Google is biased by design says Director of ‘The Creepy Line’

Google is biased by design says Director of ‘The Creepy Line’


STUART: BETTER GET BACK TO A STORY WHICH THIS PROGRAM BROUGHT YOU YESTERDAY. FORMER EDITOR OF “PSYCHOLOGY TODAY” WENT ON THE RECORD IN FRONT OF CONGRESS AND SAID GOOGLE MANIPULATED VOTES IN THE 2016 ELECTION BECAUSE OF BIAS IN SEARCH. ROLL TAPE.>>YOU TESTIFIED BEFORE THIS COMMITTEE THAT GOOGLE’S MANIPULATION OF VOTES GAVE AT LEAST 2.6 MILLION ADDITIONAL VOTES TO HILLARY CLINTON IN THE YEAR 2016. IS THAT CORRECT?>>THAT’S CORRECT.>>YOUR TESTIMONY IS THAT GOOGLE IS, THROUGH BIAS IN SEARCH RESULTS, MANIPULATING VOTERS IN A WAY THEY’RE NOT AWARE OF?>>ON A MASSIVE SCALE.>>IF UNDERSTOOD YOUR TESTIMONY CORRECTLY, YOU SAID IN SUBSEQUENT ELECTIONS, GOOGLE AND FACEBOOK AND TWITTER AND BIG TECH’S MANIPULATION COULD MANIPULATE AS MANY AS 15 MILLION VOTES IN A SUBSEQUENT ELECTION?>>IN 2020, IF ALL THESE COMPANIES ARE SUPPORTING THE SAME CANDIDATE, THERE ARE 15 MILLION VOTES ON THE LINE THAT CAN BE SHIFTED WITHOUT PEOPLE’S KNOWLEDGE AND WITHOUT LEAVING A PAPER TRAIL FOR AUTHORITIES TO TRACE. ASHLEY: GOOD GRIEF. STUART: I CALL THAT REALLY POWERFUL STUFF. HOWEVER, YES, THERE ARE QUESTIONS ABOUT DR. EPSTEIN’S METHODOLOGY AND HOW HE CAME UP WITH THOSE NUMBERS. WITH US NOW, THE DIRECTOR OF THE CREEPY LINE, THAT’S A DOCUMENTARY ABOUT BIG TECH FINDING ITS WAY INTO OUR PERSONAL LIVES. BEFORE WE GET TO HIM, JUST ROLL THIS CLIP. ROLL TAPE.>>YOU’RE SEARCHING FOR THE MOST PRIVATE STUFF ON GOOGLE, THINGS THAT YOUR WIFE OR SPOUSE MIGHT NOT WANT YOU TO KNOW ABOUT.>>FACEBOOK CONSTANTLY MANIPULATES THEIR USERS. THEY DO IT BY THE THINGS THEY INSERT INTO THE NEWS FEED. THEY DO IT BY THE TYPES OF HOSTS THEY ALLOW THEIR USERS TO SEE. STT THE DIRECTOR OF THE MOVIE WITH THE CLIP OF WHICH YOU JUST SAW IS WITH US. WELCOME BACK TO THE PROGRAM.>>GLAD TO BE HERE. STUART: IS THERE ANY WAY TO PROVE THE NUMBERS WHICH DR. EPSTEIN WAS USING?>>LOOK, AT THIS POINT, WE DON’T HAVE PROOF THAT THESE VOTES WERE MOVED. ONE THING WE DO KNOW IS THAT THE WAY THE GOOGLE SEARCH ENGINE WORKS, IF I SEARCH FOR STUART VARNEY, IT HAS TO DO TWO THINGS. IT HAS TO SELECT PAGES OUT OF BILLIONS OF PAGES, BIAS NUMBER ONE, AND HAS TO PUT THEM IN AN ORDER. SO THE ENGINE IS BIASED BY DESIGN. THAT’S THE BASELINE. WHEN GOOGLE SAYS THERE’S NO BIAS, IT IS BIAS. IF I SAY WHICH IS THE BEST CANDIDATE, IT HAS TO PUT ONE FIRST. SO THE METHODOLOGY WHICH HE USES SHOWS THAT THERE’S POTENTIAL FOR MANIPULATION IF THEY SO CHOOSE. THAT IS THE IMPORTANT THING HERE. IF THEY SO CHOOSE. GOOGLE SHOWS ANY BIAS INTERNALLY TOWARDS ONE CANDIDATE OR ANOTHER, THE POTENTIAL THAT DR. EPSTEIN SHOWED IS THERE TO DO WHAT HE SAID THEY COULD DO. STUART: BUT WE DON’T KNOW THAT THEY ARE ACTUALLY DOING THAT. FOR EXAMPLE, IN THE 2010 ELECTION, FACEBOOK SENT OUT A MESSAGE, GET OUT THE VOTE, LIKE A PUBLIC SERVICE MESSAGE, GET OUT THE VOTE. THEY SENT IT TO 60 MILLION PEOPLE. BUT MY UNDERSTANDING IS THEY ONLY SENT IT TO DEMOCRATS. THEY KNEW WHO THEY WERE. THAT SHIFTED 360,000 VOTES. ACCORDING TO DR. EPSTEIN. IT SOUNDS VALID TO ME.>>LOOK, IT IS DEFINITELY — HE WAS PROPOSING A MONITORING SYSTEM TO CALCULATE BIAS. THAT IS WHAT HE’S PROPOSING. HE SAYS BECAUSE THESE POTENTIALS ARE THERE AND BECAUSE WE SAW STATISTICAL BIAS, STATISTICAL BIAS IN THE SEARCHES OF THE PEOPLE THAT WERE IN THE STUDY, WHAT IT SHOWS IS IT WAS BIASED TOP TEN FOR HILLARY CLINTON. THAT IS WHAT HIS RESEARCH SHOWED. AGAIN, WHETHER IT HAPPENED, WE DON’T KNOW. BUT WHAT WE DO KNOW IS THE POTENTIAL IS THERE AND HIS RESEARCH, THE PEOPLE HE STUDIED, IT DID HAPPEN. NOW, WHETHER IT CONVERTED TO A VOTE, I CANNOT SAY. STUART: WE CANNOT CONFIRM –>>WE CANNOT CONFIRM. STUART: — THE NUMBERS.>>WE CAN CONFIRM HIS RESEARCH IS EXTREMELY VALID. THE METHODOLOGY IS VERY SOUND BECAUSE THE ENGINE IS BIASED BY DESIGN. STUART: THAT GENTLEMAN, DR. EPSTEIN, IS IN FACT A VOTER FOR HILLARY CLINTON.>>ABSOLUTELY. STUART: HE WAS PUBLICLY VERY MUCH IN FAVOR OF HILLARY CLINTON.>>ABSOLUTELY. STUART: IN THE 2016 ELECTION. WHAT TO ME, IT’S SO INSIDIOUS BECAUSE YOU DON’T KNOW WHAT THEY’RE DOING. THEY HAVE ASTRONOMICAL POWER BETWEEN THEM. THERE ARE THREE MULTI-BILLIONAIRES, ALL OF THEM ARE WORTH $50 BILLION PLUS, AND THEY ARE THE NEW BIG BROTHERS. THAT’S THE WAY IT SEEMS TO ME.>>NO, IT IS. I MEAN, THIS IS THE THING. I KNOW DR. EPSTEIN VERY WELL. WE HAVE GONE THROUGH THE RESEARCH. EVEN THE POTENTIAL OF A COMPANY DOING THIS IS DANGEROUS AND UNDERMINES DEMOCRACY AND HIS RESEARCH, REMEMBER, HE DID THE TEST IN INDIA IN 2014, HE DID IT IN 2016 AND HE DID IT AGAIN IN 2018. SO WE HAVE MANY ELECTIONS THAT HE HAS DONE THIS RESEARCH IN THAT HAVE SHOWN SIMILAR RESULTS, IF NOT THE SAME RESULTS, AND LOOK, AT THE VERY LEAST, JUST LET US KNOW IT’S NOT HAPPENING, GOOGLE. BE TRANSPARENT. IF IT’S NOT HAPPENING, THEN SHOW US.

Author:

65 thoughts on “Google is biased by design says Director of ‘The Creepy Line’”

  • Black Dove's Youtube Channel says:

    Google will probably be pushing Kamala as the nominee soon. She is being backed by the same communists(Rainbow Coalition) that backed Obama.

  • Texas Cowpatti says:

    Non-traceable votes, TAKE 'EM DOWN NOW!!! Even at this point if not proven, the POTENTIAL is monumentally insidious!! But must say, in using Google as a search engine, the bias and misinformation is truly apparent!

  • Richard Strong says:

    If you are conservative and use google the bias is clear. Google manipulates search results and alters information .

  • Google and other social media cause more election damage than Russia and China combined! Now their employees are trying to boycott working with ICE!

  • Point of Personal Privilege; Majesty, her Majesty says:

    This is why I use duckduckgo. Search in google for, "Clinton body c" and "trump body c" and you will have it autofill for Trump and not Clinton even though it has been a saying for decades now and the Trump one only trended in California very recently.

  • Distract the masses with "racism" and "Russia"… meanwhile actual evil is being done right under our noses. Ditch google, use duckduckgo. It's that easy.

  • Google is biased. They even cater to CNN, Washington Post, and New York Times among others to attack everything going on in Trumps life. Anyone with a brain can see it on their Google News. It's just plain dirty.

  • Project Veritas has tons of evidence that google does in fact manipulate their search results with political bias. How is it these 2 guys don't even mention it???

  • Break these oligarchical publishers (not platforms) up for monopoly and corrupting our voting process FTC. Break them into hundreds of small companies not owned by the same people.

  • mitchel obrist says:

    just so people know you tube chopping any fox news coverage so fox your going the right direction keep it up -iss on you tuber

  • Chris Shanholtzer says:

    So will I get attention if I kick somebody that works for Google in the skull and grind their brains in to the sea meant just curious

  • Jerry Manlangit says:

    If bias exists, that's demonic and google must be made to pay for it. Deciding an election thtough electronic means would be the end of America. Cant believe it. My brain rebels.

  • I completely cut off Facebook from my diet of social media. And I support breaking up Google sooner than later. Tampering with viewership and steering content for a political out come is Orwellian and some thing I do not support. Break them up and do your job Congress!!!

  • Dear leftists. Your intolerance, fake moral outrage/righteous indignation, name calling, character assassinations, free speech censorship (especially by Google, Facebook, and Twitter), and bullying are NOT indications of your self-proclaimed moral superiority. You obviously believe that your ideology is “the truth” and that you alone have the only true grip on political reality. Yet you ignore, deny, and/or misrepresent any facts or evidence that would debunk your dogmatic, self-righteous world-view. Look in the mirror and in your heart of hearts and honestly ask yourself why ANY conservative would ever want to switch to the Democrat party, a political party whose members far too often brand anyone who disagrees with their message/narrative as a racist, homophobe, xenophobe, bigot, white supremacist, Islamophobia, or a misogynist.

  • Just a thought for anybody who thinks this is a conspiracy. Google , Facebook , and other platforms that sell ads have an algorithm to decide who to send what ad to. So let’s you paid them to advertise for your meat company they will show your ad for people who seem to be meat lovers and they won’t play it for seemingly vegan people and they have algorithms to discern who’s who. So it really wouldn’t take much effort for them wether they’re paid for it or not to send a “get out the vote” to only left leaning people. As to wether or not that’s illegal or should be is a conversion we should have but it goes much further than that. With these same algorithms if you are a conservative leaning person they can bombard you with ads from leftist organizations or if independent or show the lefts side of the story to get you to vote liberal. But in a sense this isn’t any different than a newspaper or radio show just on a much larger scale. The one difference between them is you can choose not to buy that newspaper or listen to a show but when it comes to social media is Facebook owns basically everything and buys any new credible competitor which should be illegal. Google is the largest search engine and their ads appear on a large amount of websites. The only person who should be censoring a search is the one doing the search and that should be a law!

  • Google is a c.i.a pawn a front if you will same as facebook. Two monopolys that need removed. Shut down both remove both companys. Find the criminals and gitmo them

  • Sascha Haywood says:

    Oh!..You..Bet..the..Corps..were..involved..they..were..all..prob..invested..in..the..Hillary..Haiti..Foundation..they..were..manipulating..everything..along..with..the.MOB,DState,Evil.Elites,Illumadonkey!!!…whatever..you..want..to…call..it..their..all..related!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!…including..epstein!!!

  • 🔴 We could not video I made on my YouTube channel so I had give the URL, I am not shocked at all, YouTube killed my old channel and when they hit my current channel with a shadow ban my views almost instantly fell from 5,300 views a hour to more like 20 views a hour!

  • All you have to do is search for something news related and you will get all the low ratings fake news channels first even though Fox News has double the ratings of all the fake news sources combined. That’s all the proof I need that they tamper with elections. If I have to manually type Fox News after my search to get to real news google is broken. Again fox has twice the ratings of cnn msnbc and others combined. It should be first in search results. That is how they should rank it. By tv ratings.

  • This tells me something very special. There are people who do not believe that Donald Trump is the legitimately elected President of the United States. Yet even though Google and other elements may have cheated in favor of his opponent, he still won!

  • Sure. I only get pro-Democrat push notifications from these big tech companies. I’ve experienced this, and I believe most consumers have as well.

  • Easy to prove.
    The time that the reminder was sent out, and within a certain time frame, you can track the voter to a voting station.
    They use google tracking,plenty of evidence.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *