Trump questions Jewish support of Dems as ‘lack of knowledge’

Trump questions Jewish support of Dems as ‘lack of knowledge’


HOUR ON “AMERICA’S NEWSROOM.”>>Sandra: MEANWHILE PRESIDENT TRUMP NOW CALLING OUT DEMOCRATIC CONGRESSWOMAN RASHIDA TO LEAD. AT>>FIVE YEARS AGO THE CONCEPT OF EVEN COOK TALKING ABOUT THIS, OF CUTTING OFF AID TO ISRAEL BECAUSE OF TWO PEOPLE THAT HATE ISRAEL AND HATE JEWISH PEOPLE, I CAN’T BELIEVE WE ARE HAVING THIS CONVERSATION. WHERE HAS THIS DEMOCRATIC PARTY GONE? I THINK ANY JEWISH PEOPLE TO VOTE FOR A DEMOCRAT, I THINK IT SHOWS EITHER A TOTAL LACK OF KNOWLEDGE OR GREAT DISLOYALTY.>>Sandra: A “WASHINGTON POST” COLUMNIST AND WASHINGTON NEWS CONTRIBUTOR, THE PRESIDENT TRYING TO CONVINCE DEMOCRATIC VOTERS THAT THESE DEMOCRATIC CONGRESSWOMAN GO AGAINST THEIR INTEREST. WILL IT COST HIM VOTES IN THE DEMOCRATIC ELECTION?>>I WOULDN’T HAVE CHOSEN THESE WORDS BUT HIS LARGER POINT IS RIGHT. THEY ARE ANTI-SEMITES. THEY’VE COMPARED ISRAEL TO NAZI GERMANY AND THEY ADVOCATE THE BDS MOVEMENT, THE BOY BOYCOTT MOVEMENT. SHE SAID SHE SUPPORTS A ONE STATE SOLUTION WHICH MEANS SHE DOESN’T SUPPORT THE EXISTENCE OF THE STATE OF ISRAEL SO THESE PEOPLE ARE REALLY BAD PEOPLE. THEY NOT ONLY TOLERATE THEM BUT ARE ACTUALLY DEFENDING THAT IS APPALLING. AND IT LOOKED BACK — LOOK BACK JUST RECENTLY TO WIN CONGRESSMAN STEVE KING, A REPUBLICAN, MADE COMMENTS DEFENDING THE WHITE SUPREMACY. THE REPUBLICANS ON CAPITOL HILL STRIPPED HIM OF HIS COMMITTEE ASSIGNMENTS AND PASSED A RESOLUTION CONDEMNING HIM. THE DEMOCRATS CAN’T BRING THEMSELVES TO DO THE SAME THING, WHY NOT? WHY IS OMAR SITTING ON THE HOUSE FOREIGN AFFAIRS COMMITTEE WHICH IS THE COMMITTEE THAT DECIDES U.S. POLICY TOWARDS ISRAEL? THE FACT THAT THEY TOLERATE THESE ANTI-SEMITES IN THEIR MIDST CALLS IN TO THEIR QUESTION THEIR FITNESS.>>Sandra: HILLARY CLINTON GOT 71% OF THE JEWISH VOTE TO DONALD TRUMP’S 24% AND IT WAS EVEN MORE PREVALENT IN THE 2018 ELECTION WHEN JEWISH VOTERS BACKED REPUBLICANS. WE WILL SEE WHERE THAT GOES. NOW TO THE PRESIDENT. A DAY AFTER THE WHITE HOUSE SAID IT WAS NOT UNDER CONSIDERATION, NOW SAYING HE IS CONSIDERING A PAYROLL TAX CUT. HERE’S THE PRESIDENT.>>President Trump: PAYROLL TAXES. I’VE BEEN THINKING ABOUT WHETHER OR NOT I DO IT. AT THE CRITICISM IS ALREADY OUT THERE>>OF THE ECONOMY IS DOING VERY WELL AND IT MAY BE SLOWING. MOST ECONOMIES DON’T THINK IT’S GOING TOWARDS RECESSION BUT IT IS SLOWING. THE PAYROLL TAX CUT IS A PERFECTLY A LEGITIMATE TOOL. IN 2011 BARACK OBAMA WORKED WITH REPUBLICAN CONGRESS TO PASS A PAYROLL TAX HOLIDAY TO PUT ABOUT A THOUSAND DOLLARS IN THE POCKETS OF EVERY AMERICAN FAMILY, THE AVERAGE AMERICAN FAMILY. THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN NOW AND THEN IS OBAMA HAS LEVERAGE BECAUSE THE BUSH TAX CUTS WERE EXPIRING. HE CUT A DEAL WITH REPUBLICANS TO EXTEND THE BUSH TAX CUTS FOR EVERYBODY BUT THE PEOPLE AT THE VERY TOP AND TO DO THIS PAYROLL TAX THING, TRUMP HAS NO SUCH LEVERAGE WITH THE DEMOCRATS. NANCY PELOSI ISN’T GOING TO PASS A PAYROLL TAX CUT AND GIVE THEM A ECONOMIC STIMULUS GOING INTO THE ELECTION.>>Sandra: VERY INTERESTING, TALK ABOUT THE ECONOMY AND HOW EXACTLY IT LOOKS. THERE ARE BIG QUESTIONS COMING FROM BOTH SIDES, BOTH SIDES ARE MAKING STRONG CASES. I WANT TO GO NOW TO THIS TALK ABOUT GREENLAND. WHAT DO YOU MAKE OF ALL THIS? NOW THE PRESIDENT SAID HE WON’T GO TO DENMARK BECAUSE THEY KIND OF SAD, HE CAN’T BE SERIOUS ABOUT THIS. SHOULD IT BE TAKEN SERIOUSLY?>>FIRST OF ALL I DON’T KNOW WHY PEOPLE ARE DISMISSING THIS, BECAUSE IT WAS A NECESSARY — IT HAD A MILITARY NECESSITY AT THE TIME. IT STRATEGICALLY PLACED AND, NOW THAT THE MILITARY REASON ISN’T THERE ANYMORE, IT HAS INCREDIBLE NATURAL RESOURCES. AND WHAT MAKES IT MORE VALUABLE IS GLOBAL WARMING. THAT’S OFF OF THE SHIPPING FROM ASIA TO THE WEST. THERE ARE BENEFITS TO GLOBAL WARMING, BUT FOR ALL THESE REASONS DENMARK MIGHT NOT WANT TO SELL BECAUSE THEY ARE SITTING ON A GOLD MINE.

Author:

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *