NBC News Exclusive: Comey Gives First Interview Since Mueller Completed Report | NBC Nightly News

NBC News Exclusive: Comey Gives First Interview Since Mueller Completed Report | NBC Nightly News


BETWEEN RUSSIA AND THE TRUMP CAMPAIGN DESPITE THE REPORT’S CAMPAIGN DESPITE THE REPORT’S FINDINGS. FINDINGS. AND THAT’S WHERE WE BEGAN. AND THAT’S WHERE WE BEGAN. LET’S START WITH WHAT WE THINK LET’S START WITH WHAT WE THINK ARE THE CONCLUSIONS OF THE ARE THE CONCLUSIONS OF THE MUELLER REPORT, THAT ON THE MUELLER REPORT, THAT ON THE CENTRAL QUESTION OF COLLUSION, CENTRAL QUESTION OF COLLUSION, IT DIDN’T FIND IT. IT DIDN’T FIND IT. YOU’VE LED THIS INVESTIGATION YOU’VE LED THIS INVESTIGATION FROM THE START. FROM THE START. YOU STUNNED WHEN YOU HEARD THAT? YOU STUNNED WHEN YOU HEARD THAT? DID YOU EXPECT IT? DID YOU EXPECT IT?>>NO, I DIDN’T KNOW WHAT ANSWER>>NO, I DIDN’T KNOW WHAT ANSWER THE SPECIAL COUNSEL WOULD ARRIVE THE SPECIAL COUNSEL WOULD ARRIVE AT. AT. WHEN I WAS FIRED, WE HADN’T WHEN I WAS FIRED, WE HADN’T FINISHED THE WORK, SO I DIDN’T FINISHED THE WORK, SO I DIDN’T KNOW WHAT CONCLUSION IT WOULD KNOW WHAT CONCLUSION IT WOULD END UP AT. END UP AT. I THINK IT’S GOOD THAT HE WAS I THINK IT’S GOOD THAT HE WAS ABLE TO FINISH THE WORK AND ABLE TO FINISH THE WORK AND ESTABLISH BOTH THAT THE RUSSIA ESTABLISH BOTH THAT THE RUSSIA THING WASN’T A HOAX, THAT THE THING WASN’T A HOAX, THAT THE HUSBANDS INTERFERED IN THE HUSBANDS INTERFERED IN THE ELECTION IN A HUGE WAY, AND ELECTION IN A HUGE WAY, AND THAT’S REALLY IMPORTANT, AND THAT’S REALLY IMPORTANT, AND ANOTHER PIECE OF GOOD NEWS, THE ANOTHER PIECE OF GOOD NEWS, THE EVIDENCE DIDN’T ESTABLISH THAT EVIDENCE DIDN’T ESTABLISH THAT ANY AMERICANS CONSPIRED AS PART ANY AMERICANS CONSPIRED AS PART OF THAT EFFORT. OF THAT EFFORT. THAT SHOULD BE GOOD NEWS NO THAT SHOULD BE GOOD NEWS NO MATTER WHAT PARTY YOU’RE MATTER WHAT PARTY YOU’RE ASSOCIATED WITH. ASSOCIATED WITH.>>WAS IT GOOD NEWS FOR THE>>WAS IT GOOD NEWS FOR THE INVESTIGATION THAT YOU STARTED? INVESTIGATION THAT YOU STARTED? DID YOU GO BACK AFTER HEARING DID YOU GO BACK AFTER HEARING THIS AND SAY, MAYBE THERE WASN’T THIS AND SAY, MAYBE THERE WASN’T A THERE THERE LIKE I THOUGHT? A THERE THERE LIKE I THOUGHT?>>NO, THE INVESTIGATION HAD TO>>NO, THE INVESTIGATION HAD TO HAPPENED. HAPPENED. IT WOULD HAVE BEEN IRRESPONSIBLE IT WOULD HAVE BEEN IRRESPONSIBLE NOT TO INVESTIGATE. NOT TO INVESTIGATE. AND WE DON’T INVESTIGATE, AND WE DON’T INVESTIGATE, DESPITE WHAT THE PARTISANS SAY, DESPITE WHAT THE PARTISANS SAY, TO FIND A PARTICULAR RESULT. TO FIND A PARTICULAR RESULT. WE INVESTIGATE TO FIND OUT WE INVESTIGATE TO FIND OUT WHAT’S TRUE, AND AS BEST I CAN WHAT’S TRUE, AND AS BEST I CAN TELL, LOOKS LIKE BOB MUELLER WAS TELL, LOOKS LIKE BOB MUELLER WAS ALLOWED TO DO THAT, AND THAT’S A ALLOWED TO DO THAT, AND THAT’S A GREAT THING. GREAT THING.>>WHEN YOU WERE INVOLVED,>>WHEN YOU WERE INVOLVED, THOUGH, DID YOU THINK IT WAS THOUGH, DID YOU THINK IT WAS GOING TO LEAD TO SOMETHING? GOING TO LEAD TO SOMETHING? WERE YOU CONVINCED IN YOUR MIND WERE YOU CONVINCED IN YOUR MIND THERE WAS A STRONG POSSIBILITY THERE WAS A STRONG POSSIBILITY THIS CAMPAIGN, THIS PRESIDENTIAL THIS CAMPAIGN, THIS PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATE AT THE TIME, WAS CANDIDATE AT THE TIME, WAS COLLUDING WITH RUSSIA? COLLUDING WITH RUSSIA?>>I REALLY DIDN’T KNOW.>>I REALLY DIDN’T KNOW. THERE WAS SMOKE AND ENOUGH SMOKE THERE WAS SMOKE AND ENOUGH SMOKE TO JUSTIFY INVESTIGATING. TO JUSTIFY INVESTIGATING. OBVIOUSLY THERE WAS OVERWHELMING OBVIOUSLY THERE WAS OVERWHELMING EVIDENCE THE RUSSIANS WERE EVIDENCE THE RUSSIANS WERE INTERFERING IN THE ELECTION TO INTERFERING IN THE ELECTION TO HURT ONE CANDIDATE AND HE WANTED HURT ONE CANDIDATE AND HE WANTED OTHER. OTHER. WHETHER AMERICANS WERE WHETHER AMERICANS WERE CONSPIRING WITH HIM, I DIDN’T CONSPIRING WITH HIM, I DIDN’T KNOW BUT WE HAD TO LOOK AT THAT. KNOW BUT WE HAD TO LOOK AT THAT.>>DO YOU TAKE THIS AS A REBUKE>>DO YOU TAKE THIS AS A REBUKE OF YOU AND YOUR LEADERSHIP AND OF YOU AND YOUR LEADERSHIP AND THE FBI? THE FBI?>>NO, I SEE IT THE OTHER WAY.>>NO, I SEE IT THE OTHER WAY. IT ESTABLISHES TO ALL PEOPLE, I IT ESTABLISHES TO ALL PEOPLE, I HOPE NO MATTER WHERE THEY ARE ON HOPE NO MATTER WHERE THEY ARE ON THE SPECTRUM, THAT THE FBI IS THE SPECTRUM, THAT THE FBI IS NOT CORRUPT, NOT A NEST OF NOT CORRUPT, NOT A NEST OF VIPERS AND SPIES, BUT AN HONEST VIPERS AND SPIES, BUT AN HONEST GROUP OF PEOPLE TRYING TO FIND GROUP OF PEOPLE TRYING TO FIND OUT WHAT IS TRUE. OUT WHAT IS TRUE. AND THAT’S WHAT YOU SEE HERE. AND THAT’S WHAT YOU SEE HERE. THAT’S WHY IT WILL BE IMPORTANT THAT’S WHY IT WILL BE IMPORTANT TO READ THE ENTIRE REPORT. TO READ THE ENTIRE REPORT. BASED ON WHAT I’VE SEEN, THIS IS BASED ON WHAT I’VE SEEN, THIS IS A GOOD THING. A GOOD THING. PARTS OF THE REPORT ARE PARTS OF THE REPORT ARE CONFUSING. CONFUSING. BUT THIS IS A GOOD THING. BUT THIS IS A GOOD THING.>>YOU GO AROUND CHANNELS AND>>YOU GO AROUND CHANNELS AND YOU SEE A LOT OF PEOPLE SAYING YOU SEE A LOT OF PEOPLE SAYING THE COUNTRY HAS BEEN THROUGH THE COUNTRY HAS BEEN THROUGH HELL FOR THE LAST TWO YEARS AND HELL FOR THE LAST TWO YEARS AND QUESTION OF WAS IT WORTH IT? QUESTION OF WAS IT WORTH IT? YOU SEEM TO BE SAYING IT WAS YOU SEEM TO BE SAYING IT WAS WORTH IT? WORTH IT?>>YEAH.>>YEAH. I DON’T KNOW WHAT PEOPLE ARE I DON’T KNOW WHAT PEOPLE ARE THINKING SAYING WE SHOULDN’T THINKING SAYING WE SHOULDN’T HAVE INVESTIGATED. HAVE INVESTIGATED. REMEMBER WHERE THIS STARTED. REMEMBER WHERE THIS STARTED. LATE JULY OF THE ELECTION YEAR, LATE JULY OF THE ELECTION YEAR, WE KNEW THE RUSSIANS WERE WE KNEW THE RUSSIANS WERE ENGAGED IN A MASSIVE EFFORT TO ENGAGED IN A MASSIVE EFFORT TO HURT HILLARY CLINTON AND HELP HURT HILLARY CLINTON AND HELP DONALD TRUMP. DONALD TRUMP. AND THEN WE LEARN THAT A TRUMP AND THEN WE LEARN THAT A TRUMP CAMPAIGN ADVISER HAD SPOKEN TO A CAMPAIGN ADVISER HAD SPOKEN TO A RUSSIAN OPERATIVE ABOUT THE DIRT RUSSIAN OPERATIVE ABOUT THE DIRT THEY HAD ON HILLARY CLINTON. THEY HAD ON HILLARY CLINTON. BEFORE ANY OF US KNEW ANYTHING BEFORE ANY OF US KNEW ANYTHING ABOUT IT. ABOUT IT. HOW ON EARTH WOULD THE FBI LEAVE HOW ON EARTH WOULD THE FBI LEAVE THAT ALONE? THAT ALONE?>>THE PRESIDENT IS TAKING THE>>THE PRESIDENT IS TAKING THE MUELLER NEWS AS COMPLETE MUELLER NEWS AS COMPLETE VINDICATION. VINDICATION.>>IT WAS JUST ANNOUNCED, THERE>>IT WAS JUST ANNOUNCED, THERE WAS NO COLLUSION WITH RUSSIA. WAS NO COLLUSION WITH RUSSIA.>>HE’S MAKING IT BASED ON A>>HE’S MAKING IT BASED ON A PRETTY BOLD CLAIM IN THAT PRETTY BOLD CLAIM IN THAT FOUR-PAGE LETTER WE GOT FROM FOUR-PAGE LETTER WE GOT FROM ATTORNEY GENERAL BARR, THERE WAS ATTORNEY GENERAL BARR, THERE WAS NO COLLUSION. NO COLLUSION. THE LANGUAGE WAS PRETTY CLEAR THE LANGUAGE WAS PRETTY CLEAR THERE WAS NOTHING BETWEEN THIS THERE WAS NOTHING BETWEEN THIS CAMPAIGN AND RUSSIA. CAMPAIGN AND RUSSIA. SO ON THAT BASIS SHOULD HE BE SO ON THAT BASIS SHOULD HE BE BREATHING A SIGH OF RELIEF? BREATHING A SIGH OF RELIEF?>>I DON’T KNOW THAT I READ THE>>I DON’T KNOW THAT I READ THE LETTER FROM THE ATTORNEY GENERAL LETTER FROM THE ATTORNEY GENERAL THAT WAY. THAT WAY. I READ HIM AS SAYING, THE I READ HIM AS SAYING, THE SPECIAL COUNSEL DIDN’T FIND THAT SPECIAL COUNSEL DIDN’T FIND THAT THE EVIDENCE ESTABLISHED THAT THE EVIDENCE ESTABLISHED THAT THERE WAS ANY CONSPIRACY BETWEEN THERE WAS ANY CONSPIRACY BETWEEN AN AMERICAN AND THE RUSSIANS. AN AMERICAN AND THE RUSSIANS. WHAT EARTH EVIDENCE THERE IS, WHAT EARTH EVIDENCE THERE IS, WHAT EVIDENCE THERE MIGHT BE WHAT EVIDENCE THERE MIGHT BE THAT FALLS SHORT OF THAT THAT FALLS SHORT OF THAT STANDARD, I HAVE NO IDEA. STANDARD, I HAVE NO IDEA.>>ESTABLISH IS THE WORD YOU’RE>>ESTABLISH IS THE WORD YOU’RE HONING ON THERE? HONING ON THERE?>>CORRECT.>>CORRECT. I DON’T KNOW WHAT THE SPECIAL I DON’T KNOW WHAT THE SPECIAL COUNSEL FOUND, AND I’M PREPARED, COUNSEL FOUND, AND I’M PREPARED, I HOPE EVERYBODY IS, TO WAIT AND I HOPE EVERYBODY IS, TO WAIT AND GET THE TRANSPARENCY THAT WE GET THE TRANSPARENCY THAT WE NEED. NEED.>>THEN THERE’S THE OBSTRUCTION>>THEN THERE’S THE OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE ISSUE AND THAT TWEET OF JUSTICE ISSUE AND THAT TWEET FROM COMEY JUST THIS WEEKEND. FROM COMEY JUST THIS WEEKEND. STANDING IN THE WOODS, SO MANY STANDING IN THE WOODS, SO MANY QUESTIONS. QUESTIONS. WHAT ARE YOUR QUESTIONS? WHAT ARE YOUR QUESTIONS?>>THEY’RE ALL ABOUT THE>>THEY’RE ALL ABOUT THE OBSTRUCTION PIECE. OBSTRUCTION PIECE. OBVIOUSLY I WANT AND I THINK THE OBVIOUSLY I WANT AND I THINK THE AMERICAN PEOPLE SHOULD WANT AMERICAN PEOPLE SHOULD WANT TRANSPARENCY ON THE SO-CALLED TRANSPARENCY ON THE SO-CALLED CONSPIRACY PIECE. CONSPIRACY PIECE. THE OBSTRUCTION PIECE CONFUSES THE OBSTRUCTION PIECE CONFUSES ME. ME. I THINK BOTH DIRECTOR MUELLER I THINK BOTH DIRECTOR MUELLER ATTORNEY GENERAL BARR ARE ATTORNEY GENERAL BARR ARE ENTITLED TO THE BENEFIT OF THE ENTITLED TO THE BENEFIT OF THE DOUBT. DOUBT.>>LET’S UNPACK IT HERE.>>LET’S UNPACK IT HERE. MR. MUELLER DECIDES NOT TO MAKE MR. MUELLER DECIDES NOT TO MAKE A JUDGMENT ON THAT PARTICULAR A JUDGMENT ON THAT PARTICULAR ISSUE. ISSUE. DOES THAT ALONE SURPRISE YOU? DOES THAT ALONE SURPRISE YOU?>>IT DOES.>>IT DOES. THE PURPOSE OF THE SPECIAL THE PURPOSE OF THE SPECIAL COUNSEL IS TO MAKE SURE THAT THE COUNSEL IS TO MAKE SURE THAT THE POLITICALS, IN THIS CASE THE POLITICALS, IN THIS CASE THE ATTORNEY GENERAL, DOESN’T MAKE ATTORNEY GENERAL, DOESN’T MAKE THE ULTIMATE CALL ON WHETHER THE THE ULTIMATE CALL ON WHETHER THE SUBJECT OF THE INVESTIGATION, SUBJECT OF THE INVESTIGATION, THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES, SHOULD BE HELD STATES, SHOULD BE HELD CRIMINALLY LIABLE FOR ACTIVITIES CRIMINALLY LIABLE FOR ACTIVITIES THAT WERE UNDER INVESTIGATION. THAT WERE UNDER INVESTIGATION. AND SO THE IDEA THAT A SPECIAL AND SO THE IDEA THAT A SPECIAL COUNSEL WOULDN’T REACH THE COUNSEL WOULDN’T REACH THE QUESTION AND HAND IT TO THE QUESTION AND HAND IT TO THE POLITICAL LEADERSHIP DOESN’T POLITICAL LEADERSHIP DOESN’T MAKE SENSE. MAKE SENSE. I’M NOT PREJUDGING IT, I’M I’M NOT PREJUDGING IT, I’M SAYING IT DOESN’T MAKE SENSE ON SAYING IT DOESN’T MAKE SENSE ON ITS FACE, SO I HAVE A LOT OF ITS FACE, SO I HAVE A LOT OF QUESTIONS. QUESTIONS.>>DO YOU THINK IT WAS MR.>>DO YOU THINK IT WAS MR. MUELLER’S RESPONSIBILITY TO COME MUELLER’S RESPONSIBILITY TO COME TO A DETERMINATION ON THAT TO A DETERMINATION ON THAT POTENTIAL CHARGE? POTENTIAL CHARGE?>>CERTAINLY HIS CHARGE IN>>CERTAINLY HIS CHARGE IN GENERAL, TO INVESTIGATE FULLY GENERAL, TO INVESTIGATE FULLY AND IF HE COULD COME TO AND IF HE COULD COME TO CONCLUSIONS — I DON’T KNOW WHY CONCLUSIONS — I DON’T KNOW WHY HE DIDN’T HERE. HE DIDN’T HERE. AND I DON’T KNOW WHAT AND I DON’T KNOW WHAT COMBINATION OF LAW AND FACT LED COMBINATION OF LAW AND FACT LED HIM TO THAT. HIM TO THAT. WHICH IS WHY I’M GOING TO WAIT WHICH IS WHY I’M GOING TO WAIT AND HEAR THE EXPLANATION, WHICH AND HEAR THE EXPLANATION, WHICH I HOPE WILL COME. I HOPE WILL COME.>>ON THE ISSUE OF WHETHER YOU>>ON THE ISSUE OF WHETHER YOU NEED AN UNDERLYING CRIME TO NEED AN UNDERLYING CRIME TO PROVE OBSTRUCTION — PROVE OBSTRUCTION –>>IS THAT A LEGAL PRINCIPLE>>IS THAT A LEGAL PRINCIPLE THAT YOU HAVE ALWAYS UNDERSTOOD? THAT YOU HAVE ALWAYS UNDERSTOOD?>>NO, THAT’S PART OF MY>>NO, THAT’S PART OF MY CONFUSION. CONFUSION. I DON’T THINK THE A.G. SAID THAT I DON’T THINK THE A.G. SAID THAT WAS THE JUSTIFICATION. WAS THE JUSTIFICATION. HE CITED IT AS A FACTOR. HE CITED IT AS A FACTOR. AND THAT’S JUST NOT BEEN MY AND THAT’S JUST NOT BEEN MY EXPERIENCE AS A PROSECUTOR FOR EXPERIENCE AS A PROSECUTOR FOR DECADES. DECADES. EVERY DAY IN THIS COUNTRY PEOPLE EVERY DAY IN THIS COUNTRY PEOPLE ARE PROSECUTED FOR OBSTRUCTING ARE PROSECUTED FOR OBSTRUCTING JUSTICE, TO AVOID EMBARRASSMENT, JUSTICE, TO AVOID EMBARRASSMENT, TO AVOID HARM TO THEIR BUSINESS, TO AVOID HARM TO THEIR BUSINESS, TO AVOID THREATS TO THEIR TO AVOID THREATS TO THEIR FAMILIES, WHERE THERE ISN’T AN FAMILIES, WHERE THERE ISN’T AN UNDERLYING CRIME THAT THEY UNDERLYING CRIME THAT THEY COMMITTED. COMMITTED. YOU WOULDN’T WANT IT ANY OTHER YOU WOULDN’T WANT IT ANY OTHER WAY, BECAUSE IF YOU ALWAYS HAD WAY, BECAUSE IF YOU ALWAYS HAD TO PROVE THE UNDERLYING CRIME, TO PROVE THE UNDERLYING CRIME, YOU WOULD CREATE INCENTIVES TO YOU WOULD CREATE INCENTIVES TO OBSTRUCT, BECAUSE PEOPLE GET OBSTRUCT, BECAUSE PEOPLE GET AWAY WITH BOTH IF THEY AWAY WITH BOTH IF THEY SUCCESSFULLY STOP AN SUCCESSFULLY STOP AN INVESTIGATION. INVESTIGATION.>>YOU WANT THIS WHOLE THING>>YOU WANT THIS WHOLE THING OUT? OUT?>>OH, IT HAS TO.>>OH, IT HAS TO. THE BEDROCK OF THE DEPARTMENT OF THE BEDROCK OF THE DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, WHICH BILL BARR LOVES JUSTICE, WHICH BILL BARR LOVES AND BOB MUELLER LOVES AND I AND BOB MUELLER LOVES AND I LOVE, THAT PEOPLE HAVE FAITH IN LOVE, THAT PEOPLE HAVE FAITH IN CONFIDENCE THAT IT’S NOT PART OF CONFIDENCE THAT IT’S NOT PART OF A POLITICAL TRIBE. A POLITICAL TRIBE. THE ONLY WAY TO ESTABLISH THAT THE ONLY WAY TO ESTABLISH THAT AND TO PROTECT THAT BEDROCK OF AND TO PROTECT THAT BEDROCK OF THEIR CONFIDENCE IS TO SHOW THEM THEIR CONFIDENCE IS TO SHOW THEM YOUR WORK. YOUR WORK. SO WE HAVE TO SEE IT HERE. SO WE HAVE TO SEE IT HERE.>>DO YOU ASK YOURSELF WHY>>DO YOU ASK YOURSELF WHY MUELLER DID NOT SUBPOENA MUELLER DID NOT SUBPOENA PRESIDENT TRUMP? PRESIDENT TRUMP? TO TRY TO GET TO THE HEART OF TO TRY TO GET TO THE HEART OF THIS INTENT QUESTION ON THIS INTENT QUESTION ON OBSTRUCTION? OBSTRUCTION?>>YES, I DO.>>YES, I DO. AND I DON’T KNOW THE ANSWER TO AND I DON’T KNOW THE ANSWER TO THAT. THAT. I HAVE THE SAME QUESTION ABOUT I HAVE THE SAME QUESTION ABOUT HOW THE ATTORNEY GENERAL COULD HOW THE ATTORNEY GENERAL COULD RESOLVE THE QUESTION, WHICH HE RESOLVE THE QUESTION, WHICH HE SAYS IN HIS LETTER TURNS UPON SAYS IN HIS LETTER TURNS UPON THE PRESIDENT’S INTENT, WITHOUT THE PRESIDENT’S INTENT, WITHOUT THE PRESIDENT HAVING BEEN ASKED THE PRESIDENT HAVING BEEN ASKED WHAT HIS INTENT IS. WHAT HIS INTENT IS.>>THEN THERE WAS YOUR FIRING.>>THEN THERE WAS YOUR FIRING. MAY 3rd, 2017. MAY 3rd, 2017. YOU GO BEFORE THE SENATE YOU GO BEFORE THE SENATE JUDICIARY COMMITTEE, YOU TALK JUDICIARY COMMITTEE, YOU TALK ABOUT A LOT OF THINGS, THE ABOUT A LOT OF THINGS, THE CLINTON E-MAIL SERVER. CLINTON E-MAIL SERVER. YOU 39 TO ANSWER QUESTIONS YOU 39 TO ANSWER QUESTIONS SPECIFICALLY ABOUT EVIDENCE OF SPECIFICALLY ABOUT EVIDENCE OF COLLUSION AT THAT POINT. COLLUSION AT THAT POINT. A COUPLE OF DAYS LATER, YOU’RE A COUPLE OF DAYS LATER, YOU’RE FIRED. FIRED. A FEW DAYS AFTER THAT I SIT DOWN A FEW DAYS AFTER THAT I SIT DOWN WITH PRESIDENT TRUMP — WITH PRESIDENT TRUMP –>>IN FACT, WHEN I DECIDED TO>>IN FACT, WHEN I DECIDED TO JUST DO IT I SAID TO MYSELF, I JUST DO IT I SAID TO MYSELF, I SAID, YOU KNOW, THIS RUSSIA SAID, YOU KNOW, THIS RUSSIA THING WITH TRUMP AND RUSSIA IS A THING WITH TRUMP AND RUSSIA IS A MADE-UP STORY. MADE-UP STORY.>>WHAT DID YOU THINK WHEN YOU>>WHAT DID YOU THINK WHEN YOU HEARD THAT? HEARD THAT?>>I THOUGHT THAT’S POTENTIALLY>>I THOUGHT THAT’S POTENTIALLY OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE. OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE. AND I HOPE SOMEBODY IS GOING TO AND I HOPE SOMEBODY IS GOING TO LOOK AT THAT. LOOK AT THAT. AGAIN, THE PRESIDENT APPEARS TO AGAIN, THE PRESIDENT APPEARS TO BE SAYING — I DON’T KNOW WHAT’S BE SAYING — I DON’T KNOW WHAT’S IN HIS HEAD, WHICH IS WHY I IN HIS HEAD, WHICH IS WHY I CAN’T REACH THE CONCLUSION — CAN’T REACH THE CONCLUSION — WHAT HE APPEARS TO BE SAYING IS, WHAT HE APPEARS TO BE SAYING IS, I GOT RID OF THIS GUY TO SHUT I GOT RID OF THIS GUY TO SHUT DOWN AN INVESTIGATION THAT DOWN AN INVESTIGATION THAT THREATENED ME. THREATENED ME.>>UP UNTIL THAT POINT YOU HAD>>UP UNTIL THAT POINT YOU HAD BEEN FIRED, WAS IT POSSIBLE THAT BEEN FIRED, WAS IT POSSIBLE THAT HE HAD FIRED YOU SIMPLY FOR THE HE HAD FIRED YOU SIMPLY FOR THE REASONS STATED IN THE INITIAL REASONS STATED IN THE INITIAL LETTER, THAT IT WAS YOUR LETTER, THAT IT WAS YOUR HANDLING OF THE CLINTON AFFAIR HANDLING OF THE CLINTON AFFAIR AND NOTHING MORE, NOTHING LESS? AND NOTHING MORE, NOTHING LESS?>>ANYTHING’S POSSIBLE WITH THIS>>ANYTHING’S POSSIBLE WITH THIS PRESIDENT. PRESIDENT. IT’S POSSIBLE HE WAS LYING TO ME IT’S POSSIBLE HE WAS LYING TO ME WHEN HE TOLD ME EARLIER IN THE WHEN HE TOLD ME EARLIER IN THE YEAR HOW WELL I HAD HANDLED THE YEAR HOW WELL I HAD HANDLED THE CLINTON THING. CLINTON THING. AND THAT I HAD TAKEN A BEATING AND THAT I HAD TAKEN A BEATING BUT BEHAVED HONORABLY. BUT BEHAVED HONORABLY. MAYBE THAT WAS A LIE AND HE MAYBE THAT WAS A LIE AND HE REALLY HAD HARBORED CONCERN REALLY HAD HARBORED CONCERN ABOUT MY VIOLATING DEPARTMENT OF ABOUT MY VIOLATING DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE NORMS OR SOMETHING. JUSTICE NORMS OR SOMETHING. DOESN’T SEEM LIKE MY TO ME. DOESN’T SEEM LIKE MY TO ME. THEN OBVIOUSLY HIS INTERVIEW THEN OBVIOUSLY HIS INTERVIEW WITH YOU KIND OF PUT THAT TO WITH YOU KIND OF PUT THAT TO REST. REST.>>BUT HE SAID THE RUSSIA THING,>>BUT HE SAID THE RUSSIA THING, YOU THOUGHT IT WAS BECAUSE OF YOU THOUGHT IT WAS BECAUSE OF RUSSIA? RUSSIA?>>BECAUSE HE SAID SO, YEAH.>>BECAUSE HE SAID SO, YEAH. SO I DID, YES. SO I DID, YES.>>THAT, IN YOUR MIND, WOULD>>THAT, IN YOUR MIND, WOULD HAVE BEEN OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE HAVE BEEN OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE NO, POTENTIALLY OBSTRUCTION OF NO, POTENTIALLY OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE. JUSTICE. IT’S COMPLICATED WHEN IT’S THE IT’S COMPLICATED WHEN IT’S THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES, PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES, GIVEN HIS AUTHORITY OVER THE GIVEN HIS AUTHORITY OVER THE EXECUTIVE BRANCH. EXECUTIVE BRANCH. BUT YOU WOULD CERTAINLY BE BUT YOU WOULD CERTAINLY BE IRRESPONSIBLE NOT TO EXPLORE IRRESPONSIBLE NOT TO EXPLORE WHETHER THAT IS OBSTRUCTION OF WHETHER THAT IS OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE. JUSTICE.>>WHAT THEY DID, IT WAS A FALSE>>WHAT THEY DID, IT WAS A FALSE NARRATIVE, IT WAS A TERRIBLE NARRATIVE, IT WAS A TERRIBLE THING. THING. WE CAN NEVER LET THIS HAPPEN TO WE CAN NEVER LET THIS HAPPEN TO ANOTHER PRESIDENT AGAIN. ANOTHER PRESIDENT AGAIN.>>THE PRESIDENT SAYS THIS>>THE PRESIDENT SAYS THIS SHOULD NEVER, EVER AGAIN HAPPEN SHOULD NEVER, EVER AGAIN HAPPEN TO AN AMERICAN PRESIDENT. TO AN AMERICAN PRESIDENT. WHAT DO YOU THINK ABOUT THAT? WHAT DO YOU THINK ABOUT THAT?>>CLOSE YOUR EYES.>>CLOSE YOUR EYES. AGAIN, CHANGE THE NAMES. AGAIN, CHANGE THE NAMES. LET ME MAKE ONE UP FOR YOU. LET ME MAKE ONE UP FOR YOU. THE IRANIANS. THE IRANIANS. THIS IS TOTALLY MADE UP. THIS IS TOTALLY MADE UP. THE IRANIANS INTERFERE IN THE THE IRANIANS INTERFERE IN THE ELECTION TO HELP ELECT BARACK ELECTION TO HELP ELECT BARACK OBAMA BECAUSE THEY THINK THEY’LL OBAMA BECAUSE THEY THINK THEY’LL GET A BETTER NUCLEAR DEAL FROM GET A BETTER NUCLEAR DEAL FROM HIM. HIM. AND DURING THAT ELECTION AN AND DURING THAT ELECTION AN OBAMA AIDE MEETS WITH THE OBAMA AIDE MEETS WITH THE IRANIANS AND TALKS ABOUT THE IRANIANS AND TALKS ABOUT THE DIRT THEY HAVE THAT WILL HELP DIRT THEY HAVE THAT WILL HELP OBAMA GET ELECTED. OBAMA GET ELECTED. AND THE FBI FINDS OUT ABOUT AND THE FBI FINDS OUT ABOUT THAT. THAT. WE SHOULD NOT INVESTIGATE THAT? WE SHOULD NOT INVESTIGATE THAT? AND THEN PRESIDENT OBAMA’S AND THEN PRESIDENT OBAMA’S NATIONAL SECURITY ADVISER LIES NATIONAL SECURITY ADVISER LIES TO THE FBI ABOUT HIS CONTACTS TO THE FBI ABOUT HIS CONTACTS WITH IS IRANIANS, AND THEN THE WITH IS IRANIANS, AND THEN THE PRESIDENT, OBAMA, ASKS ME TO PRESIDENT, OBAMA, ASKS ME TO DROP AN INVESTIGATION OF THAT DROP AN INVESTIGATION OF THAT AND THEN FIRES ME AND SAYS, I AND THEN FIRES ME AND SAYS, I WAS THINKING OF THE IRANIAN WAS THINKING OF THE IRANIAN THEN. THEN. THING HE INVITES THE MULLAHS TO THING HE INVITES THE MULLAHS TO THE OVAL OFFICE AND TELLS THEM, THE OVAL OFFICE AND TELLS THEM, THAT FBI DIRECTOR WAS A REAL THAT FBI DIRECTOR WAS A REAL NUTJOB, I LIFTED A LOT OF NUTJOB, I LIFTED A LOT OF PRESSURE BY FIRING HIM. PRESSURE BY FIRING HIM. WHO ON EARTH DOESN’T THINK THE WHO ON EARTH DOESN’T THINK THE FBI SHOULD INVESTIGATE THAT IN FBI SHOULD INVESTIGATE THAT IN THE HYPOCRISY IS REVEALED JUST THE HYPOCRISY IS REVEALED JUST BY CHANGING THE NAMES. BY CHANGING THE NAMES. THE FBI DID WHAT IT ABSOLUTELY THE FBI DID WHAT IT ABSOLUTELY HAD TO DO. HAD TO DO. THE AMERICAN PEOPLE SHOULD BE THE AMERICAN PEOPLE SHOULD BE GLAD IT’S THERE AND PROUD OF IT GLAD IT’S THERE AND PROUD OF IT AND THE REST IS JUST LYING AND AND THE REST IS JUST LYING AND NOISE. NOISE.>>Reporter: AND ABOUT CALLS>>Reporter: AND ABOUT CALLS FROM PROMINENT REPUBLICANS TO FROM PROMINENT REPUBLICANS TO OPEN UP AN INVESTIGATION INTO OPEN UP AN INVESTIGATION INTO THE FBI AND JUSTICE DEPARTMENT’S THE FBI AND JUSTICE DEPARTMENT’S ROLES IN STARTING THE COLLUSION ROLES IN STARTING THE COLLUSION INVESTIGATION — INVESTIGATION –>>LOOK, IT WOULD BE LIKE GOING>>LOOK, IT WOULD BE LIKE GOING TO THE DENTIST. TO THE DENTIST. I DON’T LOVE GOING TO THE I DON’T LOVE GOING TO THE DENTIST BUT I BELIEVE IN GOING DENTIST BUT I BELIEVE IN GOING TO THE DENTIST. TO THE DENTIST. SO IF THERE ARE QUESTIONS THAT SO IF THERE ARE QUESTIONS THAT HAVEN’T BEEN ANSWERED IN THE HAVEN’T BEEN ANSWERED IN THE HOURS AND HOURS AND HOURS OF HOURS AND HOURS AND HOURS OF TESTIMONY I’VE GIVEN, OF COURSE TESTIMONY I’VE GIVEN, OF COURSE I’LL ANSWER THEM. I’LL ANSWER THEM. I WANT IT ALL DONE IN THE LIGHT I WANT IT ALL DONE IN THE LIGHT OF DAY, THOUGH. OF DAY, THOUGH. NO MORE SECRET DEPOSITIONS. NO MORE SECRET DEPOSITIONS. PUBLIC HEARINGS SERVE THE PUBLIC PUBLIC HEARINGS SERVE THE PUBLIC INTEREST. INTEREST. SO IF THERE ARE QUESTIONS TO BE

Author:

100 thoughts on “NBC News Exclusive: Comey Gives First Interview Since Mueller Completed Report | NBC Nightly News”

  • Da Nang Dick Blumenthal says:

    Comey biggest crime was exonerating crooked Hillary of illegal server 2 days after Doj lynch met with Bill Clinton on tarmac. It's not fbi job to exonerate crooked Hillary, it's Doj job. Obviously it was rigged. She should have been indicted during campaign. Comey and lynch let her skate. That is now being investigated. I bet everyone including obozo will end up in jail.

  • I find the double standard of the GOP forcing Comey to reveal all about the Hillary investigation but then wanting to hide as much as possible about Trump. Imagine if Comey was head of the FBI and had not been fired. He might have come to the same sorts of conclusions that Meuller did, but his sense of fair play would have forced him to hold a press conference and describe exactly what Trump did and that it may not rise to a level of indictment, his actions have seriously undermined the people’s trust in the President, and that Trump showed terrible judgment and was ethically wrong in so many ways. Imagine the shoe of Comey’s Hillary comments on the Trump foot! It would be devastating.

    Honestly, what the GOP is teaching Dems is that honesty and integrity are not winning political strategies.

  • To me the key point in the interview comes at 08:11. Comey gave the best rebuttal to those who think the investigation was a farce and hoax. He gave a simple example by just changing names: (Quoting) The Iranians interfere in the election to help elect Barack Obama because they think they'd get a better nuclear deal from him, and during that election an Obama aide meets with the Iranians and talks about the dirt they have that would help Obama get elected, and the FBI finds out about that. We should not investigate that? And then president Obama's national security advisor LIES to the FBI about his contacts with the Iranians, and then the president, Obama, asks me to drop an investigation of that, and then fires me and says “I was thinking of the Iranian thing”, and then he invites the mullahs to the Oval office and tells them “that FBI director is a real nut job, I lifted a lot of pressure by firing him.” Who on earth doesn't think the FBI shouldn't investigate that? So, the hypocrisy is revealed just by changing the names. The FBI did what it absolutely had to do. The American people should be glad it's there and proud of it, and the rest is just lying and noise.

  • Here's the guy that destroyed the country. No FBI director comes out before the election, to say we are investigating a candidate. THE DAY AMERICA DIED.

  • Rose Donaldson says:

    Comey is a lier and a cheat. If he wants transparency way didn't we get that with crocked Hilary. He's not about trurh.

  • Austin Giguere says:

    James Comey is a true American disgrace he will go down in history as one of the worst FBI directors ever. He is a political hack who surrounded himself with far left liberals like Andy McCabe Lisa Page and Peter strozyk. He has two more to ruin the reputation of the FBI than any other director.

  • Austin Giguere says:

    I promise you you will never see Robert Mueller or any other former head of the FBI out selling books attacking a sitting president. James Comey is a political hack disgrace who almost single-handedly destroyed the FBI's reputation.

  • again, trump and his cronies try to stop everyone from finding out the truth. if he really feels exonerated, show the full report. why are they scared to show it all. And, asking adam schiff to resign for wanting to find out the truth either russia collusion or obstruction? Why? If there's nothing to hide, then show it all for the public to know! Heck, even the world want to know what's really going on!

  • comy has a split personality on one hand he remembers every thing he is asked in this interview but in front of congress he cant remember 300 times not real convincing and the interviewer did he not get the memo no collusion no obstruction and the ag cant release the report fully without a judges permission its against the law i guess if u were a bias tart u would just leak cannot anyone see the oldest trick in the book here (divide and conquer)

  • artocin gerbub says:

    Haha notice that he is not a happy man, not like when he went round promoting his book n had just leaked his memos to the Press. Cannot wait till he gets indicted!

  • That Iranian analogy is simple and quite persuasive. It exposes how ridiculous the GOP position is in their attempts to protect Trump from his treasonous escapades. Blind loyalty is an empire killer. Hopefully, there are enough non-partisans to save America from the current corrupt strangle.

  • George Thompson says:

    two traitors kissing each others arses,..a globalist commie reporter interviewing a corrupt fbi stooge ?……priceless !

  • What a pathetic attempt at trying to save face…Get over it already Comey, you were fired and now its sour grapes. The good new is, the FBI leadership have been proven to have a left bias, so much for truth and fairness…

  • Goldgem1 InfinityX says:

    The fact that Mueller did not find enough evidence to charge the President does not, necessarily, mean there wasn't. Even the Russians conceded in their ecstatic reaction to the Barr Summary that Mueller was "..searching for a 'black cat in a dark room'.." After all, the cat could still be in there but not seen in the dark. If only Mueller had interviewed Trump directly, we might be seeing a different Summary or at least, the credibility of the Barr Summary would not be this close to acceptable.

    Meanwhile, what folks have to worry about is what might have constituted the 'darkness in the room'. I deem that to be the concerted and coordinated efforts by Trump and his GOP cohorts to attack Mueller, the idiotic calls of theirs for Mueller to abrogate the Investigations in midstream, the mendacious claim by those folks that Mueller was working for the Democrats, and the fact that certain entities who ought to have been interviewed by Mueller, like Trump Jr., were left out. I wonder how that obvious release of Trump Jr., for instance, from the dragnet of the Investigations spells out Justice for others who were indicted and jailed. Is it because Trump Jr. was the President's son, and that Trump, even as much he smeared himself with so much stinky lies and obstruction of Justice behavior, still was given a pass that he had to share with his son?

    If it had been Obama and the Democrats that had done even a tenth of what has been already found and charged against Trump's associates, the Republicans might demand for the former President to be jailed outright, and deported to Kenya thereafter. This is the greatest hypocrisy in America's governance History, and it is perpetrated by the Republicans, who until now, had been claiming a superior moral and patriotic allegiance to America. Shame unto them! Or, should I say, they don't deserve to rule America ever, again, especially, because they have been infected with Trump's resistant anti-shame syndrome.

  • Just like when Trump claimed he wanted to sit with Mueller….. Trump claims he has nothing to hide…. Has great trust in Barr…. hmmm

  • The government terms you can obstruct justice on a none crime Haha trump was telling people to lie and firing people because of the Russia investigation when trump or no one around trump was doing anything with Russia haha

  • Comey really? The disgraced FBI director? Hillary would have fired him too but just because Trump did it Comey's a hero.

  • 02 April 2019 Tuesday PM : YouTube : Hillary Clinton : James Comey : Today : start at 2:00 minutes thru 8:00 minutes : https://youtu.be/KoAKIdFJftw

    When ever did the FBI’s Robert S. Mueller III and/or Chief Intelligence Officer James B. Comey Jr., investigate or prosecute a single person or entity in the failed “Subprime Mortgage Crisis” aka “The Great Recession” that occurred during 2007 thru 2009? Nor thereafter investigated any financial crimes amounting to trillions $,$$$,$$$,$$$,$$$ of dollars and millions of properties lost, all belonging to The People of these United States; the people whom they supposedly serve/d? Mueller was at the helm of law enforcement on 11 September 2001 when two high-rise buildings/World Trade Centers collapsed, one commercial airplane crashed in Pennsylvania and a portion of the U. S. Pentagon was destroyed; around ~ 3,000 citizens murdered in a few hours. Why is this guy Mueller still working, or even employable anywhere, let alone in our own Government currently being paid with our tax dollars? He should have been fired then in 2001, along with about ~ 300 of his direct subordinates. Why is Comey still breathing, let alone writing a book, when he should have been hung for treason (along with James R. Clapper Jr. of CIA for lying to Congress / people of United States) for interfering in the 2016 electoral process (probably the deciding factor that caused Hillary Clinton to loose : why were there no “FBI” press releases of the potential Trump Russia collusion investigation before Election Day in November?) …. and prior to that allowing illegal, unconstitutional wiretapping/ surveillance on millions upon millions of United States Citizens?? Scam, scam, scam : United Scams of America : decade after decade after decade : on and on and on : No accountability N/EVER from the top down; always from the bottom up, the lowest of the low, poorest of the poor : More distracting ‘watch the birdie’ pingpong politics by self serving reptilian Government career tax leeches and ‘unofficial’ Government press : The Wolves of Washington D. C. : SCAMS Across America : Scams Across the Land I love : United We fall, United We SCAM, Scams Across America <— Sung too the tune Hands Across America

  • Here comes the Sun! says:

    Hey Jim, you went rouge and tried to undermine a sitting President all because you didn’t deem him worthy of the Washington establishment. You disgraced the FBI and yourself. Get off of TV bro, it just makes it worse.

  • Ann van de Kew says:

    Today we found out the real reason why Trump attacks former British spy Christopher Steele. It’s because he’s been investigating Trump Tower since 2011. His probes led to 44 Russia-linked indictments. 30 of them were Russian mobsters indicted for laundering money in Trump Tower.

  • WaterEarth Mud says:

    2:22-everything i learned about hillary was from united states free television, are u saying the medias work for russia!?

  • WaterEarth Mud says:

    6:16-just like u "didnt find any classified documents, hillary sent over her private server. when judicial watch has found over 100 of them thru freedom of information act

  • WaterEarth Mud says:

    7:06-and that special investigation didnt net any AMERICAN for colluding with russia.. lying about tax and foreign contacts in ukraine, but not russia..
    ukraine is an allie of the united states, russia is more of a twice removed cousin

  • WaterEarth Mud says:

    7:34-he asked some people what they thought of u and upon their combined sustain of u trump fired u!!!
    even the asst ag didnt give u a favorable review

  • WaterEarth Mud says:

    9:06-obamas fbi cause u turnd a blind eye to that and uraniumOne..
    dude u r a complete liar. all ur speculation and conjecture have been proven wrong time and time again!!

  • o-ptimus prime says:

    Trump averages 8 lies a day while come is accused of lying once lol
    who do you believe?
    Comey is a man of integrity
    trump is a proven liar

  • Agnes Connell says:

    The American law enforcement is now a force not to trust and will it be in the report who exactly started all this with the dossier and who paid for this and also I thought the democrats wanted Comey fired for looking into the Clinton's

  • SCOTT MATTHEW ** FIFTH POWER PRODUCTIONS says:

    If the F.B.I. really want's to uncover the TRUTH why doesn't it admit it HAS ALL of the 9/11 black boxes…………….The boxes vanished just like the planes. No one cares anymore.

  • Trump (actually Drumpf – even his surname is fake) is continuing in his as-yet-undaunted march to becoming the new Joseph McCarthy; what we need but still haven't gotten is his political and media nemesis. Where is this era's Joseph N. Welsh to reveal that latter-day charlatan, that Presidential impostor, that orange-faced pretender to the throne to the national and global public; to finally and permanently declare that this would-be emperor has no moralistic, ethical or patriotic clothes, and is as idealistically naked as a literally bald eagle plucked of all its feathers?

  • Jim Comey you were dead wrong,   when you promped a special counsel……..  Trump did America a favor when he fired you…and fired you for incompetence unbecoming of a FBI director……you don't know the answers to a lot of questions an FBI director should …..

  • Debajyoti Bose says:

    Of course Trump colluded, like the Obama and Iran reference Comey, the problem is the Russians cleaned up good, FBI got nothing.

  • fairy princess or something whatever says:

    The joker who tolds us it's ok to destroy phones and computers!!! Is but hurt for being fired!!

  • Comey is so fake. He was part of the deep State and he was wrong for announcing HC investigation. Trump was right to fire him regardless of the reason.

  • So really who knows and its all pure speculation.All i got to say is ,is that the government is totally screwed from top to bottom.I guess people love the drama.And i agree with Comey,let it all hang out with what people think and their opinions.But it wont amount to crimes because there were no indictments by Mueller.And that folks is enough said.Now lets do something for the country and start working on people who need the government to work for the average citizen.

  • Oh my my my! The twist and turns Comey makes, are comparable to an contortion artist. Cannot wait for him to once again be put under oath and watch him squirm. They already know he lied before and are hopeful he will continue to do so. I he will be indicted. Sleaze!

  • That would never have happened with President Obama, EVER!!! Corruption at the highest level, Obama would've been charged, tried, and convicted

  • Yea yet he found that he could not hold Hillary accountable after laying out all the evidence! Do they forget everything thing get recorded that u can look it back up

  • Stephen James says:

    Why are republicans so terrified of people seeing the truth, if the truth is absolves them? The report was paid for by the public and the public want it. The AG has no right to hide it.

  • FBI and Law Enforcement Officers has been always keeping America safe and sets an example on the world stage how injustice and unethical conducts are intolerable. Neither Trump nor Obama did that. Peeeeeriiiooood!

  • If the FBI isn't corrupt, why was Clinton given immunity prior to her server being turned over…..further….why was she not charged with obstruction after bleachbitting her server and destroying devices and hard drives with hammers?

  • bassmaster1953 says:

    Lying Comey tells a good story. Yet, he forgot to mention he leaked a private conversation to initiate the Mueller investigation. Lying Comey is a scum bag spy.

  • The WOLF in the hen house. Public enemy #1-
    Comey is wanting to control information so he can say CLASSIFIED!.
     Light of day??? Public questions always get – This is classified I can't respond.
    Comey does not believe he was spying.
    Then why was a FISA required?
    It illegal to bug our friend's phones? SPYING
    That is what they did.

  • Sarah Sanders believes that the FBI are indeed a nest of vipers and spies, and said in an interview that Mr. Comey is a dirty cop. I'm wondering how he feels about that.

  • james comey is a CLOWN who led a COUP to OverThrow the 2016 election and will soon find himself and his political GANG locked away in GITMO!!….#TRUMP2020….if you never tried THINKING for yourselves before….there's NO better time than NOW!

  • Did YOU Know?
    The FIX was
    IN
    YEARS AGO!!
    James Comey
    represented Hillary in the 1978 Cattlegate case
    and was found (NOT GUILTY) of Insider Trading.
    That's the same James Comey
    who sent Martha Stewart to Prison
    for Insider Trading in October 2004.
    The Hilda-Beast Skipped jail time
    for SOooo Doing MUCH MORE.
    And Yes,
    The SAME FBI james comey who Changed
    ~TWO Words~
    to Help Hillary Clinton Avoid Prison
    Just a simple change in vocabulary
    from ༻"GROSSLY NEGLIGENT"༺
    to ༻"Extremely Careless"༺
    So INSTEAD of sitting in Leaven worth Prison,
     the Demon-RAT Embodied in human Flesh
     Ran for the Highest office in OUR land _
    (((REVOLTING)))

  • ?How on earth could we not check into thedonald? how on earth could comey and friends ignore/ dismiss the other half of the invest. there's a reason comey say's we "have to, have to, have to" win in 2020. Next, we'll hear, "all this is no big deal, cant we all just get along. Está bien James, todos ya lo saben.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *