEE HOW. THEY CAN BECAUSE THEY’RE THEY CAN BECAUSE THEY’RE POSSIBLY ALLOWED, ALTHOUGH I POSSIBLY ALLOWED, ALTHOUGH I CAN’T IMAGINE THE COURTS CAN’T IMAGINE THE COURTS ALLOWING IT. ALLOWING IT. I’VE NEVER GOT INTO IT. I’VE NEVER GOT INTO IT. I NEVER THOUGHT THAT WOULD EVEN I NEVER THOUGHT THAT WOULD EVEN BE POSSIBLE TO BE USE THAT WORD. BE POSSIBLE TO BE USE THAT WORD. TO ME IT’S A DIRTY WORD, THE TO ME IT’S A DIRTY WORD, THE WORD “IMPEACH.” WORD “IMPEACH.” IT’S A DIRTY, FILTHY, DISGUSTING IT’S A DIRTY, FILTHY, DISGUSTING WORD. WORD. I’M JOINED BY JUANITA TOLLIVER, I’M JOINED BY JUANITA TOLLIVER, DAVID FRUM AND CONGRESSMAN BRAD DAVID FRUM AND CONGRESSMAN BRAD SHERMAN, WHO’S CALLING FOR SHERMAN, WHO’S CALLING FOR IMPEACHMENT AND INTRODUCED AN — IMPEACHMENT AND INTRODUCED AN –>>I’M NOT SURE YOU DESCRIBED MY>>I’M NOT SURE YOU DESCRIBED MY POSITION ACCURATELY, BUT WE’LL POSITION ACCURATELY, BUT WE’LL GET TO IT. GET TO IT.>>WE’LL GET TO IT RIGHT NOW.>>WE’LL GET TO IT RIGHT NOW. GO FOR IT. GO FOR IT.>>LOOK, THE PRESIDENT>>LOOK, THE PRESIDENT OBSTRUCTED JUSTICE. OBSTRUCTED JUSTICE. THAT WAS APPARENT TO ME IN 2017 THAT WAS APPARENT TO ME IN 2017 WHEN I INTRODUCED ARTICLES OF WHEN I INTRODUCED ARTICLES OF IMPEACHMENT, BUT I KNEW THOSE IMPEACHMENT, BUT I KNEW THOSE ARTICLES COULDN’T LEAD ANYWHERE ARTICLES COULDN’T LEAD ANYWHERE WITHOUT BIPARTISAN SUPPORT WITHOUT BIPARTISAN SUPPORT BECAUSE, OF COURSE, REPUBLICANS BECAUSE, OF COURSE, REPUBLICANS WERE IN CONTROL. WERE IN CONTROL. PROSECUTORS DON’T INDICT UNLESS PROSECUTORS DON’T INDICT UNLESS THEY THINK THEY CAN GET A THEY THINK THEY CAN GET A CONVICTION. CONVICTION. WE NEED TO CHANGE PUBLIC OPINION WE NEED TO CHANGE PUBLIC OPINION SO THAT WE’LL GET A FAIR HEARING SO THAT WE’LL GET A FAIR HEARING IN THE UNITED STATES SENATE IN THE UNITED STATES SENATE BECAUSE IMPEACHMENT WITHOUT BECAUSE IMPEACHMENT WITHOUT REMOVAL IS — REMOVAL IS –>>WHAT WAS INACCURATE ABOUT>>WHAT WAS INACCURATE ABOUT MENTIONING THAT YOU WERE FOR MENTIONING THAT YOU WERE FOR IMPEACHMENT. IMPEACHMENT.>>CERTAINLY I THINK HE SHOULD>>CERTAINLY I THINK HE SHOULD BE — WELL, IMPEACHMENT AND BE — WELL, IMPEACHMENT AND REMOVAL IS A PACKAGE. REMOVAL IS A PACKAGE. AND TO IMPEACH WITHOUT REMOVAL AND TO IMPEACH WITHOUT REMOVAL IS, I THINK, A MISTAKE. IS, I THINK, A MISTAKE. IT HAS SOME ADVANTAGES BUT IT IT HAS SOME ADVANTAGES BUT IT HAS SOME DISADVANTAGES. HAS SOME DISADVANTAGES.>>BUT IT IS CORRECT TO SAY>>BUT IT IS CORRECT TO SAY YOU’VE BEEN PUSHING TOWARDS YOU’VE BEEN PUSHING TOWARDS IMPEACHMENT? IMPEACHMENT?>>I HAVE BEEN PUSHING TOWARDS>>I HAVE BEEN PUSHING TOWARDS IMPEACHMENT. IMPEACHMENT.>>OKAY.>>OKAY.>>BUT I WANT IMPEACHMENT ON A>>BUT I WANT IMPEACHMENT ON A BIPARTISAN BASIS, YES. BIPARTISAN BASIS, YES.>>I’VE GOT TO CORRECT YOUR>>I’VE GOT TO CORRECT YOUR CORRECTION THEN. CORRECTION THEN.>>OVERSIMPLIFICATION PERHAPS.>>OVERSIMPLIFICATION PERHAPS. I THINK I’VE EXPRESSED ENOUGH. I THINK I’VE EXPRESSED ENOUGH.>>I DON’T KNOW WHAT YOU’RE>>I DON’T KNOW WHAT YOU’RE DOING, SIR. DOING, SIR. YOU ADVOCATED FOR IMPEACHMENT. YOU ADVOCATED FOR IMPEACHMENT. YOU INTRODUCED A RESOLUTION FOR YOU INTRODUCED A RESOLUTION FOR IMPEACHMENT. IMPEACHMENT. I WANT TO GET THE OTHER I WANT TO GET THE OTHER PANELISTS IN. PANELISTS IN. YOU CAN USE YOUR TIME AS YOU SEE YOU CAN USE YOUR TIME AS YOU SEE FIT. FIT. DO YOU WANT TO TALK ABOUT THE DO YOU WANT TO TALK ABOUT THE CASE THAT YOU’RE MAKING FOR CASE THAT YOU’RE MAKING FOR IMPEACHMENT? IMPEACHMENT?>>ACTUALLY I’VE BEEN TRYING TO>>ACTUALLY I’VE BEEN TRYING TO GET ON YOUR SHOW TO TALK ABOUT GET ON YOUR SHOW TO TALK ABOUT THE SAUDI NUCLEAR PRMOGRAM AND I THE SAUDI NUCLEAR PRMOGRAM AND I IT WAS MY TIME WE’D BE TALKING IT WAS MY TIME WE’D BE TALKING ABOUT EFFORTS TO CONTROL DRUG ABOUT EFFORTS TO CONTROL DRUG PRICES. PRICES. THERE’S THIS IMAGE THAT CONGRESS THERE’S THIS IMAGE THAT CONGRESS IS FOCUSED ON IMPEACHMENT. IS FOCUSED ON IMPEACHMENT. THAT’S THE ONLY THING I CAN GET THAT’S THE ONLY THING I CAN GET ON TV TO TALK ABOUT BUT IT’S NOT ON TV TO TALK ABOUT BUT IT’S NOT REALLY WHAT I’M WORKING ON. REALLY WHAT I’M WORKING ON.>>INTERESTING.>>INTERESTING. WELL, LOOK, WE DO A LOT OF WELL, LOOK, WE DO A LOT OF SUBJECTS HERE. SUBJECTS HERE. WE CAN GET INTO A LOT OF STUFF. WE CAN GET INTO A LOT OF STUFF. BOB MUELLER BROKE HIS SILENCE BOB MUELLER BROKE HIS SILENCE YESTERDAY AND SAID THIS IS AN YESTERDAY AND SAID THIS IS AN ISSUE FOR THE CONGRESS IF ISSUE FOR THE CONGRESS IF THERE’S A WRONGDOING TO BE THERE’S A WRONGDOING TO BE ACCUSED SO IT IS A BIG NEWS ACCUSED SO IT IS A BIG NEWS STORY, I DON’T THINK THAT’S IN STORY, I DON’T THINK THAT’S IN DEBATE. DEBATE. BEFORE I MOVE ON TO THE BEFORE I MOVE ON TO THE PANELISTS, SIR, WHAT DO YOU PANELISTS, SIR, WHAT DO YOU THINK IS THE MOST IMPORTANT THINK IS THE MOST IMPORTANT THING FOR CONGRESS TO DO NOW THING FOR CONGRESS TO DO NOW GIVEN WHAT HE SAID AND RESIGNED. GIVEN WHAT HE SAID AND RESIGNED.>>INVESTIGATE.>>INVESTIGATE. DO WHAT SAM IRVIN DID WITH HIS DO WHAT SAM IRVIN DID WITH HIS INVESTIGATIVE COMMITTEE IN THE INVESTIGATIVE COMMITTEE IN THE SENATE IN 1973. SENATE IN 1973. SHOW THE AMERICAN PEOPLE WHAT SHOW THE AMERICAN PEOPLE WHAT THE FACTS ARE. THE FACTS ARE. HAVE MUELLER TESTIFY BUT ALSO HAVE MUELLER TESTIFY BUT ALSO REVEAL OTHER FACTS BEYOND WHAT’S REVEAL OTHER FACTS BEYOND WHAT’S JUST IN THE NARROW CONFINES OF JUST IN THE NARROW CONFINES OF THE MUELLER REPORT. THE MUELLER REPORT.>>YEAH.>>YEAH.>>AND HOPE THAT WE CAN GET A>>AND HOPE THAT WE CAN GET A CHANGE IN PUBLIC OPINION THAT CHANGE IN PUBLIC OPINION THAT WILL LEAD TO A CHANGE IN THE WILL LEAD TO A CHANGE IN THE ATTITUDE OF REPUBLICAN SENATORS. ATTITUDE OF REPUBLICAN SENATORS. IT’S A TOUGH THING TO DO, BUT IF IT’S A TOUGH THING TO DO, BUT IF WE JUST EXPOSE TRUMP FOR WHAT WE JUST EXPOSE TRUMP FOR WHAT HE’S DONE, IF WE’RE UNABLE TO HE’S DONE, IF WE’RE UNABLE TO REMOVE HIM NOW, WE’VE GOT NEXT REMOVE HIM NOW, WE’VE GOT NEXT YEAR. YEAR.>>JUANITA, HAVING LISTENED TO>>JUANITA, HAVING LISTENED TO THE CONGRESSMAN THERE, HE’S THE CONGRESSMAN THERE, HE’S TALKING ABOUT OF COURSE THE TALKING ABOUT OF COURSE THE DIVIDE. DIVIDE. WHEN YOU TALK ABOUT ANYTHING WHEN YOU TALK ABOUT ANYTHING THAT REQUIRES A SUPER MAJORITY. THAT REQUIRES A SUPER MAJORITY. BUT LISTEN TO WHAT THE PRESIDENT BUT LISTEN TO WHAT THE PRESIDENT SAID THIS MORNING. SAID THIS MORNING. IT IS SOMETIMES COMMON TO POINT IT IS SOMETIMES COMMON TO POINT OUT EVERYTHING THAT HE SAYS IS OUT EVERYTHING THAT HE SAYS IS WRONG AND HE LIES MORE THAN ANY WRONG AND HE LIES MORE THAN ANY PRESIDENT WE’VE HAD, BUT HE DID PRESIDENT WE’VE HAD, BUT HE DID SAY SOMETHING THAT IS BOTH TRUE SAY SOMETHING THAT IS BOTH TRUE AND I THINK WILL RESONATE WITH AND I THINK WILL RESONATE WITH HIS SUPPORTERS, THAT BASICALLY HIS SUPPORTERS, THAT BASICALLY WHILE YESTERDAY WAS DRAMATIC AND WHILE YESTERDAY WAS DRAMATIC AND IMPORTANT AND THE FIRST TIME YOU IMPORTANT AND THE FIRST TIME YOU HEAR FROM BOB MUELLER, THE HEAR FROM BOB MUELLER, THE PRESIDENT UNDERSCORED THE IDEA PRESIDENT UNDERSCORED THE IDEA THERE WAS NOTHING NEW THAT THERE WAS NOTHING NEW THAT WASN’T IN THE REPORT. WASN’T IN THE REPORT.>>IT WAS TO ME THE SAME AS THE>>IT WAS TO ME THE SAME AS THE REPORT. REPORT. AND THERE’S NO OBSTRUCTION. AND THERE’S NO OBSTRUCTION. YOU SEE WHAT WE’RE SAYING. YOU SEE WHAT WE’RE SAYING. THERE’S NO OBSTRUCTION, THERE’S THERE’S NO OBSTRUCTION, THERE’S NO COLLUSION, THERE’S NO NO COLLUSION, THERE’S NO NOTHING. NOTHING. IT’S NOTHING BUT A WITCH HUNT. IT’S NOTHING BUT A WITCH HUNT. I THINK HE IS A TOTAL CONFLICTED I THINK HE IS A TOTAL CONFLICTED PERSON. PERSON. I THINK MUELLER IS A TRUE NEVER I THINK MUELLER IS A TRUE NEVER TRUMPER. TRUMPER. HE’S SOMEBODY THAT DISLIKES HE’S SOMEBODY THAT DISLIKES DONALD TRUMP. DONALD TRUMP.>>JUANITA, YOUR VIEW OF WHAT>>JUANITA, YOUR VIEW OF WHAT THE PRESIDENT IS ARGUING AND HOW THE PRESIDENT IS ARGUING AND HOW THAT CONNECTS WITH ANY LARGER THAT CONNECTS WITH ANY LARGER ATTEMPT TO SHAPE PUBLIC OPINION? ATTEMPT TO SHAPE PUBLIC OPINION?>>YEAH, FIRST AND FOREMOST IN>>YEAH, FIRST AND FOREMOST IN HIS MIND THIS IS CASE CLOSED, HIS MIND THIS IS CASE CLOSED, BUT THE REALITY IS MUELLER JUST BUT THE REALITY IS MUELLER JUST REITERATED WHAT HE WROTE IN THE REITERATED WHAT HE WROTE IN THE REPORT AND REFERRED THE MATTER REPORT AND REFERRED THE MATTER TO CONGRESS. TO CONGRESS. HE SAID THERE WAS INSUFFICIENT HE SAID THERE WAS INSUFFICIENT EVIDENCE TO MAKE A BROAD CLAIM EVIDENCE TO MAKE A BROAD CLAIM OF CONSPIRACY HERE, BUT THAT OF CONSPIRACY HERE, BUT THAT THERE IS SOMETHING THAT NEEDS TO THERE IS SOMETHING THAT NEEDS TO BE LOOKED INTO. BE LOOKED INTO. I THINK THE OTHER THING THAT I THINK THE OTHER THING THAT MUELLER RAISED YESTERDAY THAT MUELLER RAISED YESTERDAY THAT REALLY PIQUED MY INTEREST WAS REALLY PIQUED MY INTEREST WAS CONFIRMING THAT RUSSIANS CONFIRMING THAT RUSSIANS INTERFERED IN THE ELECTION, INTERFERED IN THE ELECTION, SOMETHING THAT ESSENTIAL LOW SOMETHING THAT ESSENTIAL LOW TRUMP ADMITTED TO AND AGREED TO TRUMP ADMITTED TO AND AGREED TO TODAY, THOUGH HE BACK TRACKED TODAY, THOUGH HE BACK TRACKED QUICKLY AND SAID RUSSIA QUICKLY AND SAID RUSSIA INTERFERED AND HELPED HIM WIN. INTERFERED AND HELPED HIM WIN. SO I THINK WHAT HE’S TRYING TO SO I THINK WHAT HE’S TRYING TO DO IS, OF COURSE, GET HIS BASE DO IS, OF COURSE, GET HIS BASE TO BELIEVE THAT THE CASE IS TO BELIEVE THAT THE CASE IS CLOSED HERE, WHICH IS ULTIMATELY CLOSED HERE, WHICH IS ULTIMATELY A LIE, AND HIS EFFORT TO REALLY A LIE, AND HIS EFFORT TO REALLY DISTRACT ATTENTION AWAY FROM A DISTRACT ATTENTION AWAY FROM A BIGGER MATTER THAT NEEDS TO BE BIGGER MATTER THAT NEEDS TO BE DUG INTO IN CONGRESS. DUG INTO IN CONGRESS.>>DAVID, YOU’VE BEEN UNSPARING>>DAVID, YOU’VE BEEN UNSPARING IN YOUR CRITICISM OF WHAT YOU IN YOUR CRITICISM OF WHAT YOU SEE AS MANY FAILURES OF DONALD SEE AS MANY FAILURES OF DONALD TRUMP, POLICY, ETHICAL AND TRUMP, POLICY, ETHICAL AND OTHERWISE. OTHERWISE. BUT YOU HAVE A DIFFERENT VIEW BUT YOU HAVE A DIFFERENT VIEW ABOUT HOW TO DEAL WITH ALL OF ABOUT HOW TO DEAL WITH ALL OF THIS. THIS. WHAT IS THAT? WHAT IS THAT?>>I AGREE WITH CONGRESSMAN>>I AGREE WITH CONGRESSMAN SHERMAN. SHERMAN. WHAT CONGRESS NEEDS TO DO IS GET WHAT CONGRESS NEEDS TO DO IS GET TO THE BOTTOM OF EITHER FACTS TO THE BOTTOM OF EITHER FACTS THAT EITHER ROBERT MUELLER THAT EITHER ROBERT MUELLER DIDN’T ANSWER OR DIDN’T DIDN’T ANSWER OR DIDN’T INVESTIGATE. INVESTIGATE. FOR EXAMPLE, ROBERT MUELLER DID FOR EXAMPLE, ROBERT MUELLER DID NOT LOOK AT THE WHOLE QUESTION NOT LOOK AT THE WHOLE QUESTION OF RUSSIA TAKE THESE OF RUSSIA TAKE THESE ENORMOUS RISKS TO HELP DONALD ENORMOUS RISKS TO HELP DONALD TRUMP. TRUMP. WHY DID THEY HAVE SO MUCH WHY DID THEY HAVE SO MUCH CONFIDENCE THAT HE WAS A BETTER CONFIDENCE THAT HE WAS A BETTER CHOICE THAN HILLARY CLINTON. CHOICE THAN HILLARY CLINTON. BOB MUELLER DIDN’T REALLY LOOK BOB MUELLER DIDN’T REALLY LOOK AT THAT QUESTION. AT THAT QUESTION. BUT THE ANSWERS MAY BE, FOR BUT THE ANSWERS MAY BE, FOR EXAMPLE, IN DONALD TRUMP’S EXAMPLE, IN DONALD TRUMP’S ACCOUNTING DOCUMENTS OR IN HIS ACCOUNTING DOCUMENTS OR IN HIS INCOME TAX RETURNS. INCOME TAX RETURNS. BUT TO PROCEED NOW WITH AN BUT TO PROCEED NOW WITH AN IMPEACHMENT IS TO GO DOWN A PATH IMPEACHMENT IS TO GO DOWN A PATH WHICH PRESIDENT TRUMP IS SURELY WHICH PRESIDENT TRUMP IS SURELY GOING TO WIN. GOING TO WIN. THAT HE HAS THE VOTES IN THE THAT HE HAS THE VOTES IN THE SENATE. SENATE. AND IF — IF THE SENATE REBUFFS AND IF — IF THE SENATE REBUFFS THE HOUSE, THEN DONALD TRUMP IS THE HOUSE, THEN DONALD TRUMP IS GOING TO CLAIM BEFORE THE 2020 GOING TO CLAIM BEFORE THE 2020 ELECTION, I GOT MY HEARING, MY ELECTION, I GOT MY HEARING, MY CRITICS DID THEIR WORST AND I CRITICS DID THEIR WORST AND I WAS ACQUITTED. WAS ACQUITTED. IT IS — THAT’S THE WRONG WAY TO IT IS — THAT’S THE WRONG WAY TO GO. GO. WHAT YOU MEANT TO DO IS GO DOWN WHAT YOU MEANT TO DO IS GO DOWN A PATH THAT WILL LEAD TO SUCCESS A PATH THAT WILL LEAD TO SUCCESS AND GET INFORMATION AND AS THE AND GET INFORMATION AND AS THE CONGRESSMAN SAID SHAPE THE MIND CONGRESSMAN SAID SHAPE THE MIND OF THE COUNTRY TO UNDERSTAND OF THE COUNTRY TO UNDERSTAND WHAT THEY’RE DEALING WITH. WHAT THEY’RE DEALING WITH. VERY FEW PEOPLE READ THE MUELLER VERY FEW PEOPLE READ THE MUELLER REPORT. REPORT. THAT’S ONE OF THE THINGS BOB THAT’S ONE OF THE THINGS BOB MUELLER IS COMPLAINING ABOUT. MUELLER IS COMPLAINING ABOUT. BUT TO HELP THE MIND OF THE BUT TO HELP THE MIND OF THE COUNTRY UNDERSTAND WHAT KID OF COUNTRY UNDERSTAND WHAT KID OF PERSON THIS PRESIDENT IS, WHAT PERSON THIS PRESIDENT IS, WHAT HIS CONNECTIONS ARE, HOW HE HIS CONNECTIONS ARE, HOW HE BECAME THE PRESIDENT IN THE BECAME THE PRESIDENT IN THE FIRST PLACE. FIRST PLACE. THAT CALLS FOR THOSE KIND OF THAT CALLS FOR THOSE KIND OF HEARINGS, NOT AN ARGUMENT ABOUT HEARINGS, NOT AN ARGUMENT ABOUT THE TECHNICALITIES OF THE TECHNICALITIES OF OBSTRUCTION AND WHAT THE OBSTRUCTION AND WHAT THE APPROPRIATE PENALTY IS FOR FACTS APPROPRIATE PENALTY IS FOR FACTS THE PUBLIC STILL DOESN’T KNOW THE PUBLIC STILL DOESN’T KNOW FULLY. FULLY.>>DAVID, DOES IT MATTER TO YOU>>DAVID, DOES IT MATTER TO YOU THAT ATTORNEY GENERAL BARR AS WE THAT ATTORNEY GENERAL BARR AS WE JUST SHOWED, AND I’LL PLAY A JUST SHOWED, AND I’LL PLAY A LITTLE MORE IN THIS BRAND NEW LITTLE MORE IN THIS BRAND NEW INTERVIEW, THE MOST CAREFUL WAY INTERVIEW, THE MOST CAREFUL WAY I CAN SAY IT IS SEEMS TO BE I CAN SAY IT IS SEEMS TO BE WILLFULLY MUDDYING THE PUBLIC WILLFULLY MUDDYING THE PUBLIC UNDERSTANDING AND HE IS THE UNDERSTANDING AND HE IS THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE UNITED ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE UNITED STATES, SO IT SHOULD MATTER EVEN STATES, SO IT SHOULD MATTER EVEN IF PEOPLE HAVE LOWER IF PEOPLE HAVE LOWER EXPECTATIONS GIVEN THE CONDUCT EXPECTATIONS GIVEN THE CONDUCT THUS FAR. THUS FAR. TAKE A LOOK AT HIM AND COMPARE TAKE A LOOK AT HIM AND COMPARE IT TO MUELLER RIGHT HERE. IT TO MUELLER RIGHT HERE.>>WE SPECIFICALLY ASKED HIM>>WE SPECIFICALLY ASKED HIM ABOUT THE OLC OPINION AND ABOUT THE OLC OPINION AND WHETHER OR NOT HE WAS TAKING THE WHETHER OR NOT HE WAS TAKING THE POSITION THAT HE WOULD HAVE POSITION THAT HE WOULD HAVE FOUND A CRIME BUT FOR THE FOUND A CRIME BUT FOR THE EXISTENCE OF THE OLC OPINION AND EXISTENCE OF THE OLC OPINION AND HE MADE IT VERY CLEAR SEVERAL HE MADE IT VERY CLEAR SEVERAL TIMES THAT THAT WAS NOT HIS TIMES THAT THAT WAS NOT HIS POSITION. POSITION.>>SO THAT WAS JUSTICE>>SO THAT WAS JUSTICE DEPARTMENT POLICY. DEPARTMENT POLICY. THOSE WERE THE PRINCIPLES UNDER THOSE WERE THE PRINCIPLES UNDER WHICH WE OPERATED. WHICH WE OPERATED. AND FROM THEM WE CONCLUDED THAT AND FROM THEM WE CONCLUDED THAT WE WOULD, WOULD NOT REACH A WE WOULD, WOULD NOT REACH A DETERMINATION ONE WAY OR THE DETERMINATION ONE WAY OR THE OTHER ABOUT WHETHER THE OTHER ABOUT WHETHER THE PRESIDENT COMMITTED A CRIME. PRESIDENT COMMITTED A CRIME.>>AS I REPORTED LAST NIGHT,>>AS I REPORTED LAST NIGHT, DAVID, A MUELLER SPOKESPERSON DAVID, A MUELLER SPOKESPERSON PERSONALLY ASSURED ME THAT THOSE PERSONALLY ASSURED ME THAT THOSE TWO THINGS ARE NOT IN ANY TWO THINGS ARE NOT IN ANY CONFLICT AND MUELLER IS THIS CONFLICT AND MUELLER IS THIS TEAM PLAYER. TEAM PLAYER. A LOT OF OTHER PEOPLE SEE A LOT OF OTHER PEOPLE SEE CONFLICT. CONFLICT. DO YOU THINK THAT A.G. BARR HERE DO YOU THINK THAT A.G. BARR HERE HAS BEEN ON THE LEVEL. HAS BEEN ON THE LEVEL.>>OF COURSE NOT.>>OF COURSE NOT. IF HE WERE AN HONORABLE AND IF HE WERE AN HONORABLE AND FORTHRIGHT PERSON, HE WOULDN’T FORTHRIGHT PERSON, HE WOULDN’T HAVE GOTTEN THE JOB IN THE FIRST HAVE GOTTEN THE JOB IN THE FIRST PLACE. PLACE. THE MOST IMPORTANT JOB THE MOST IMPORTANT JOB QUALIFICATION FOR THIS JOB IN QUALIFICATION FOR THIS JOB IN PRESIDENT TRUMP’S EYES IS TO BE PRESIDENT TRUMP’S EYES IS TO BE A DISHONORABLE PERSON. A DISHONORABLE PERSON. WHEN HE DISCOVERED THAT JEFF WHEN HE DISCOVERED THAT JEFF SESSIONS WAS MORE HONORABLE SESSIONS WAS MORE HONORABLE DONALD TRUMP COULD STOMACH, HE DONALD TRUMP COULD STOMACH, HE CAMPAIGNED AGAINST HIM. CAMPAIGNED AGAINST HIM. BUT THESE INTELLECTUAL BUT THESE INTELLECTUAL ASSESSMENTS, THESE MORAL ASSESSMENTS, THESE MORAL ASSESSMENTS SHOULD NOT DRIVE ASSESSMENTS SHOULD NOT DRIVE YOUR POLITICAL JUDGMENT OF WHAT YOUR POLITICAL JUDGMENT OF WHAT ARE GOING TO BE THE PROBABLE ARE GOING TO BE THE PROBABLE POLITICAL CONSEQUENCES OF POLITICAL CONSEQUENCES OF WALKING DOWN A CERTAIN PATH. WALKING DOWN A CERTAIN PATH. POLITICIANS HAVE TO BE JUDGED BY POLITICIANS HAVE TO BE JUDGED BY RESULTS IN THE END, AND THE RESULTS IN THE END, AND THE RESULTS OF COMMENCING RESULTS OF COMMENCING IMPEACHMENT NOW ARE GOING TO BE IMPEACHMENT NOW ARE GOING TO BE TO DONALD TRUMP’S BENEFIT, NOT TO DONALD TRUMP’S BENEFIT, NOT TO THE COUNTRY’S. TO THE COUNTRY’S.>>JUANITA?>>JUANITA?>>YEAH, I THINK ONE ADDITIONAL>>YEAH, I THINK ONE ADDITIONAL THING ABOUT BARR, NOT ONLY IS HE THING ABOUT BARR, NOT ONLY IS HE JUST THIS PERSON WHO SEEMS TO JUST THIS PERSON WHO SEEMS TO LACK A DEGREE OF INTEGRITY BUT LACK A DEGREE OF INTEGRITY BUT HE IS EXTREMELY LOYAL TO TRUMP HE IS EXTREMELY LOYAL TO TRUMP AND PLAYED TO TRUMP REPEATEDLY, AND PLAYED TO TRUMP REPEATEDLY, WHETHER IT’S IN CONGRESSIONAL WHETHER IT’S IN CONGRESSIONAL HEARINGS, WHETHER IT’S IN THE HEARINGS, WHETHER IT’S IN THE SUMMARY LETTER WHERE HE SUMMARY LETTER WHERE HE ANNOUNCED THIS WAS A TOTAL ANNOUNCED THIS WAS A TOTAL EXONERATION, WHICH IS A JARRING EXONERATION, WHICH IS A JARRING JUXTAPOSITION TO WHAT SPECIAL JUXTAPOSITION TO WHAT SPECIAL COUNSEL MUELLER SAID REPEATEDLY. COUNSEL MUELLER SAID REPEATEDLY. EVEN IN THE LETTER SPECIAL EVEN IN THE LETTER SPECIAL COUNSEL MUELLER CHALLENGED BARR COUNSEL MUELLER CHALLENGED BARR BECAUSE HE SAID HIS SUMMARY DID BECAUSE HE SAID HIS SUMMARY DID NOT CAPTURE THE CONTEXT OR THE NOT CAPTURE THE CONTEXT OR THE SUBSTANCE OF THE REPORT AND HE SUBSTANCE OF THE REPORT AND HE WAS WORKING TO MISLEAD THE WAS WORKING TO MISLEAD THE AMERICAN PEOPLE, WHICH TRUMP IS AMERICAN PEOPLE, WHICH TRUMP IS ACTIVELY DOING. ACTIVELY DOING.>>JUANITA, DID THAT SURPRISE>>JUANITA, DID THAT SURPRISE YOU THAT WE KNOW MUELLER YOU THAT WE KNOW MUELLER DISAGREED WITH BARR ABOUT THAT DISAGREED WITH BARR ABOUT THAT AND YESTERDAY HE CLEARLY TRIED AND YESTERDAY HE CLEARLY TRIED TO STEER CLEAR OF THAT. TO STEER CLEAR OF THAT.>>HE TRIED TO STEER CLEAR OF IT>>HE TRIED TO STEER CLEAR OF IT BECAUSE HE’S A MAN OF INTEGRITY BECAUSE HE’S A MAN OF INTEGRITY AND HYPERFOCUSED ON HIS MISSION. AND HYPERFOCUSED ON HIS MISSION. THAT’S ONE THING THAT YOU CAN THAT’S ONE THING THAT YOU CAN TAKE AWAY FROM HIS COMMENTS TAKE AWAY FROM HIS COMMENTS YESTERDAY RELATED TO THE FACT YESTERDAY RELATED TO THE FACT THAT YOU CAN NOT INDICT A THAT YOU CAN NOT INDICT A PRESIDENT. PRESIDENT. OF COURSE I WAS NOT GOING DOWN OF COURSE I WAS NOT GOING DOWN THAT ROUTE. THAT ROUTE. I THINK THAT BARR NOR TRUMP I THINK THAT BARR NOR TRUMP DON’T KNOW WHAT TO DO WITH THAT. DON’T KNOW WHAT TO DO WITH THAT. THEY DON’T KNOW WHAT TO DO WITH THEY DON’T KNOW WHAT TO DO WITH A PERSON WHO OPERATES WITH THAT A PERSON WHO OPERATES WITH THAT DEGREE OF INTEGRITY. DEGREE OF INTEGRITY. SO YOU HAD TRUMP GOING ON SO YOU HAD TRUMP GOING ON MULTIPLE RANTS TODAY, TWEETING MULTIPLE RANTS TODAY, TWEETING UP A STORM, DISTRACTING FROM HIS UP A STORM, DISTRACTING FROM HIS FAILURES AS A LEADER BUT WORKING

Author:

100 thoughts on “Watch Donald Trump AG Bill Barr Get Busted For Upstaging Mueller | The Beat With Ari Melber | MSNBC”

  • William Bachmann says:

    "I can not conclude the president did not commit a crime…"

    Meaning he can't conclude the president DID commit a crime, either.

    You fools are so gullible. This is Mueller's way of avoiding having to say "I got nuthin…".

  • AG Barr was the boss of Mueller.
    The Democrats' Justice Committee were too vociferous about declaring AG Barr in contempt. The Democrats could only pass certificate on contempt charge but did not push through with actual contempt vote. All noise, no result.

  • All Barr and no bite. – IMPEACH THE BEACH./// I went for a job interview. I didn't let the recruiter get in a word edgewise. I then got hired as a news correspondent.

    .

  • "We always have next year" to begin impeachment? WTF? And, what planet is this guy from? By next year, Trump will have completely destroyed our country's credibility with our allies and ultimately, undermined our economy. I believe it was Nostradamus who foresaw the antichrist rising up in these times. I always assumed it was Hitler but now I'm not so sure.

  • πŸ–•πŸ–•πŸ–•πŸ–•πŸ–•πŸ–•πŸ–•πŸ–•πŸ–•πŸ–•πŸ–•πŸ–•πŸ–•πŸ–•πŸ–•πŸ–•πŸ–•πŸ–•πŸ–•πŸ–•πŸ–•πŸ–•πŸ–•πŸ–•πŸ–•πŸ–•πŸ–•πŸ–•πŸ–•πŸ–•πŸ–•πŸ–•πŸ–•πŸ–•πŸ–•πŸ–•πŸ–•πŸ–•πŸ–• all of you lefts,libs…. i don't like Trump by the way

  • Darlene McHugh says:

    Why is barr still in charge??? I don’t believe one word he says!!! He is Donald Trump’s lawyer! He does not work for the people and never has!

  • jan vanroekel says:

    William Barr said in CBS interview this is the last chapter of his political life….. He appears to me the guy that says everything for a couple of million dollars; some extra retirement money!?!!!

  • If Barr gets"answers" he doesn't like from his investigation…are we going to hear about those??? I think we need a full report.

  • Elle Krimowa says:

    We have enough facts to the moon and back..it's time for action IMPEACHMENT ASAP, better yet 25th AMENTMENT..SHAME on the Silent Enablers GOP, barr, rosenstein

  • Richie Tattersall says:

    The United States Supreme Court has previously rulled that they have nothing to do with Congress removing a President via the Impeachment process.

  • Guilty of upstageing a guy who said "guilty till proven innocent" basically??? Whats the punishment for this??? Oh you reporting nonsense is the oh so harsh punishment. Alrighty then. FAKE NEWS!!! Good job though youre catching up to the πŸ‹NN. Thats CNN for you lefties.

  • Russian bot 1013 says:

    See here's the funny thing. You impeach we win. You dont impeach the commies get mad and we still win. It's that checkers vs chess thing. President Trump has once again played the donkey party like the over emotional fools they are.

  • Barr's face is melting like the Nazi that touched the chalice. By the way the word is WRITE not RIGHT. Stupid. Go BAKE your own KAKE.

  • Smith Brook Hollow says:

    They should not have put the Congressman on with these other two, he should have been interviewed alone

  • Chris Lockwood says:

    Funny how none of you β€œeducated β€œ MSNBC viewers noticed a Democrat congressman calling out the host and the liberal media’s constant pushing of impeachment. It’s political suicide, and the experienced dems know it.

  • Mueller is going to be forced to eat the excrement sandwich he made. Ask all the innocent people's lives he ruined in the past, oh yeah it's true, look it up!

  • B. Terence Harwick says:

    Brad Sherman is a man of integrity. "Correct his correction?" Sorry Ari. You're too much of a digital thinker. That's OK for a lawyer and you are good at that useful skill. Β 
    It's also good to consider a bit more nuance. We should hear from Mr. Sherman on issues he identifies of great concern to Americans — notably, out of control drug prices in the USA.

  • Ryan Anderson says:

    Barr is a stooge, sucking trump and lying just like his boss, trying to mislead the American people. Republicunts are as unAmerican as ever. They only care about their power and their money.

  • The LSM also has their own patterns when it comes to this president; all of it anti-Trump. Thanks for the laughs. Sandwich metaphors have never been so irrelevant.

  • Accident hit msnbc and now i feel sick after 30 second… Non stop story telling and misinterpreting the news… We are only days away from all the Dems being charged, what will your news be on that day

  • At the 4:40 minute mark, Congressman Brad Sherman says they need to change public opinion to remove Trump. The only way to impeach Trump is to have a reason to impeach him. The Mueller investigation didn't find anything. What is Congress going to find? What a bunch of losers.

  • Impeachment Donald Trump NOW he the guy RACISM. We don't like HIM. Please step down or regis Donald Trump. ! We HATE YOU PRESIDENT USA

  • Look u snow flakes in the USA. LAW STATES GUILTY OR NOT GUILTY. MULLER AND THE REST U DEMONS WANNA TWIST ALL UP. IF TRUMP WAS GUILTY MULLER WOULD HAVE BEEN SCREAMING FROM ROOF TOPS. IT DOESN'T MATTER WEATHER PRESIDENT Can't be PROSECUTED. MULLER WOULD HAVE BEEN SCREAMING FROM guilty guilty.

  • Millionaire In the making says:

    Notice how barr always says "The Deputy Attorney General and I " He does that on purpose to minimize his role in this cover up. He is the top guy. He should Say "I along with the Deputy Attorney General" made the decision to determine there wasnt enough evidence. Liar

  • Wow what an asshat clown that representative (?) is. I don’t even know his name. First and last time he’ll be on TV, I’m sure. If he thinks it’s important to turn public opinion to the seriousness of the president’s crimes and the need for impeachment, he isn’t helping by just talking about himself.

  • Reginald Allen says:

    Notice how the Democrats RUN from the Collusion Conspiracy point! Which helps the Republicans that also were part of the CONSPIRACY…

  • First, Mueller is saying he can't indict a sitting president, then why 2+years on investigation??? Secondly, if there is no underlying crime what is being obstructed??? Mueller is CYA right now. I want to see the FISA warrant applications, signed by people who swore under oath it had been verified, all 4 of them. Barr is already got Oher and Page flipping, how long b4 Comey does the CYA??

  • Kenneth Taylor says:

    Barr uses the language of a barroom lawyer to misdirect and undermine. "Answers to my questions didn't hang together" ??

  • What Barr says matters. What MSNBC says does not And Muller just proved his investment was political all along.

  • Robert Berry says:

    We now can openly admit what we already knew, Barr is Trumps personal attorney not the A.G for the people.

  • I don’t know if his hands are small but his flicking fingers are very short. Any correlation with anything else?

  • MSNBC is misleading its ever shrinking audience. Its sad because just imagine how great we could be doing United rather than divided by false reporting

  • Silly democrats, you will learn the hard way. Do you not have any analytical abilities? Can't you see, hear, read? Such Minions. Pathetic morons on the left

  • Lolita Nelson says:

    WHEN ARE FEDERAL JUDGES ARE GOING TO STOP UP HOLDING THE DEMOCRATS AND LEAVE WE THE ANERICAN PEOPLE LIFES IN DANGER.

  • Blah blah blah as long as it is American tax dollars flipping the bill for all these useless investigations. Trump is a coward scared to go to war. The next best thing in his feeble mind physically inadequate body would be to become a traitor which he is. 1000 former prosecutors signed a note saying they would prosecute. Trump is a sexual criminal sexual failure which is another reason a person would become a traitor. Hating themselves hating their country.

  • b david greenwell says:

    Mueller couldn't come to a conclusion about obstruction, but he could about collusion? If there had been proof of collusion or conspiracy, he couldn't have sent up charges, so why have him investigate at all? It was all an attempt to impeach the president from the beginning! What a sham!

  • Rosenstein tells Mueller he's not allowed to look at a bunch of things,

    then Rosenstein tells Mueller he can't report on some things that are salacious.

    Then barr tells him to hurry up.

    and barr tells him he's not allowed to indict, then batr comes on TV and says, 'I don't know why he didn't indict, so we didn't either"

  • Ha Ha Ha ……….. Barr and Durham are on the way boys and girls. Did you happen to see the letter to Nadler from Stephen Boyd today ………. LOL ! You left wing swamp rats are going down soon. Enjoy the ride. Trump 2020 !

  • Sandra Gruhle says:

    We cannot assume that dumpy is bright enough to strategize or out guess anyone. His stupidity is much too obvious for us to assume he is able to think in anything but a selfish or egotistical manner.

  • It appears Barr wasnt impressed with the SC's work after 22 months. Mueller submitted the report, so he's done. He's not going to DEMAND make a decision, that's coercion. What if Muellar came to conclusion there was not sufficient evidence to indict. Then it would leak that Barr pressured him to make THAT decision. Barr would never put himself in that position, and it would have further delayed the report. He was smart, He collaborated with the A.A.G., and the OLC and made the call on obstruction per DOJ standards.

  • Its amazing how (M)iserable(S)adistic(N)arcissistic(B)unch of(C)ommunist like to SPIN every legal aspect of what's obvious and true into something else because the fear of BARR proving how criminal these DEMO-RATS truly are! It's going to be proven REGARDLESS!

    P.S Bob Mueller is a WEASEL, in my opinion for coming out so COWARDLY with his results!

  • Designteam Norway says:

    Funny thing is democrats wants to impeach trump for russia collution that was initiated and paid for by dems clinton and followed up by fbi. So they wants to impeach a president for the crimes they did? Is the world insane or what?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *