John Kerry reacts to Trump accusing him of violating Logan Act

John Kerry reacts to Trump accusing him of violating Logan Act


THAT AND REALLY STAYED ON
MESSAGE IN A VERY FORCEFUL WAY. MESSAGE IN A VERY FORCEFUL WAY.
I THOUGHT IT WAS HIS BEST I THOUGHT IT WAS HIS BEST
DEBATE, IT CAME AT A TIME THAT DEBATE, IT CAME AT A TIME THAT
WAS OBVIOUSLY HELPFUL AND GOOD WAS OBVIOUSLY HELPFUL AND GOOD
TO HIM, IMPORTANT GOING INTO TO HIM, IMPORTANT GOING INTO
NEVADA AND WHAT’S REALLY NEVADA AND WHAT’S REALLY
IMPORTANT TO LOOK AT IS THE IMPORTANT TO LOOK AT IS THE
LEADING CANDIDATE AT THAT MOMENT LEADING CANDIDATE AT THAT MOMENT
IS IN THE 20s, AND IF YOU HAVE IS IN THE 20s, AND IF YOU HAVE
FOUR PEOPLE DIVIDED BY THE VOTE FOUR PEOPLE DIVIDED BY THE VOTE
WITH A SORT OF SIMILAR POINT OF WITH A SORT OF SIMILAR POINT OF
VIEW, THAT DISTORTS WHAT THE VIEW, THAT DISTORTS WHAT THE
REALITY IS HERE. REALITY IS HERE.
THE NEXT FEW DAYS IN NEVADA AND THE NEXT FEW DAYS IN NEVADA AND
SOUTH CAROLINA ARE GOING TO HELP SOUTH CAROLINA ARE GOING TO HELP
WEEN THIS OUT A BIT, THAT WILL WEEN THIS OUT A BIT, THAT WILL
CHANGE THE DYNAMIC OF THIS RACE. CHANGE THE DYNAMIC OF THIS RACE.
>>Ed: YOU SAY IN THE 20s>>Ed: YOU SAY IN THE 20s
BUT BERNIE SANDERS AND SOME BUT BERNIE SANDERS AND SOME
NATIONAL POLLS IS REACHING INTO NATIONAL POLLS IS REACHING INTO
THE 30s AND POISE IN DEBATES THE 30s AND POISE IN DEBATES
LAST NIGHT, THERE WERE POINTS LAST NIGHT, THERE WERE POINTS
WHERE IT WAS MISSING IN ACTION WHERE IT WAS MISSING IN ACTION
ON ISSUES LIKE HEALTH CARE, TOOK ON ISSUES LIKE HEALTH CARE, TOOK
A LONG TIME BEFORE EVEN HE GOT A LONG TIME BEFORE EVEN HE GOT
IN THERE. IN THERE.
THE QUESTION IS HOW CAN HE THE QUESTION IS HOW CAN HE
CHANGE THIS DYNAMIC BECAUSE IT CHANGE THIS DYNAMIC BECAUSE IT
APPEARS RIGHT NOW THAT APPEARS RIGHT NOW THAT
BERNIE SANDERS OVER THE NEXT BERNIE SANDERS OVER THE NEXT
WEEK OR TWO COULD END UP HAVING WEEK OR TWO COULD END UP HAVING
A DELICATE BEE THAT IS GOING TO A DELICATE BEE THAT IS GOING TO
BE VERY HARD TO BEAT. BE VERY HARD TO BEAT.
>>I’M NOT GOING TO GET INTO THE>>I’M NOT GOING TO GET INTO THE
PREDICTIONS, THE PERSONAL PREDICTIONS, THE PERSONAL
EXPERIENCE IS OFTEN VERY WRONG EXPERIENCE IS OFTEN VERY WRONG
IN THESE THINGS AND MY JUDGMENT IN THESE THINGS AND MY JUDGMENT
IS JOE BIDEN, HOW MANY TIMES, IS JOE BIDEN, HOW MANY TIMES,
HOW MANY DEBATES HAVE WE SPENT HOW MANY DEBATES HAVE WE SPENT
MOST OF THE DEBATE ON MOST OF THE DEBATE ON
HEALTH CARE AND THE DISTINCTION HEALTH CARE AND THE DISTINCTION
BETWEEN JOE BIDEN AND THE OTHERS BETWEEN JOE BIDEN AND THE OTHERS
AS HE DOESN’T WANT TO KICK AS HE DOESN’T WANT TO KICK
150 MILLION AMERICANS OFF OF 150 MILLION AMERICANS OFF OF
THEIR HEALTH CARE. THEIR HEALTH CARE.
HE MADE THAT POINT LAST NIGHT HE MADE THAT POINT LAST NIGHT
BUT MORE IMPORTANTLY WHEN YOU BUT MORE IMPORTANTLY WHEN YOU
LOOK AT WHERE THE WORLD IS LOOK AT WHERE THE WORLD IS
TODAY, THE BIGGEST CHALLENGES WE TODAY, THE BIGGEST CHALLENGES WE
FACE AS A NATION ARE CHALLENGES FACE AS A NATION ARE CHALLENGES
THAT REQUIRE OUR PRESIDENT WHO THAT REQUIRE OUR PRESIDENT WHO
HAS RELATIONSHIPS WITH OTHER HAS RELATIONSHIPS WITH OTHER
COUNTRIES, WITH OTHER LEADERS COUNTRIES, WITH OTHER LEADERS
WHO KNOWS THAT PLAYING FIELD AND WHO KNOWS THAT PLAYING FIELD AND
HAS THE ABILITY TO BE ABLE TO HAS THE ABILITY TO BE ABLE TO
LEAD AMERICA, THE LEADER OF THE LEAD AMERICA, THE LEADER OF THE
FREE WORLD ONCE AGAIN WE HOPE, FREE WORLD ONCE AGAIN WE HOPE,
AND I THINK JOE BIDEN IS THE AND I THINK JOE BIDEN IS THE
ONLY ONE WHO COMES BACK TO THE ONLY ONE WHO COMES BACK TO THE
TABLE WITH THOSE RELATIONSHIPS TABLE WITH THOSE RELATIONSHIPS
WITH THAT EXPERIENCE, WITH THE WITH THAT EXPERIENCE, WITH THE
ABILITY TO DEAL WITH CYBER ABILITY TO DEAL WITH CYBER
WARFARE, NUCLEAR WEAPONS WHICH WARFARE, NUCLEAR WEAPONS WHICH
ARE NOW BACK ON THE TABLE WITH ARE NOW BACK ON THE TABLE WITH
THE QUESTION OF EXTREMISM, THE THE QUESTION OF EXTREMISM, THE
FIGHT THAT WE WAGED ORIGINALLY FIGHT THAT WE WAGED ORIGINALLY
AGAINST ISIS, THAT WAS A AGAINST ISIS, THAT WAS A
STRATEGY THAT OBAMA-BIDEN STRATEGY THAT OBAMA-BIDEN
ADMINISTRATION AND ALL OF US ADMINISTRATION AND ALL OF US
WORKED ON. WORKED ON.
THAT’S WHAT MAKES AMERICA SAFE. THAT’S WHAT MAKES AMERICA SAFE.
OF>>Ed: I HEAR YOU, BUT NO OF>>Ed: I HEAR YOU, BUT NO
FOREIGN POLICY QUESTIONS AT ALL, FOREIGN POLICY QUESTIONS AT ALL,
I COULD BE THE MODERATOR’S I COULD BE THE MODERATOR’S
FAULT. FAULT.
I WOULD LIKE TO ASK YOU, IN THIS I WOULD LIKE TO ASK YOU, IN THIS
DEBATE YOU WERE TALKING ABOUT DEBATE YOU WERE TALKING ABOUT
COMES AT A TIME WHEN COMES AT A TIME WHEN
PRESIDENT TRUMP IS ACCUSING NOT PRESIDENT TRUMP IS ACCUSING NOT
JUST YOU, BUT JUST YOU, BUT
SENATOR CHRIS MURPHY NOW FOR SENATOR CHRIS MURPHY NOW FOR
VIOLATING THE LOGAN ACT OF VIOLATING THE LOGAN ACT OF
NEGOTIATING WITH FOREIGN NEGOTIATING WITH FOREIGN
GOVERNMENTS WITH IRAN. GOVERNMENTS WITH IRAN.
>>THAT IS ONCE AGAIN ANOTHER>>THAT IS ONCE AGAIN ANOTHER
PRESIDENTIAL LIFE, A COMPLETE PRESIDENTIAL LIFE, A COMPLETE
EFFORT BY THE PRESIDENT TO EFFORT BY THE PRESIDENT TO
DISTORT REALITY, BECAUSE HE DISTORT REALITY, BECAUSE HE
WOULD KNOW I DIDN’T NEGOTIATE WOULD KNOW I DIDN’T NEGOTIATE
WITH ANYBODY. WITH ANYBODY.
I DID WHAT ANY SENATOR AND I DID WHAT ANY SENATOR AND
SECRETARIES OF STATE IN HISTORY SECRETARIES OF STATE IN HISTORY
HAVE DONE WHICH IS CONTINUING TO HAVE DONE WHICH IS CONTINUING TO
GO TO CONFERENCES ABROAD IN GO TO CONFERENCES ABROAD IN
ORDER TO BE WELL-INFORMED. ORDER TO BE WELL-INFORMED.
WHAT HE OUGHT TO DO IS FOCUS ON WHAT HE OUGHT TO DO IS FOCUS ON
SOMEBODY CALLED RUDY GIULIANI SOMEBODY CALLED RUDY GIULIANI
WHO HAS BEEN OUT THERE ENGAGED WHO HAS BEEN OUT THERE ENGAGED
IN VERY DIRECT NEGOTIATIONS IN IN VERY DIRECT NEGOTIATIONS IN
AN EFFORT TO TRY TO A SUBTERFUGE AN EFFORT TO TRY TO A SUBTERFUGE
FOREIGN POLICY SO LET’S GET REAL FOREIGN POLICY SO LET’S GET REAL
HERE. HERE.
>>Ed: ON THAT POINT, THE>>Ed: ON THAT POINT, THE
PRESIDENT SAYS RUDY GIULIANI AS PRESIDENT SAYS RUDY GIULIANI AS
HIS PERSONAL ATTORNEY, HE HAS HIS PERSONAL ATTORNEY, HE HAS
EVERY RIGHT TO SEE INFORMATION EVERY RIGHT TO SEE INFORMATION
THAT IS OUT THERE FOR HUNDRED THAT IS OUT THERE FOR HUNDRED
BIDEN, NUMBER ONE AND NUMBER BIDEN, NUMBER ONE AND NUMBER
TWO, THE PRESIDENT BELIEVES THAT TWO, THE PRESIDENT BELIEVES THAT
WE HAVE BEEN UNDERMINING HIS WE HAVE BEEN UNDERMINING HIS
FOREIGN POLICY. FOREIGN POLICY.
>>THE PERSONAL ATTORNEY OF THE>>THE PERSONAL ATTORNEY OF THE
PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES
SHOULD NOT BE MEETING WITH SHOULD NOT BE MEETING WITH
PEOPLE WHO HAVE NOW BEEN PEOPLE WHO HAVE NOW BEEN
INDICTED WHO HAVE BROKEN THE LAW INDICTED WHO HAVE BROKEN THE LAW
AND WHO ARE ENGAGED IN AND WHO ARE ENGAGED IN
ACTIVITIES WITH THE PRESIDENT’S ACTIVITIES WITH THE PRESIDENT’S
PERSONAL LAWYER. PERSONAL LAWYER.
WE HAVE TO BE REAL HERE. WE HAVE TO BE REAL HERE.
THAT IS ACTIVITY WAY BEYOND THAT IS ACTIVITY WAY BEYOND
ANYTHING I’VE EVER SEEN IN MY ANYTHING I’VE EVER SEEN IN MY
LIFE AND I THINK COMPLETELY AND LIFE AND I THINK COMPLETELY AND
TOTALLY INAPPROPRIATE. TOTALLY INAPPROPRIATE.
I MORE IMPORTANTLY I’M A LOOK AT I MORE IMPORTANTLY I’M A LOOK AT
THE POLICIES THAT UNDERLIE THIS. THE POLICIES THAT UNDERLIE THIS.
WE WENT TO THE BRINK OF WAR WITH WE WENT TO THE BRINK OF WAR WITH
IRAN, THE PRESIDENT FARMED OUT IRAN, THE PRESIDENT FARMED OUT
TO IRAN THE DECISION ABOUT TO IRAN THE DECISION ABOUT
WHETHER OR NOT WE WOULD BE AT WHETHER OR NOT WE WOULD BE AT
WAR BECAUSE THEY HAD RESPONDED WAR BECAUSE THEY HAD RESPONDED
IN A WAY THAT THEY MIGHT HAVE IN A WAY THAT THEY MIGHT HAVE
BEEN AT WAR IN THAT MOMENT. BEEN AT WAR IN THAT MOMENT.
>>Ed: YOU WHEN THE OTHER>>Ed: YOU WHEN THE OTHER
DEMOCRATS HAVE BEEN SAYING THAT DEMOCRATS HAVE BEEN SAYING THAT
FOR WEEKS NOW THAT WE WERE AT FOR WEEKS NOW THAT WE WERE AT
THE BRINK OF WAR AND IS GOING TO THE BRINK OF WAR AND IS GOING TO
GET US INTO WAR WITH IRAN AND IT GET US INTO WAR WITH IRAN AND IT
HASN’T HAPPENED AND INSTEAD IT HASN’T HAPPENED AND INSTEAD IT
APPEARS THAT IRAN HAS BEEN APPEARS THAT IRAN HAS BEEN
PUSHED BACK. PUSHED BACK.
>>IT DIDN’T HAPPEN BECAUSE I>>IT DIDN’T HAPPEN BECAUSE I
RAN HAPPENED NOT TO KILL AN RAN HAPPENED NOT TO KILL AN
AMERICAN WHEN THEY RESPONDED. AMERICAN WHEN THEY RESPONDED.
THEY HAD, WE WOULD’VE BEEN THAT THEY HAD, WE WOULD’VE BEEN THAT
WAR. WAR.
THAT MEANS THE DECISION OF THAT MEANS THE DECISION OF
WHETHER TO GO TO WAR WAS IN FACT WHETHER TO GO TO WAR WAS IN FACT
DEPENDENT ON THE RESPONSE OF A DEPENDENT ON THE RESPONSE OF A
COUNTRY THAT IS THE REGIME NONE COUNTRY THAT IS THE REGIME NONE
OF US LIKE. OF US LIKE.
THE QUESTION IS WHAT DO YOU DO THE QUESTION IS WHAT DO YOU DO
ABOUT THAT REGIME? ABOUT THAT REGIME?
HOW DO YOU RESPOND TO IT? HOW DO YOU RESPOND TO IT?
THE PRESIDENT HAS ISOLATED US THE PRESIDENT HAS ISOLATED US
FROM FRANCE, GERMANY, BRITAIN, FROM FRANCE, GERMANY, BRITAIN,
CHINA, RUSSIA, ALL OF WHOM NOT CHINA, RUSSIA, ALL OF WHOM NOT
ONLY SIGNED THE AGREEMENT BUT ONLY SIGNED THE AGREEMENT BUT
ARE TRYING TO KEEP IT ALIVE. ARE TRYING TO KEEP IT ALIVE.
SO THE PRESIDENT IS ON HIS OWN, SO THE PRESIDENT IS ON HIS OWN,
IF HE HAD GONE TO WAR, THE IF HE HAD GONE TO WAR, THE
UNITED NATIONS SECURITY COUNCIL UNITED NATIONS SECURITY COUNCIL
WOULD NOT HAVE BEEN WITH THE WOULD NOT HAVE BEEN WITH THE
UNITED STATES, OUR ALLIES WOULD UNITED STATES, OUR ALLIES WOULD
NOT HAVE BEEN WITH US, WE NOT HAVE BEEN WITH US, WE
WOULD’VE BEEN ON OUR OWN. WOULD’VE BEEN ON OUR OWN.
THAT IS NOT THE WAY TO PUT THAT IS NOT THE WAY TO PUT
AMERICAN SOLDIERS AT RISK. AMERICAN SOLDIERS AT RISK.
>>Ed: LET’S GET BACK TO THE>>Ed: LET’S GET BACK TO THE
DEBATE, I WANTED TO GO DOWN THAT DEBATE, I WANTED TO GO DOWN THAT
ROAD. ROAD.
LET ME PLAY A CLIP THAT PUTS LET ME PLAY A CLIP THAT PUTS
YOUR CANDIDATE IN A MOMENT WHERE YOUR CANDIDATE IN A MOMENT WHERE
JOE BIDEN SPOKE UP AND PUSHED JOE BIDEN SPOKE UP AND PUSHED
BACK AGAINST MICHAEL BLOOMBERG BACK AGAINST MICHAEL BLOOMBERG
ON THE ISSUE OF NDA’S AND WOMEN. ON THE ISSUE OF NDA’S AND WOMEN.
>>ARE YOU WILLING TO RELEASE>>ARE YOU WILLING TO RELEASE
ALL OF THOSE WOMEN FROM THOSE ALL OF THOSE WOMEN FROM THOSE
NONDISCLOSURE AGREEMENTS? NONDISCLOSURE AGREEMENTS?
>>ACCUSE ME OF DOING ANYTHING,>>ACCUSE ME OF DOING ANYTHING,
MAYBE DIDN’T LIKE THE JOKE I MAYBE DIDN’T LIKE THE JOKE I
TOLD. TOLD.
>>ALL YOU HAVE TO SAY IS YOU>>ALL YOU HAVE TO SAY IS YOU
ARE RELEASED FROM A ARE RELEASED FROM A
NONDISCLOSURE AGREEMENT. NONDISCLOSURE AGREEMENT.
MACK. MACK.
WE ARE NOT GOING TO END THESE WE ARE NOT GOING TO END THESE
AGREEMENTS BECAUSE THEY WERE AGREEMENTS BECAUSE THEY WERE
MADE CONSENSUALLY AND THEY HAVE MADE CONSENSUALLY AND THEY HAVE
EVERY RIGHT TO EXPECT THAT THEY EVERY RIGHT TO EXPECT THAT THEY
WILL STAY PRIVATE. WILL STAY PRIVATE.
>>Ed: YOU HEAR THE GROANS>>Ed: YOU HEAR THE GROANS
THEY ARE, YOUR CANDIDATE PUSHED THEY ARE, YOUR CANDIDATE PUSHED
BACK HARD ON THE ISSUE OF BACK HARD ON THE ISSUE OF
TRANSPARENCY, CAN THE DEMOCRATS TRANSPARENCY, CAN THE DEMOCRATS
NOMINATE SOMEONE LIKE NOMINATE SOMEONE LIKE
MICHAEL BLOOMBERG WHO WILL NOT MICHAEL BLOOMBERG WHO WILL NOT
RELEASE THESE NDA’S? RELEASE THESE NDA’S?
>>OBVIOUSLY, DEMOCRATS ACROSS>>OBVIOUSLY, DEMOCRATS ACROSS
THE COUNTRY COMING UP IN THE THE COUNTRY COMING UP IN THE
SUPER TUESDAY RACE WHICH IS THE SUPER TUESDAY RACE WHICH IS THE
FIRST TIME THAT PEOPLE WOULD FIRST TIME THAT PEOPLE WOULD
HAVE THAT CHOICE IN FRONT OF HAVE THAT CHOICE IN FRONT OF
THEM, THEY’RE GOING TO MAKE UP THEM, THEY’RE GOING TO MAKE UP
THEIR MINDS ON THAT SO IT SEEMS THEIR MINDS ON THAT SO IT SEEMS
TO ME THAT JOE BIDEN AND OTHERS TO ME THAT JOE BIDEN AND OTHERS
WERE CORRECT IN SAYING IT WAS WERE CORRECT IN SAYING IT WAS
IMPORTANT FOR PEOPLE TO BE ABLE IMPORTANT FOR PEOPLE TO BE ABLE
TO SPEAK OUT ON THE TRANSPARENCY TO SPEAK OUT ON THE TRANSPARENCY
AND ACCOUNTABILITY IS CRITICAL AND ACCOUNTABILITY IS CRITICAL
HERE. HERE.
I TAKE WITH THE REASON PEOPLE I TAKE WITH THE REASON PEOPLE
WERE GROANING AND BOOING IS THAT WERE GROANING AND BOOING IS THAT
MOST PEOPLE KNOW THERE IS NOT MOST PEOPLE KNOW THERE IS NOT
AND EVEN GROUND THAT YOU ARE ON AND EVEN GROUND THAT YOU ARE ON
IN THAT NONDISCLOSURE PROCESS. IN THAT NONDISCLOSURE PROCESS.
SO IT SEEMS TO ME THAT THE SO IT SEEMS TO ME THAT THE
VICE PRESIDENT WAS ABSOLUTELY VICE PRESIDENT WAS ABSOLUTELY
CORRECT TO CALL FOR THE FULL CORRECT TO CALL FOR THE FULL
DISCLOSURE. DISCLOSURE.
THE CALL FOR THE FREEDOM IF THE THE CALL FOR THE FREEDOM IF THE
PERSON WANTS TO. PERSON WANTS TO.
SOME OF THEM MAY NOT WANT TO SO SOME OF THEM MAY NOT WANT TO SO
IT IS LEGITIMATELY PLAY OUT TO IT IS LEGITIMATELY PLAY OUT TO
BE ABLE TO MAKE THAT CHOICE. BE ABLE TO MAKE THAT CHOICE.
>>Ed: LAST QUESTION IN IOWA,>>Ed: LAST QUESTION IN IOWA,
YOU WERE OVERHEARD ON A YOU WERE OVERHEARD ON A
CELL PHONE ALLEGEDLY SAYING THAT CELL PHONE ALLEGEDLY SAYING THAT
BERNIE SANDERS MAY RUN AWAY WITH BERNIE SANDERS MAY RUN AWAY WITH
THIS IN YOUR PARTY WILL BE IN THIS IN YOUR PARTY WILL BE IN
DANGER IF THAT HAPPENS AND YOU DANGER IF THAT HAPPENS AND YOU
SAID MAYBE I AM BLEEPING SAID MAYBE I AM BLEEPING
DELUDING MYSELF HERE BUT MAYBE DELUDING MYSELF HERE BUT MAYBE
YOU SHOULD GET INTO THE RACE. YOU SHOULD GET INTO THE RACE.
HE LATER TWEETED THAT’S NOT HE LATER TWEETED THAT’S NOT
REALLY WHAT HAPPEN. REALLY WHAT HAPPEN.
FINAL POINT, YOU’VE GOT IN THE FINAL POINT, YOU’VE GOT IN THE
PRESIDENTIAL THING TOTALLY OUT PRESIDENTIAL THING TOTALLY OUT
OF YOUR SYSTEM AND YOU’RE NOT OF YOUR SYSTEM AND YOU’RE NOT
RUNNING? RUNNING?
>>OF COURSE I’M NOT RUNNING.>>OF COURSE I’M NOT RUNNING.
I AM SITTING HERE SUPPORTING I AM SITTING HERE SUPPORTING
SOMEBODY THAT I THINK WILL MAKE SOMEBODY THAT I THINK WILL MAKE
A TERRIFIC PRESIDENT OF THE A TERRIFIC PRESIDENT OF THE
UNITED STATES BUT NOBODY SHOULD UNITED STATES BUT NOBODY SHOULD
TAKE A ONE SIDED OVERHEARD TAKE A ONE SIDED OVERHEARD
CONVERSATION AND TRY TO MAKE CONVERSATION AND TRY TO MAKE
CONCLUSIONS ABOUT WHAT IT WAS. CONCLUSIONS ABOUT WHAT IT WAS.
I RECEIVED A PHONE CALL FROM I RECEIVED A PHONE CALL FROM
SOMEBODY WHO WAS EXPRESSING THAT SOMEBODY WHO WAS EXPRESSING THAT
CONCERN AND I RESPONDED TO THAT CONCERN AND I RESPONDED TO THAT
CONCERN AND HAD A CONVERSATION. CONCERN AND HAD A CONVERSATION.
IS ONE SIDED AND I MADE IT IS ONE SIDED AND I MADE IT
CRYSTAL CLEAR I AM HERE CRYSTAL CLEAR I AM HERE
SUPPORTING THE VICE PRESIDENT OF SUPPORTING THE VICE PRESIDENT OF
THE UNITED STATES, FORMER THE UNITED STATES, FORMER
VICE PRESIDENT WHO I THINK HAD A VICE PRESIDENT WHO I THINK HAD A
TERRIFIC NIGHT LAST NIGHT AND TERRIFIC NIGHT LAST NIGHT AND
NEVADA. NEVADA.
>>Ed: A DIVIDED CONVENTION,>>Ed: A DIVIDED CONVENTION,
WOULD YOU PUT YOUR NAME IN THERE WOULD YOU PUT YOUR NAME IN THERE
IF THERE WAS A DIVIDED IF THERE WAS A DIVIDED
CONVENTION? CONVENTION?
>>THAT’S NOT HOW IT WORKS.>>THAT’S NOT HOW IT WORKS.
I DON’T EVEN KNOW HOW IT WORKS I DON’T EVEN KNOW HOW IT WORKS
BUT I’M TELLING YOU RIGHT NOW BUT I’M TELLING YOU RIGHT NOW
THAT THE RACE WILL CHANGE THAT THE RACE WILL CHANGE
BETWEEN NOW, I THINK, AND SUPER BETWEEN NOW, I THINK, AND SUPER
TUESDAY AND IT NEEDS TO BECAUSE TUESDAY AND IT NEEDS TO BECAUSE
THERE ARE FOUR CANDIDATES NOW THERE ARE FOUR CANDIDATES NOW
DIVIDING UP VOTES AND NO MATTER DIVIDING UP VOTES AND NO MATTER
WHAT HAPPENS, IF YOU GO TO THE WHAT HAPPENS, IF YOU GO TO THE
CONVENTION AND THERE IS NOT A CONVENTION AND THERE IS NOT A
MAJORITY FOR ONE CANDIDATE OF MAJORITY FOR ONE CANDIDATE OF
THOSE DELEGATES, THEN THE RULES THOSE DELEGATES, THEN THE RULES
ARE CRYSTAL CLEAR. ARE CRYSTAL CLEAR.
THOSE ARE THE RULES. THOSE ARE THE RULES.
AT FOUR AGO, BERNIE SANDERS AT FOUR AGO, BERNIE SANDERS
SUPPORTED THE RULES ON THE OTHER SUPPORTED THE RULES ON THE OTHER
SIDE OF THAT COIN, SO I THINK SIDE OF THAT COIN, SO I THINK
THAT YOU CAN’T JUST BE FLIPPING THAT YOU CAN’T JUST BE FLIPPING
IT FOR CONVENIENCE. IT FOR CONVENIENCE.
RULES MATTER, THE RULES OF THE RULES MATTER, THE RULES OF THE
PARTY MAKE IT CLEAR THAT WE WILL PARTY MAKE IT CLEAR THAT WE WILL
VOTE UNTIL THE MAJORITY OF VOTE UNTIL THE MAJORITY OF
DUGOUT MACK DELEGATES HAVE

Author:

100 thoughts on “John Kerry reacts to Trump accusing him of violating Logan Act”

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *