Roger Stone: ‘There’s No Evidence’ Of Early Wikileaks Content (Full) | Meet The Press | NBC News

Roger Stone: ‘There’s No Evidence’ Of Early Wikileaks Content (Full) | Meet The Press | NBC News


RUSSIAN OR A GERMAN OR AN
AMERICAN, IT DOESNT MATTER, AND AMERICAN, IT DOESNT MATTER, AND
THEY NEVER USED IT IS THE MAIN THEY NEVER USED IT IS THE MAIN THING. THING.>>JOINING ME NOW IS A LONG TIME>>JOINING ME NOW IS A LONG TIME REPUBLICAN OPERATIVE, AN ALLY OF
PRESIDENT TRUMP, ROGER STONE. OF PRESIDENT TRUMP, ROGER STONE.
STONE, BY THE WAY, IS THE AUTHOR STONE, BY THE WAY, IS THE AUTHOR OF A NEW BOOK “STONES RULES,” OF A NEW BOOK “STONES RULES,” MR. STONE, WELCOME TO “MEET THE
PRESS,” SIR.ELCOME TO “MEET THE PRESS,” SIR.
>>THANK YOU FOR HAVING ME,>>THANK YOU FOR HAVING ME,
CHUCK. CHUCK.>>LET ME START WITH THIS, WE>>LET ME START WITH THIS, WE LEARNED TWO ASSOCIATES HAVE BEEN
SUBPOENAED RECENTLY BY THEE BEEN SUBPOENAED RECENTLY BY THE
SPECIAL COUNSEL. SPECIAL COUNSEL.
WE KNOW PROSECUTORS HAVE BEEN WE KNOW PROSECUTORS HAVE BEEN ASKING WITNESS BEZES ABOUT YOU.
LAST TIME WE TALKED YOU SAID YOU LAST TIME WE TALKED YOU SAID YOU
HADNT BEEN INTERVIEWED BY THE HADNT BEEN INTERVIEWED BY THE
SPECIAL COUNSEL. SPECIAL COUNSEL. ARE YOU PREPARING TO BE
INDICTED?REPARING TO BE INDICTED?>>WELL, CHUCK, I DONT KNOW IF>>WELL, CHUCK, I DONT KNOW IF IM AN INTERESTING PERSON OR A
PERSON OF INTEREST.ERSON OR A PERSON OF INTEREST.
I THINK THESE LEAKS OUT OF THE I THINK THESE LEAKS OUT OF THE
SPECIAL COUNSELS OFFICE ARE SPECIAL COUNSELS OFFICE ARE
REPREHENSIBLE. REPREHENSIBLE. AT LEAST EIGHT OF MY CURRENT OR
FORMER ASSOCIATES, MOSTLY YOUNG FORMER ASSOCIATES, MOSTLY YOUNG
PEOPLE HAVE BEEN TERRORIZED BY PEOPLE HAVE BEEN TERRORIZED BY
MR. MUELLERS INVESTIGATORS. MR. MUELLERS INVESTIGATORS.
I CAN GUARANTEE YOU THEY HAVE I CAN GUARANTEE YOU THEY HAVE
FOUND NO EVIDENCE WHATSOEVER OF FOUND NO EVIDENCE WHATSOEVER OF
RUSSIAN COLLUSION NOR RUSSIAN COLLUSION NOR
TRAFFICKING OF ALLEGEDLY HACKED TRAFFICKING OF ALLEGEDLY HACKED
EMAILS WITH WIKILEAKS. EMAILS WITH WIKILEAKS.
IT IS NOT INCONCEIVABLE NOW THAT IT IS NOT INCONCEIVABLE NOW THAT
MR. MUELLER AND HIS TEAM MAY MR. MUELLER AND HIS TEAM MAY
SEEK TO CONJURE UP SOME SEEK TO CONJURE UP SOME
EXTRANEOUS CRIME PERTAINING TO EXTRANEOUS CRIME PERTAINING TO
MY BUSINESS OR MAYBE NOT EVEN MY BUSINESS OR MAYBE NOT EVEN
PERTAINING TO THE 2016 ELECTION. PERTAINING TO THE 2016 ELECTION.
I WOULD CHOCK THIS UP TO SILENCE I WOULD CHOCK THIS UP TO SILENCE
ME. ME. IVE BEEN A CRITIC ON WARS, ON IVE BEEN A CRITIC ON WARS, ON PROGRAMS LIKE THIS OF THE
EXCESSES OF THE PARTISANSHIP OF EXCESSES OF THE PARTISANSHIP OF
THE MUELLER PROBE. THE MUELLER PROBE.
SO I AM PREPARED SHOULD THAT BE SO I AM PREPARED SHOULD THAT BE
THE CASE, BUT I THINK IT JUST THE CASE, BUT I THINK IT JUST
DEMONSTRATES AGAIN, THIS WAS DEMONSTRATES AGAIN, THIS WAS
SUPPOSED TO BE ABOUT RUSSIAN SUPPOSED TO BE ABOUT RUSSIAN
COLLUSION AND IT APPEARS TO BE COLLUSION AND IT APPEARS TO BE
AN EFFORT TO SILENCE OR PUNISH AN EFFORT TO SILENCE OR PUNISH
THE PRESIDENTS SUPPORTERS AND THE PRESIDENTS SUPPORTERS AND
HIS ADVOCATES. HIS ADVOCATES.
>>I DONT KNOW HOW THIS HAS>>I DONT KNOW HOW THIS HAS
SILENCED YOU. SILENCED YOU.
YOURE NOT SOMEONE WHO IS YOURE NOT SOMEONE WHO IS
SILENCED EASILY. SILENCED EASILY.
YOU CAME HERE. YOU CAME HERE.
TO CONFIRM, YOU HAVE NOT HAD ANY TO CONFIRM, YOU HAVE NOT HAD ANY
CONTACT WITH THE SPECIAL CONTACT WITH THE SPECIAL
COUNSELS OFFICE PERSONALLY? COUNSELS OFFICE PERSONALLY?
>>THAT — THAT IS CORRECT.>>THAT — THAT IS CORRECT.
>>NOT YOUR LAWYER EITHER?>>NOT YOUR LAWYER EITHER?
>>THAT IS CORRECT.>>THAT IS CORRECT.
>>OKAY.>>OKAY.
>>ON THE OTHER HAND, SHOULD>>ON THE OTHER HAND, SHOULD
THEY DECIDE TO PROCEED AGAINST THEY DECIDE TO PROCEED AGAINST
ME FOR SOME EXTRANEOUS CRIME ME FOR SOME EXTRANEOUS CRIME
THAT I CANT IDENTIFY, PERHAPS THAT I CANT IDENTIFY, PERHAPS
WE CAN GET INTO THE QUESTION WE CAN GET INTO THE QUESTION
RAISED BY “THE NEW YORK TIMES” RAISED BY “THE NEW YORK TIMES”
ON JANUARY 20, 2017 THAT SAYS I ON JANUARY 20, 2017 THAT SAYS I
WAS THE SUBJECT OF A FISA WAS THE SUBJECT OF A FISA
WARRANT. WARRANT. FOR A U.S. CITIZEN TO BE SUBJECT
TO A FISA WARRANT THEY HAVE TOCT TO A FISA WARRANT THEY HAVE TO
BE ENGAGED IN AN ESPIONAGE ON BE ENGAGED IN AN ESPIONAGE ON
BEHALF OF A FOREIGN POWER. BEHALF OF A FOREIGN POWER.
THAT WAS CERTAINLY NOT THE CASE THAT WAS CERTAINLY NOT THE CASE
AS FAR AS I AM CONCERNED SO IM AS FAR AS I AM CONCERNED SO IM
VERY ANXIOUS TO FIEND OUT “THE VERY ANXIOUS TO FIEND OUT “THE
NEW YORK TIMES HAS NEVER NEW YORK TIMES HAS NEVER
RETRACTED THAT STORY, BY THE RETRACTED THAT STORY, BY THE
WAY. WAY. IM ANXIOUS TO FIND OUT WHY I
WOULD HAVE BEEN SUBJECT TO SUCH WOULD HAVE BEEN SUBJECT TO SUCH
A FISA WARRANT. A FISA WARRANT.
>>WELL, I THINK ONE OF THE>>WELL, I THINK ONE OF THE
AREAS OF INTEREST APPARENTLY HAS AREAS OF INTEREST APPARENTLY HAS
TO DO WITH YOUR COMMUNICATIONS TO DO WITH YOUR COMMUNICATIONS
WITH WIKI LEAKS AND VARIOUS WITH WIKI LEAKS AND VARIOUS
TWEETS YOU HAVE SAID. TWEETS YOU HAVE SAID.
SO LET ME GO DOWN THAT ROAD WITH SO LET ME GO DOWN THAT ROAD WITH
YOU. YOU. IVE ASKED YOU THIS BEFORE.
LET ME ASK YOU AGAIN HERE, DID LET ME ASK YOU AGAIN HERE, DID
YOU HAVE ANY ADVANCED KNOWLEDGE YOU HAVE ANY ADVANCED KNOWLEDGE
OF ANY KIND ABOUT JOHN PODESTAS OF ANY KIND ABOUT JOHN PODESTAS
HACKED EMAILS? HACKED EMAILS?
>>NO.>>NO.
ABSOLUTELY NOT, AND CHUCK, AN ABSOLUTELY NOT, AND CHUCK, AN
HONEST READING OF MY TWEET I HONEST READING OF MY TWEET I
SAID THE PODESTAS APOSTROPHE SAID THE PODESTAS APOSTROPHE
“S,” TIMING THE BARREL. “S,” TIMING THE BARREL.
THIS ISNT ABOUT THE APOSTROPHE, THIS ISNT ABOUT THE APOSTROPHE,
IN EVERY ACCOUNT THE WORD “THE” IN EVERY ACCOUNT THE WORD “THE”
HAS BEEN OMITTED AND IT REFERS HAS BEEN OMITTED AND IT REFERS
TO MORE THAN ONE PERSON, AS I TO MORE THAN ONE PERSON, AS I
HAVE SAID THIS BEFORE, EVEN HAVE SAID THIS BEFORE, EVEN
THOUGH YOU WANT TO REVIVE THIS THOUGH YOU WANT TO REVIVE THIS
CHESTNUT. CHESTNUT. I WAS REFERRING TO BOTH THE I WAS REFERRING TO BOTH THE PODESTA BROTHERS THAT EXPOSED PODESTA BROTHERS THAT EXPOSED THEIR SHADY BUSINESS DEALINGS IN THEIR SHADY BUSINESS DEALINGS IN RUSSIA. RUSSIA. JOHN AND TONY, THE PODESTAS,
EVEN THE FINAL REPORT OF THE EVEN THE FINAL REPORT OF THE
HOUSE INTELLIGENCE COMMITTEE HOUSE INTELLIGENCE COMMITTEE
MISTAKENLY OMITS THE WORD “THE” MISTAKENLY OMITS THE WORD “THE”
FROM MY TWEET. FROM MY TWEET.>>FAIR ENOUGH.
LET ME ASK YOU ABOUT TWEETS IN LET ME ASK YOU ABOUT TWEETS IN
THE FIRST WEEK OF OCTOBER. THE FIRST WEEK OF OCTOBER.
THEY GO THIS WAY. THEY GO THIS WAY.
>>YES.>>YES.
>>OCTOBER 2nd, ROGER STONE>>OCTOBER 2nd, ROGER STONE
WRITES WEDNESDAY, @HILLARY WRITES WEDNESDAY, @HILLARY
CLINTON IS DONE. CLINTON IS DONE.
#WIKILEAKS. #WIKILEAKS. LETS GO TO OCTOBER 3rd.
I HAVE TOTAL CONFIDENCE THAT I HAVE TOTAL CONFIDENCE THAT
WICKY LEAKS AND MY HERO JULIAN WICKY LEAKS AND MY HERO JULIAN
ASSANGE WILL EDUCATE THE ASSANGE WILL EDUCATE THE
AMERICAN PEOPLE SOON. AMERICAN PEOPLE SOON.
#LOCKHERUP. #LOCKHERUP.
LIBS THINKING ASSANGE WILL STAND LIBS THINKING ASSANGE WILL STAND
DOWN ARE WISHFUL DOWN ARE WISHFUL
THINKING, #LOCKHERUP. THINKING, #LOCKHERUP.
JULIAN ASSANGE WILL DELIVER A JULIAN ASSANGE WILL DELIVER A
DEVASTATING EXPOSE ON HILLARY AT DEVASTATING EXPOSE ON HILLARY AT
THE TIME OF HIS CHOOSING AND I THE TIME OF HIS CHOOSING AND I
STAND BY MY PREDICTION, AND THE STAND BY MY PREDICTION, AND THE
NEXT DAY IS OCTOBER 7th AND THEN NEXT DAY IS OCTOBER 7th AND THEN
THE EMAILS COME OUT. THE EMAILS COME OUT.
A FAIR READING OF THAT SUGGESTS A FAIR READING OF THAT SUGGESTS
TO ME YOU HAD SOME ADVANCED TO ME YOU HAD SOME ADVANCED
WARNING OF SOMETHING BIG COMING WARNING OF SOMETHING BIG COMING
THAT HAD TO DO WITH JOHN THAT HAD TO DO WITH JOHN
PODESTAS EMAILS. PODESTAS EMAILS.
HOW IS IT THAT THE SPECIAL HOW IS IT THAT THE SPECIAL
COUNSEL WOULDNT THINK THAT, COUNSEL WOULDNT THINK THAT,
TOO? TOO?
>>WELL, THERES NO EVIDENCE OF>>WELL, THERES NO EVIDENCE OF
THAT BECAUSE I HAD NO ADVANCED THAT BECAUSE I HAD NO ADVANCED
NOTICE OF THE CONTACT SOURCE OR NOTICE OF THE CONTACT SOURCE OR
THE EXACT DISCLOSURE TIME OF THE THE EXACT DISCLOSURE TIME OF THE
WIKILEAKS DISCLOSURES. WIKILEAKS DISCLOSURES.
A SAFRMG HIMSELF HAS SAID SO. A SAFRMG HIMSELF HAS SAID SO.
ASSANGE HAS SAID IN HIS OWN ASSANGE HAS SAID IN HIS OWN
TWEETS AND IN INTERVIEWS THAT TWEETS AND IN INTERVIEWS THAT
ROGER STONE NEVER PREDICTED ROGER STONE NEVER PREDICTED
ANYTHING THAT I HADNT ALREADY ANYTHING THAT I HADNT ALREADY
SAID IN PUBLIC. SAID IN PUBLIC.
ADDITIONALLY, ASSANGE WENT ON ADDITIONALLY, ASSANGE WENT ON
CNN IN JUNE AND SAID HE HAD A CNN IN JUNE AND SAID HE HAD A
TREASURE TROVE OF MATERIAL ON TREASURE TROVE OF MATERIAL ON
HILLARY, AND IVE BEEN VERY HILLARY, AND IVE BEEN VERY
FORTHRIGHT AND TESTIFIED FORTHRIGHT AND TESTIFIED
COMPLETELY AND HONESTLY BEFORE COMPLETELY AND HONESTLY BEFORE
THE HOUSE INTELLIGENCE COMMITTEE THE HOUSE INTELLIGENCE COMMITTEE
THAT I DID HAVE A SOURCE WHO THAT I DID HAVE A SOURCE WHO
TOLD ME THAT ASSANGE REALLY HAD TOLD ME THAT ASSANGE REALLY HAD
WHAT HE SAID HE WOULD HAVE AND WHAT HE SAID HE WOULD HAVE AND
THAT IT WOULD BE DELIVERED IN THAT IT WOULD BE DELIVERED IN
OCTOBER CONSISTENT WITH THOSE OCTOBER CONSISTENT WITH THOSE
TWEETS. TWEETS.
THERE IS NO EVIDENCE TO THE THERE IS NO EVIDENCE TO THE
CONTRARY THAT I HAD ADVANCED CONTRARY THAT I HAD ADVANCED
NOTICE. NOTICE. CHUCK, WED BEEN DOWN THIS ROAD
BEFORE AND I ANSWERED THESEOAD BEFORE AND I ANSWERED THESE
QUESTIONS FOR YOU PREVIOUSLY. QUESTIONS FOR YOU PREVIOUSLY.
>>I UNDERSTAND.>>I UNDERSTAND. YOUVE BEEN VERY SPECIFIC WITH YOUVE BEEN VERY SPECIFIC WITH YOUR DENIAL. YOUR DENIAL. I HAD NO — I HAD NO AWARENESS
OF THE CONTENT AND THE SOURCE, OF THE CONTENT AND THE SOURCE,
BUT YOU HAD AN AWARENESS, AND BUT YOU HAD AN AWARENESS, AND
YOU SEEM TO HAVE SOME — YOU YOU SEEM TO HAVE SOME — YOU
SEEM TO BE VERY SPECIFIC WITH SEEM TO BE VERY SPECIFIC WITH
THE DENIAL. THE DENIAL.
EXPLAIN THAT SPECIFICITY. EXPLAIN THAT SPECIFICITY.
>>SURE.>>SURE. ITS VERY SIMPLE. ITS VERY SIMPLE. ALL ONE HAS TO DO IS FOLLOW
JULIAN ASSANGES TWEETS AND SET JULIAN ASSANGES TWEETS AND SET
A GOOGLE NEWS TWEET FOR JULIAN A GOOGLE NEWS TWEET FOR JULIAN
ASSANGE AND READ EVERY INTERVIEW ASSANGE AND READ EVERY INTERVIEW
HES GIVEN AND EVERYTHING THAT I HES GIVEN AND EVERYTHING THAT I
PREDICTED IS CONTAINED IN HIS PREDICTED IS CONTAINED IN HIS
PUBLIC COMMENTS. PUBLIC COMMENTS.
IF THERE IS NO EVIDENCE IF THERE IS NO EVIDENCE
WHATSOEVER THAT I HAD ADVANCED WHATSOEVER THAT I HAD ADVANCED
KNOWLEDGE OF THE CONTENT OR KNOWLEDGE OF THE CONTENT OR
SOURCE OF THIS MATERIAL. SOURCE OF THIS MATERIAL.
I RECEIVED NOTHING FROM I RECEIVED NOTHING FROM
WIKILEAKS OR FROM THE RUSSIANS. WIKILEAKS OR FROM THE RUSSIANS.
I PASSED NOTHING ON TO DONALD I PASSED NOTHING ON TO DONALD
TRUMP OR THE TRUMP CAMPAIGN. TRUMP OR THE TRUMP CAMPAIGN.
WEVE BEEN THROUGH THIS AD WEVE BEEN THROUGH THIS AD
NAUSEAM. NAUSEAM. IT IS A WILD GOOSE CHASE.
>>ARE YOU 100% CONFIDENT THAT>>ARE YOU 100% CONFIDENT THAT
JULIAN ASSANGE HAS NOTHING TO DO JULIAN ASSANGE HAS NOTHING TO DO
WITH THE RUSSIANS OR RUSSIAN WITH THE RUSSIANS OR RUSSIAN
GOVERNMENT OR ANY SORT OF GOVERNMENT OR ANY SORT OF RUSSIAN ASSOCIATE? RUSSIAN ASSOCIATE?>>FIRST OF ALL, I DONT EVEN>>FIRST OF ALL, I DONT EVEN BELIEVE THE DEMOCRATIC NATIONAL BELIEVE THE DEMOCRATIC NATIONAL COMMITTEE WAS HACKED BASED ON COMMITTEE WAS HACKED BASED ON THE ARTICLE I READ IN THE NATION
MAGAZINE.LE I READ IN THE NATION MAGAZINE.>>JOHN PODESTAS EMAIL HIS
NOTHING TO DO WITH THE DNC, BY NOTHING TO DO WITH THE DNC, BY
THE WAY. THE WAY.
THEY WERENT PART OF THE DNC THEY WERENT PART OF THE DNC
HACK. HACK.>>AGAIN, I NEVER PREDICTED THE
DISCLOSURES OF JOHN PODESTASTHE DISCLOSURES OF JOHN PODESTAS
EMAILS. EMAILS. THERE DOES NEED TO BE SOME
CONTEXT THOUGH, CHUCK.SOME CONTEXT THOUGH, CHUCK.
AT THE TIME THE CLINTON PEOPLE AT THE TIME THE CLINTON PEOPLE
WERE ACTIVELY PROMOTING AMONG WERE ACTIVELY PROMOTING AMONG
MEMBERS OF AND MANY OF YOUR MEMBERS OF AND MANY OF YOUR
COLLEAGUES, PAUL MANAFORTS COLLEAGUES, PAUL MANAFORTS
BUSINESS ACTIVITIES IN EASTERN BUSINESS ACTIVITIES IN EASTERN
EUROPE, THE ACTIVITIES OF JOHN EUROPE, THE ACTIVITIES OF JOHN
AND TONY PODESTA WERE ALREADY AND TONY PODESTA WERE ALREADY
PUBLIC HAVING BEEN PUBLISHED IN PUBLIC HAVING BEEN PUBLISHED IN
THE PANAMA PAPERS. THE PANAMA PAPERS.
THERE IS NO EVIDENCE THAT I KNEW THERE IS NO EVIDENCE THAT I KNEW
ABOUT THE ACCESSING BY WIKILEAKS ABOUT THE ACCESSING BY WIKILEAKS
OF JOHN PODESTAS EMAIL OR THEIR OF JOHN PODESTAS EMAIL OR THEIR
PUBLICATIONS IN ADVANCE. PUBLICATIONS IN ADVANCE.
NO EVIDENCE WHATSOEVER. NO EVIDENCE WHATSOEVER.
>>BEFORE I LET YOU GO, I WANT>>BEFORE I LET YOU GO, I WANT
TO ASK YOU ABOUT A COMMENT YOU TO ASK YOU ABOUT A COMMENT YOU
GAVE TO THE NEW YORK TIMES LAST GAVE TO THE NEW YORK TIMES LAST
MONTH ABOUT MICHAEL COHEN AND MONTH ABOUT MICHAEL COHEN AND
YOU SAID THIS, DONALD GOES OUT YOU SAID THIS, DONALD GOES OUT
OF HIS WAY TO TREAT HIM LIKE OF HIS WAY TO TREAT HIM LIKE
GARBAGE. GARBAGE.
EXPLAIN WHAT YOU MEANT BY THAT. EXPLAIN WHAT YOU MEANT BY THAT.
>>WELL, MICHAEL COHEN WANTED>>WELL, MICHAEL COHEN WANTED
VERY MUCH TO BE IN POLITICS. VERY MUCH TO BE IN POLITICS.
HE WANTED TO BE IN THE CAMPAIGN. HE WANTED TO BE IN THE CAMPAIGN.
HE WANTED TO BE IN THE HE WANTED TO BE IN THE
ADMINISTRATION. ADMINISTRATION.
HE HAS NOT ACHIEVED ANY OF THOSE HE HAS NOT ACHIEVED ANY OF THOSE
THINGS. THINGS.
I DONT THINK THE PRESIDENT I DONT THINK THE PRESIDENT
REGARDED HIM AS A POLITICAL REGARDED HIM AS A POLITICAL
GENIUS OR WAS OPEN TO HIS GENIUS OR WAS OPEN TO HIS
DESIRES IN THAT AREA, AND HE HAD DESIRES IN THAT AREA, AND HE HAD
A TENDENCY TO DISCOUNT ANY A TENDENCY TO DISCOUNT ANY
POLITICAL ADVICE THAT MICHAEL POLITICAL ADVICE THAT MICHAEL
WOULD GIVE HIM. WOULD GIVE HIM.
WHAT MR. COHEN HAS AND HAS NOT WHAT MR. COHEN HAS AND HAS NOT
DONE FOR THE PRESIDENT, I HAVE DONE FOR THE PRESIDENT, I HAVE
NO WAY OF KNOWING, CHUCK. NO WAY OF KNOWING, CHUCK.
IM NOT AN ATTORNEY NOR WAS I IM NOT AN ATTORNEY NOR WAS I
PRIVY TO ANY OF THOSE INTERNAL PRIVY TO ANY OF THOSE INTERNAL
DEALINGS. DEALINGS.>>DO YOU THINK HE SHOULD HAVE
SOMETHING TO FEAR FROM MICHAEL SOMETHING TO FEAR FROM MICHAEL
COHEN BECAUSE OF THE WAY HE COHEN BECAUSE OF THE WAY HE TREATED HIM?
>>IVE BEEN IN POLITICS FOR 40>>IVE BEEN IN POLITICS FOR 40
YEARS. YEARS. I KNOW ENOUGH NOT TO ANSWER I KNOW ENOUGH NOT TO ANSWER HYPOTHETICAL QUESTIONS. HYPOTHETICAL QUESTIONS.>>ROGER STONE, I WILL LEAVE IT>>ROGER STONE, I WILL LEAVE IT THERE. THERE. THANK YOU FOR COMING ON. THANK YOU FOR COMING ON. I APPRECIATE IT AND I WILL TRY

Author:

100 thoughts on “Roger Stone: ‘There’s No Evidence’ Of Early Wikileaks Content (Full) | Meet The Press | NBC News”

  • Tramaine Terrance says:

    Whats up, Humans? Most humans want friends. What humans don't want is, a life of problems. The more humans you have in your life, the more likely you'll deal with emotional problems.

    TERRANCE OUT

  • Robert Sanders says:

    Every word this guy says is total B.S… lie until you get caught. That’s the whole administration’s plan

  • Get off of this left and right paradigm you idiots. We’re 21 trillion dollars in debt and 95 percent of you don’t even know what the federal reserve is. Sigh, you Brian washed sheep!

  • I can't wait to see all the spliced together clips of all trumps minions spewing 'no collusion' after all the sentencings.

  • Cast shade on all the "others" you want to. You are still going to prison just like spanky and cohen. deal with it, Rog.

  • 0:52
    i know this man to be a liar now
    instinctually… just as i have known what the trump is since that first GOP debate
    any who believe otherwise, know this, if you dare say so, you are marked, as ''trumpanzie''

  • donald peters says:

    all this traitor keeps saying is "there is no evidence" never "I didn't do it". another trump crony looting the country. peace

  • Kimberley Morris says:

    Why is everyone who knows Trump either plastic if they women or Orange and have a stupid hairstyle if they are men???

  • Fritz Fondona says:

    And the Trumpery loyalists will
    BELIEVE baby: just BELIEVE, what we tell you to BELIEVE TODAY.
    For tomorrow, what you BELIEVE will change.

    And remember that the First Amendment guarantees “FREEDOM OF RELIGION: Not Freedom From Religion”

  • athena icaria says:

    The cowering Trumpists are blaming the victims, a standard tactic used by rapists and dirty politicians.when their they are caught with their pants down.

  • What I want to know is why these fools think that going on these shows putting more and more public statements out that they will have to answer for will keep them from prison? These tools are in bed with a foreign hostile power and have been under surveillance/investigation for years now. All intelligence agencies have evidence of their contacts with shady characters. Every denial and lie about all meetings with Russians are known to FBI, CIA, NSA and more. Trump will WISH he was in a situation like Watergate. Trump family is going down over this. Kushner family is going down over this. The entire GOP is going down over this. There is a reason why Ryan, Nunes and more are trying to ignore Russian meddling in favor of Trump as facts. US was attacked by Russia. POTUS refuses to acknowledge this as fact. Why? He says it's made up by democrats. The Democrats faked Russian meddling to attack Trump? Trump's next story will be that the Democrats and Russia colluded to impeach him……..I'm rubber you're glue strategy will only get worse for Trump.

  • dodge driver says:

    stone is awesome ,,,,, Hillary , obama , both taking a dive soon …. putting political opponents under surveillance , by using our government agencies …. unprecedented destruction ahead ,,, one political party will survive ,

  • Still ignoring the Russian uranium deal! Clintons and Obama are obvious traitors! Nazi tactic to accuse people of what they have done themselves tying things down in procedure and wasting time and resources absolutely ridiculous! DOJ Lynch FBI Comey walking away free as a bird! Hypothetical questions lead to speculation so do an investigation over nothing!

  • I'm just sayin' says:

    Okay, all you body language experts, count the number of times he blinks his eyes with each question. You'd think he would have conquered that by now. Can't fix stupid!!!

  • Jessy Girard says:

    I'm not gonna click on anything CHUCK.Good interview.To bad your a piece of shit.I hurd you say you did not now what to say to your kid about the Predident's attack.I dont know how hold he is but maybe he already understand whats going on CHUCK.Y-o-u-r a
    p-i-e-c-e o-f s-h-i-t.And thats too bad cause your good at what you do BUT y-o-u-r a p-i-e-c-e o-f s-h-i-t.
    You should help us make the world great.It as NOTHING to do with color.Ideologies yes but not color.We need to go to the stars and soon.Help us.You hate lies?How about you destroy those flat earther's?Or how about muslim's and slavery,modern slavery to?Wake up CHUCK!

  • Stone ate Chuck’s lunch. He probably won’t be asked back on because NBC only likes wimpy Republicans on their programs.

  • Its amazing that people talk about the alleged hacking of the emails, yet completely ignore the heinous crimes seen within the emails.

  • I stand with Stone. Are you all going to not even READ what was in the wikileaks emails???? Earth shattering.

  • Happy Dee Dee says:

    This guy is doing everything to be a part of "the action." The question is WHY??? Is he a diversion for Trumps dirty laundry or is he simply nuts? Peace friend ❤

  • It's too late. The Deep State has been exposed, as has their puppet media. CNN MSN, Facebook is done. The corpse is still warm, but what does that matter?

  • The accountant knows and will not do jail time for you Roger. I told you they were coming for you, sooner than you thought. They are building a case big enough to make a presidential padrone an impossibility, otherwise you Rodger would already be in jail.

  • Ross Black Isle and Dublin says:

    This is what it looks like when a lost bus driver needs directions from someone on the bus to tell him where he's been and then where he needs to go…

  • There were boatloads of speculation that Wikileaks would publish some kind of October Surprise on Hillary. Especially since Wikileaks had been promising juicy stuff for months. Assange even kept people up late waiting for stuff that he promised that never arrived, getting people ticked off for wasted sleep

  • Claudy TheArtist says:

    Stone looks like he was dropped at birth … This Gangster is part of the Organized Crime Syndicate that’s taken over the Oval Office… They now turn to destroy the Law Enforcement that pursues them… Amazing!

  • Claudy TheArtist says:

    Stone is psychic simple and honestly… Now watch him squirm! We get it and these Gangsters are so clever just not clever enough and fall just slightly short…

  • Chuck Todd asks Roger Stone, "Did you have advanced knowledge of WikiLeaks releasing Podesta emails in October 2016 ?" At that time news alternative outlets were buzzing in anticipation of wikileaks "October Surprise" Roger Stone capitalized on rumors that the MSN was ignoring The majority of American voters were fully expecting it. By the way, The DNC will prop up Jesuit trained "Pedo Joe Biden" for POTUS 2020. No joke, spread the word. God's speed to y'all.

  • …Dumbo Trump and his republictard followers are all going down like the Titanic! Stone is just rearranging the deck chairs too little too late!…

  • He's a friend of alex jones then what do u expect?!!! These Frauds will share a cell in jail, soon…. In federal prison Must prepare a cell for Trump, stone, alex jones, manafort, Giuliani, Kushner, trump jr & putin…. For ivanka different cell in female section

  • Roger stone is a hack who loves roger stone and Roger stone only. When his orange pie hole is open it is lying. This hair plug Nixon tattoo lover has a woody every time he gets interviewed by a REAL news outlet. Fake tan white trash. Roger please stop breathing my AIR.

  • Blinky Mc Lying Sack Stone oozes BS out of ever orifice.

    https://www.contactomagazine.com/articles/liarsigns0808.htm
    A person who is lying will blink a lot,as blinking seems to correlate to the amount of mental stress we are under.

  • ThomasTheSailor Chubby says:

    No proof is NO PROOF. . Are they gonna find some, or just yank our chains.? I'm tired of hearing false crap..

  • altitude illume says:

    #TRUMPutinTROLLARMY attacking here; RED-ALLIANCE: RUSSIA-CHINA-SLAVE N.K..
    lol, when trump is gone, we set the dog's on some hot trails. run, RED, run.
    #trumpsBIGREDSALE to china. wtf, #TRUMPTREASONGROWS

  • Seeker2 Above says:

    He doesn’t look like a happy man. Wonder what is the real truth. The FISA and WHO ordered and how it was ordered is the BIG question.
    VERY INTERESTING. I have confidence it will all come out.

  • THE DEEP STATE IS REAL! Make no mistake about it, they will destroy anyone who tries to change the system. This is not only a warning to President Trump, but a warning to anyone coming from the outside.

  • Voice Of Reason says:

    There isn't one sliver of evidence that the emails were hacked.. so why is it said over and over again like it is the truth? Propaganda

  • Voice Of Reason says:

    For anyone who actually read the emails, Julian Assange is a hero.. For those that didn't read the emails, you might as well be blind.

  • Watchmantoday Vaughn says:

    Everybody Remember that the satanic nwo is going to try and base on the rule of their law and ignore the Spirit of the law and TRUTH !!!

  • Marc Cannizzo says:

    Mueller must be getting close. Through their language one can see that people like Stone are defecating in their trousers.

  • Nelson Guzman says:

    I can tell you what you are Mr. Carpet Head, a person of interest, not a interesting person. A proven liar, a megaphone for fraudulent and vile human beings like Alex Jones and Donald Trump.

  • Noreen Mountain says:

    Doesn't this pinhead Stone think anyone being questioned by law enforcement would be scared? Somehow, when his people have to go through it they were "terrorized". They all think they're above the law. Boo hoo

  • The Omega Man says:

    This whole Russian collusion is blowing up in Mueller’s face. What a joke now from the three stooges Mueller Rosenstien and Comey

  • Dennis Menace says:

    Rodger The Dodger.
    Another one of mad, fat Alex's British minions peddling their BS. He said he was poisoned and a car tried to mow him down not so long ago. I'm English an he's an embarrassment to Queen and country. That said he is a proper gizza just trying to duck n dive and make a few quid for a better life, so best of luck to him

  • Charles Nelson says:

    Stone just used that interview to entirely put out the truth…you could see the interviewer squirming powerlessly. What a worker.

  • Roger Stone is so innocent that he repetively kept tweeting about how soon Wikileaks were gonna release those emails

  • I can see why Mindless Zombies watch NBC News… all NBC does is spread nonsense with Absolutely No Evidence !!

  • Midnight Rambler says:

    It’s fascinating that the left are disinterested in the podista Russian connections.. time for a special investigation into the democrat crime group

  • RussiaTrumpHoax says:

    If they can call him a Russian agent for tweeting, then they can call anyone a Russian agent for tweeting. The information was available from Julian Assange himself, the whole MSM knows this was public information.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *