Giuliani slams Mueller’s ‘ethics’ over public Russia probe remarks

Giuliani slams Mueller’s ‘ethics’ over public Russia probe remarks


IT TAKES OUT OF WASHINGTON>>Bill: BRET, I WANT TO BRING IN RUDY GIULIANI BY TELEPHONE NOW, THE PRESIDENT’S ATTORNEY. THANK YOU FOR YOUR TIME. GO AHEAD. YOU WATCHED BOB MUELLER. YOUR REACTION TO WHAT HE SAID.>>I DON’T THINK IT’S MUCH OF A REACTION. IT JUST REPEATS THE REPORT. HE SAID NO EVIDENCE OR INSUFFICIENT EVIDENCE, THE SAME THING FOR A PROSECUTOR. OF COLLUSION. AND ALTHOUGH HE COULDN’T REACH A DECISION ON OBSTRUCTION, THAT’S HIS DECISION. WHEN A PROSECUTOR CAN’T REACH A DECISION THAT’S THE DECISION. THERE IS NO CASE ON OBSTRUCTION, THERE IS NO CASE ON COLLUSION. WHEN HE GOES ON TO DISCUSS THE D.O.J. POLICY, WE ALL KNOW THAT’S THE D.O.J. POLICY. WHEN I FIRST MET HIM HE WAS UNSURE WHETHER HE COULD INDICT OR NOT. BUT OBVIOUSLY HE CAN’T. WE ALL KNOW THAT. HE STILL WANTED HIS OPINIONS IN THE REPORT. THE REPORT IS 430 PAGES OF OPINION. SO THE REALITY IS HE OFFERED HIS OPINION ON COLLUSION AND OBSTRUCTION, OPINION ON COLLUSION WAS THERE IS NO CASE. OPINION ON OBSTRUCTION WAS THAT HE COULDN’T CONCLUDE THAT THE PRESIDENT COMMITTED OBSTRUCTION.>>Bill: TWO THINGS IF I COULD INTERJECT. INSUFFICIENT EVIDENCE ON RUSSIAN COLLUSION. WHAT DOES THAT SUGGEST TO YOU WHEN HE CONCLUDES IT THAT WAY? DO YOU BELIEVE THAT IS STATED ANY DIFFERENTLY THAN IN THE MUELLER REPORT?>>NO. THERE ARE ALL DIFFERENT WAYS OF SAYING IT. THE REALITY IS THAT’S WHAT A PROSECUTOR DOES. WHEN HE HAS THE — IT IS COMPLETELY FOREIGN TO AMERICAN LAW. I DID IT FOR YEARS, I NEVER EXONERATED ANYONE. I FOUND IS THERE ENOUGH EVIDENCE TO BRING A CHARGE OR ISN’T THERE? IF NOT ENOUGH EVIDENCE TO BRING A CHARGE, END OF CASE, CASE IS OVER.>>Bill: AS A LAWYER, WHY DOES HE USE THAT LANGUAGE INSUFFICIENT EVIDENCE?>>BECAUSE I BELIEVE SPENDING ALL THAT TIME WITH PEOPLE LIKEWISEMAN HE HAS LOST HIS NOTION OF AMERICAN STATUS. I THINK TO ME AS A LAWYER IT’S ASTOUNDING THAT HE IS EXPOUNDING ON CAN WE OR CAN’T WE EXONERATE. CAN’T WE DO THIS OR THAT. THE REALITY IS HE DOESN’T HAVE A COLLUSION CASE OR AN OBSTRUCTION CASE. IF HE WAS CONSTRAINED BY THIS JUSTICE DEPARTMENT RULE WHY DID HE DO THE INVESTIGATION AT ALL?>>Bill: WHEN DO YOU THINK HE KNEW THERE WAS INSUFFICIENT EVIDENCE ZBLIE THINK THE REPUBLICANS WOULD HAVE A FIELD DAY WITH HIM. I THINK HE CONCLUDED THAT A YEAR BEFORE. IN FACT, I THINK IT’S GOING TO COME OUT IN THE NEXT COUPLE OF MONTHS THE INVESTIGATION SHOULD NEVER HAVE BEEN STARTED IN THE FIRST PLACE.>>Bill: ARE YOU SUGGESTING IT’S APRIL OR MAY OF 2018?>>I THINK WHEN PAPADOPOULOS FELL APART THAT HE KNEW THEY DIDN’T HAVE A CASE.>>Bill: I DON’T KNOW WHEN THAT DATE WAS?>>I DON’T KNOW EXACTLY WHEN BUT IT WAS A YEAR BEFORE THEY FILED THEIR REPORT.>>Bill: ON THE OBSTRUCTION CHARGE HERE HE SAID BASED ON LONGSTANDING GUIDELINES THE PRESIDENT CANNOT BE CHARGED. NOW, YOU FOUGHT FOR A YEAR TO MAKE SURE THAT PRESIDENT TRUMP DID NOT SIT DOWN WITH BOB MUELLER OR ANYONE ON HIS TEAM. YOU DID SUBMIT ANSWERS ON PAPER, QUESTION AND ANSWER BACK AND FORTH BUT NO FACE-TO-FACE INTERVIEW. HE IS MAKING THE CASE THAT A SITTING PRESIDENT CANNOT BE CHARGED. WHAT DO YOU THINK OF THAT?>>THAT’S THE LAW. A SITTING PRESIDENT CAN’T BE CHARGED. SO THEN IF THAT’S THE CASE, THEN WHY DID HE OFFER ALL THOSE OPINIONS? WHY DID HE OFFER ALL THOSE RECOMMENDATIONS AND SUGGESTIONS? WHY DID HE INVESTIGATE? THE REALITY IS THAT HE GAVE US HIS OPINION ON COLLUSION AND OBSTRUCTION. HIS OPINION IS YOU CAN’T BRING A CASE. BOB, THAT’S THE END OF IT. THAT’S WHAT A PROSECUTOR DOES. YOU DON’T PROVE NEGATIVES. IT’S IMPOSSIBLE TO DO THAT. WHAT THEY’VE DONE HERE IS A PERVERSION, A COMBINATION OF HIM AND THE MEDIA. I’M SURPRISED WITH BOB. HE IS A BETTER LAWYER THAN THAT. I DON’T KNOW WHERE THIS NOTION HE HAS TO EXONERATE.>>Bill: I WANT TO SQUEEZE IN MORE QUESTIONS. HAVE YOU SPOKEN TO THE PRESIDENT IN THE PAST HOUR?>>I DON’T COMMENT ON THAT.>>Bill: DID YOU SPEAK TO THE PRESIDENT — THE WORD WAS THE WHITE HOUSE KNEW BOB MUELLER WOULD MAKE A STATEMENT TODAY. WERE YOU AWARE OF THE MATERIAL OR WHAT BOB MUELLER WAS GOING TO SAY?>>I THOUGHT HE WOULD DO WHAT HE DID. BASICALLY REPEATED HIS REPORT. IT’S A FIVE-MINUTE VERSION OF HIS REPORT AND THIS WHOLE — WHAT DID HE SAY? HE SAID I DON’T HAVE A COLLUSION CASE AND I DON’T HAVE AN OBSTRUCTION CASE. HE SAYS DIFFERENT THINGS ABOUT IT BUT THAT’S THE CONCLUSION AND THAT’S ALL THAT MATTERS FROM THE POINT OF A PROSECUTOR. THE REAL QUESTION WHETHER IT’S ETHICAL AT ALL TO BE DISCUSSING IT OR WRITING ABOUT IT. IF YOU CONCLUDED YOU CAN’T BRING A CASE THE RULES OF ETHICS SAY YOU HAVE TO KEEP YOUR MOUTH SHUT AS A PROSECUTOR. 430 PAGES OF REGURGITATING EVERY POSSIBLE THING THEY COULD REGURGITATE MUCH OF WHICH WAS UNFAIR.>>Bill: YOU KNOW THAT DEMOCRATS WILL GO FORWARD POSSIBLY — HERE IS THE STATEMENT FROM JERRY NADLER THAT CAME OUT.>>I’M SURE IT WILL BE OBJECTIVE.>>HE SAID GIVEN THAT SPECIAL COUNSEL MUELLER WAS UNABLE TO PURSUE CRIMINAL CHARGES AGAINST THE PRESIDENT IT FALLS TO CONGRESS TO RESPOND TO THE CRIMES AND WRONGDOING OF PRESIDENT TRUMP AND WE WILL DO SO. NO ONE, NOT EVEN THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES IS ABOVE THE LAW. END QUOTE FROM JERRY NADLER.>>HE JUST PROVED HE SHOULDN’T BE THE CHAIRMAN OF THAT COMMITTEE BY SAYING — JERRY NADLER HAS FIGURED OUT ALREADY WITHOUT AN INVESTIGATION THAT HE WILL RESPOND TO THE CRIMES OF THE PRESIDENT? EVEN MUELLER DIDN’T SAY THAT. MUELLER SAID HE COULDN’T REACH A CONCLUSION. JERRY HAS ALREADY REACHED A CONCLUSION. SOMETHING AS SENSITIVE AS THIS, SOMEBODY LIKE THAT SHOULDN’T BE SITTING AS THE JUDGE. THIS IS WHAT I’M SAYING, YOU’RE GUILTY, I’M GOING TO HANG YOU, LET ME GIVE YOU A TRIAL NOW. JERRY NADLER HAS GONE SO FAR IN SHOWING HIS PREJUDICE THAT IT IS TOTALLY INTOLERABLE THAT HE IS THE CHAIRMAN OF THAT COMMITTEE WITHOUT COMING TO THE CONCLUSION THAT IS TRULY IS A WITCH HUNT.>>Bill: HOW REAL IS IT THEY MOVE FORWARD ON IMPEACHMENT?>>I DON’T KNOW HOW REAL IT IS. THAT’S BEING HANDLED BY THE WHITE HOUSE COUNSEL. FROM MY POINT OF VIEW UNLESS NADLER IS REMOVED AND THEY PUT A CHAIRMAN ON THERE WHO AT LEAST HASN’T MADE ALL SORTS OF PREJUDICIAL COMMENTS THAT A CRIME HAS BEEN COMMITTED WHERE NOBODY ELSE HAS, I WOULD THINK THEIR INVESTIGATION IS ILLEGITIMATE.

Author:

100 thoughts on “Giuliani slams Mueller’s ‘ethics’ over public Russia probe remarks”

  • Giuliani is Trumps Lawer…!!! We heard the same spin from OJ Simpson's Lawyer …"if it doesn't fit you must aquit"…. We all know OJ Did it… but the "Defense" lawyers would never say that. Plain and simple …If Trump was not the President he would be in JAIL!

  • Josh Ferguson says:

    Fox literally brainwashed millions to think that what they see and hear is fake news and everyone is doing this because they “hate” the president. This is absolutely the most corrupt administration in America’s history by a mile.

  • Charles Wise says:

    By Nadler's own words he should have no ill words when they go after Berry. After all, NO one should be above the LAW!

  • Grampa Fox News is off his meds again. The louder Trump and his ilk react, the more you know they are triggered by the truth. Impeach

  • Steve Monroe says:

    Mueller specifically stated that he is NOT permitted to indite; that that is Congresses job. He then provided evidence of over 10 examples of obstruction for Congress to use for impeachment. Not to mention, we ALL watched trump obstruct on TV and Twitter.

  • Tennessee Trawlerman says:

    Barr has been trying to RE-define the roll of a DOJ Special Prosecutor, and spin the Mueller report in favor of Trump. Several things are clear from Robert Mueller's public testimony:
    1.) He could not pin down collusion, so fair enough, that should be dropped as a subject.
    2.) He was aware that regardless of how obvious and clear the basis for an obstruction of justice charge was, by the DOJ rules, he could not "charge" the President with that since a sitting President can not be convicted on such a charge, regardless of how obvious the efforts to obstruct were (and they clearly were).
    3.) There is ample evidence in the report that the President and his team did everything in their power to obstruct the investigation, and were he anyone other than the President, — he would have been charged.

    4.) Since there exists the ridiculous rule that a President is somehow above the ordinary law of us mortals, the correct procedure to pursue is that the evidence gained by the Special Counsel should be presented to Congress, and they should take the appropriate action.

    I and a preponderance of Americans sincerely hope they do.

  • Stephen Kershaw says:

    how serious should you take it when sleazy unethical hacks like Giuliani questions a Patriot's impeccable service record, dedication to his country and respectibility.
    Guiliani continues his anti Americanism.

  • Trump officials making claims about "ethics". That's funny stuff coming from the most unethical, corrupt, and dishonest administration in over 100 years. Project much?

  • They are going to stretch the shadow of impeachment out as long as they can without actually impeaching Trump. To keep impeachment in the news and on voters minds. It absolutely worked on the 2018 elections. Shadow of Mueller's Investigation.

  • NoNadsler is a commie tool. I pray everyday his little pink body has a significant impact with a really big bus.

  • Bob Mueller said that the Russians interfered with the 2016 American presidential election.
    He said that Trump obstructed his investigation into that interference.
    This is just the opposite of what William Barr said about the Mueller investigation.
    So, the truth is out. Where do we go from here?

  • Benjamin Pruett says:

    Its insane the most dishonest folks I've ever seen like Rudy calling someone dishonest.  Man we have you on video with documented lying.

  • Teresa Kelley says:

    Mueller is guilty of collusion with Russia he conspired with Hillary to sell America’s uranium to Russia. Mueller, himself delivered the uranium sample to Russia 🇷🇺. So Mueller is guilty of TREASON

  • Teresa Kelley says:

    Mueller knew from the beginning, Mueller was fleecing America taxpayers !!
    What a Scammer, he is like Hillary and Bill corrupt to the core !!!!!! Bob Mueller is a thief, a liar, he committed treason when he delivered the uranium to Russia under Obama and Hillary!!!!!!
    Jerry Nadler is the criminal and a corrupt politician, Nadler should be REMOVED congress

  • Dolores Cook says:

    Mr barr, it's your turn, you're the one w/ the brains & the ethics. I'm very surprised you were chosen to conclude this jumble of lies & fraud. They are all so dumb.

  • Alfidio Valera says:

    Donald Trump: The Greatest Presidential Harassment in history. After spending $40,000,000 over two dark years, with unlimited access, people, resources and cooperation, highly conflicted Robert Mueller would have brought charges, if he had ANYTHING, but there were no charges to bring!

  • Richard Folkman says:

    It's getting down to the nitty gritty! Conservatives and Republicans have to call it what it is. Let the Left, and all its subversives, be called what they are and deal with them. Take off the gloves because these Socialists are bent on overthrow of America.

  • The taxpayers got shafted on this deal. Mueller did not deliver anything — pro or con !!! Mueller knew beforehand a sitting President cannot be indicted, then what was his real motive in accepting to investigate? How much did he made in this deal? Two years of investigation knowingly in advance it will come out tantamountly to nothing?!?!

  • Guilty or not ? Insufficient evidence means after two years ; forget about it ! Not guilty verdict !! Nothing to find !!

  • kristina daniels says:

    Mueller is trying to justify $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$ he received and was allowed to get by with.
    ………

  • Dems don't even understand basic justice "innocent until proven guilty". They don't understand basic law, because Dems are mostly women and children (18-25). Low info voters.

  • Giuliani clearly hasn't read the report or listened to what Mueller said. "If he feels constrained by the Department of Justice rule, why did he do the investigation at all?" He told us why. First, the investigation was into the Trump campaign and the trail to which it might lead. It wasn't just into Trump himself. And it lead to 25 indictments. Second, as Mueller made clear, there was ample evidence of conclusion by Trump himself and it is now Congress' duty under the Constitution to do something about that. Third, as he also said, it was intended to collect evidence while I is still fresh so that future prosecutors who may decide to indict Trump have it available to them. Rudy and the Foxsters can bob and weave all they want, but them's the facts.

  • Maximus Carsonite says:

    Mueller needs to answer a boatload of questions. He was a part of the filthy cabal that wanted to take down the President. Once all the docs have been unclassified, Mueller will be eating out of the same bowl as Aventatti – hopeful behind bars!

  • Giuliani dream of making his own laws and procedures … for him … whoever pays him .. has the "right to commit any crime". Filthy mentality … But the Constitution Exist in America and it is different from Russia, Arabia, India, China, etc.
    If the President has Committed Crimes that only Congress can address… and not his own DOJ who's Boss is the very same President… than Giuliani is of to shut his mouth.

  • Rudy Giuliani, who underwent a physical last week, received some startling news today when his cholesterol count turned out to be a whopping 375. What effect this will have on the minds of the voters remains to be seen. In another development, Mayor Dinkins has fired his top advisor, Lloyd Braun, who is believed to be responsible for the name tag fiasco. We now take you to Giuliani headquarters where Rudy Giuliani is about to make a statement.

  • oldfatbaldguy48 says:

    Innocent until proven guilty …unless you're Trump. Mueller needs a trip to prison with the rest of them.

  • It was not an opinion there was proofs his son came out and he said he met with the Russians to dig dirt on Clinton.. The president of United States stupid in public and asked Russia to look for the emails opinions are we blind are we DEF

  • Shame on this host for not asking the correct questions shame shame shame I’ve never listen to this person and I don’t even know what the heck is his name … this is my last time

    There is hundreds and hundreds of evidence that he collude and he obstruct it just cannot be linked to the president but is linked to his campaign

  • THE only thing President Trump is obstructing is the dems and rinos collusion with the Russians and an attempted coup against our duly elected President. We need some good news hope the declass is made public soon.

  • Limen Kenneth says:

    Then we stop asking Trump bank statement because no use we can’t even say if a president commit a crime or no ?

  • World peace Everyone says:

    Muller is hand picked by the democrats …so he has to try to make something sound fishy….to show democrats that he had done all he can……please get off his back ..it's a message to the democrats .

  • Roger Wilsonn says:

    Everybody's missing the picture the Democrats said they wanted to talk to Mueller so did the Republicans Mueller was telling the Democrats not to subpoena him because he didn't want to answer the Republicans questions think about it that's all it was about.

  • Scott Hendrickson says:

    Trump needs to cut Rudy loose…. he's so far past his prime he hurts Trump dar more than he helps him. If he won't cut him loose, maybe he'll have a stroke or get run over by a truck…

  • Michael Hensley says:

    His TV statement is an effort to avoid testifying where he will be asked tough questions; what did the FBI know about the phony dossier and who pushed it to the FISA court, did the FBI entrap Papadopoulos using foreign agents, when did he conclude there was no collusion
    (why did he not stop there), why did he go after the Trump team for things that had nothing to do with the Russian investigation.??????

  • Too many dedicated hard working FBI and Int career agents are leaving because of this corrupt administration and cohorts and under fire for doing their jobs to protect this country instead of Trump. .how many more have to die by the sword before justice prevail.

  • Sleeze dog is what comes to mind now when Giuliani's name comes up, why is that…. the proof is here, and he makes it easy for people to find, everytime he speaks, in the direction where the wind is blowing.

  • Mueller has Nadler/Pelosi hanging like a barracuda around a chum dump. Every obfuscative utterance by Mueller has them wetting their Depends. Mueller is taking the low hanging fruit of the dimwit party (Nadler, Schitt, Peloisi, Swalwell, et al), and showing them for the brainless dupes they are. Mueller has a personal grudge against Trump, and the dimwit Dems are carrying his water. TRUMP 2020

  • investigation is over. and as per the basics/natural laws, you can now discuss about the evidences. so what are the evidences, which suggest that the crime has been or might have been committed?????? Insufficient in law doesn't mean there are a few evidences but not sufficient enough. Insufficient means no credible evidence, prima fascia, based upon which the cognizance could be taken, or even the further investigation is required. Talking about improper provisions, loop holes, unjustified restrictions bla bla bla couldn't prove any crime. Show the evidence, in any form, just a little bit of sight and or the little bit of sound, that proves, it is sufficient enough to move ahead and charge the person and take proper action, as per the provisions of the law. Did a single person on this planet, has ever shown one tiny miny evidence, after or before Muller report???? Please share it. I might have missed that. Opinions, presumptions or personal interpretations of any context, might be considered for initiating an investigation, not to charge someone for a crime. insufficient and benefit of doubt, are the 2 widely use terms in the judicial procedures/final reports/judgement and always confuses people.

  • the whole investigation was biased! All Hillary people. that were against Trump! No collusion no crime! What is the crime?

  • Why isn't a Republican like Rudy Giuliani dropping a BAR Ethics Complaint against Mueller? Prosecutors are not meant to declare "We could not Prosecute but we feel the Target is Guilty". It is throwing shade on whoever they target and turns Innocent Until Proven Guilty on It's Head.

  • THERE IS "NO" LAW SAYING "A SITTING PRESIDENT CAN'T BE CHARGED.
    IT IS SIMPLY DOJ "POLICY." RUDY SHOULD KNOW THIS.

  • Lady Patriot 1776 says:

    We want answers to our questions … Mueller was paid Millions of dollars by Us (tax dollars at work.) it is our right for him to further explain his report…..

  • Sunny Smiles says:

    Democrats have so much invested in collusion. They can’t let it go. Americans DISTRUST our government because they gave displayed terrible behavior ad nauseum. Mueller has displayed terrible judgment. Not credible. Terrible waste of tax payer dollars. ANOTHER EXAMPLE OF FAKE NEWS.

  • Wendy Robson says:

    What is there left to say? Democrats have shot their wad! What will happen next is anyones' guess. If the Dems go ahead with impeachment……it will say more about their purpose in this government from day one. These people have gone off the rails. There aim is to divide and conquer.

  • File complaints against Mueller for insinuating the accused is GUILTY unless proven innocent….m isMeanwhile, Biden's son is given $1.5 billion by the Chinese. INVESTIGATE

  • I'm guessing the part where it says " A sitting president should not be indicted" don't sink in y'all mud brains right? SMH
    1. you can't bring charges if you can't indict a person. Charges = indictment (stupids)
    2. according to the DOJ memo since you shouldn't indict a sitting president, only Congress can do that through impeachment.
    3. Rudy needs to go back to law school, with all the BS he is saying
    4. Barr LIED that Muller wasn't following the DOJ memo
    5. Muller said he couldn't reach a conclusion on collision because during the investigations he couldn't get the true cause of all the lies from Trump and his people
    6. Let's not forget Russia is NOT OUR FRIEND and they tried to RUN our county through election meddling.

  • 🇺🇸💩"Mueller & Co.(u know them all/Democrats"💩🇺🇸"obstruction of justice" but first it was Collusion with Russia. No finding, just general statements, blanketing their hate. So, this is their blatant disregard for every American now and then ! for the Office of the Presidency🇺🇸they still 💀LOST💀🌎HUMA, Weiner, Hillary, Bill & Monica 😍and O'bAmA💩🌎💩sMh . .. ..a damnation !

  • This was a gross abuse of Legislative Authority & only adds to EV-IDenCE against these demoRAT$$$ obstructing our JUST/US SYSTEM for their own self serving financial and poliTICal gAIn$$$ TImE to bring in our MILITARY and take these TREASONous SnakeS out of our GARD=EN! lol I can't wait until DE/CE gets Sterilized from these SWAMP crEATureS$

  • Can't wait until Mueller testifies because the dumb GOP makes him and it backfires in their faces. lmao. He should insist he will only testify under oath on live TV. Just as Comey has always been more than willing to any time and he's done in the past but for some reason the GOP only wants "closed door" hearings. lmao

  • katherine harvey says:

    Make mueller testify. Ask him when he knew the dossier was fake. Did Trump tell you and your corrupt team to stop the gake investigation. Comey was blackmailing Trump over that bogus fake dossier

  • Andrew Paczuski says:

    Robert Mueller demands his role be fully exposed. Let him have his wish.
    Read the rest of his trip to Moscow story on Sept 21 2009. Dossier info is
    available on the web to everybody. Cody Shearer servitude to Clintons goes back
    some 30 years. In the final days of Mueller cabal it is most important to
    assure President Trump of our total support and return to our common goal to
    make America great. Hillary snared all the help she needed from FBI, Judicial
    Department and the rabid left wing of Democratic ready to send USA down the
    drain, rather than built up. The
    salacious dossier was put together by Sidney Blumenthal and Cody Shearer to
    please Hillary with their servitude, they hoped to be rewarded for after her
    win in 2016 elections. Trump threw a wrench into Hillary gearbox, so now
    Hillary with help of FBI and justice department launched the impeachment
    circus for Hillary to regain her hereditary throne as queen of progress and
    diversity. The dossier found its way (via John McCain) into the hands of Chris
    Steele of British M6 renown to wipe the footprints of Sidney and Cody to make
    it more difficult to trace it back to Hillary. Mueller presence on the tarmac
    of Moscow Scheremetyevo airport to deliver the enriched Uranium One sample to
    Putin on Sep 21 2009 makes it impossible to disentangle himself from Hillary.
    Nadler digging for Trump will find Mueller&Hillary in the stable full of
    Democratic horse manure. Uranium One made its way via land border from Russia
    to Iran and enriched to nuclear weapon grade U235 (or Plutonium when made
    ready), packed into warheads aimed at Tel-Aviv and the great Satan of infidel
    Merikka for the glory of religion of peace. Obama laundered planeloads of cash
    sent to Islamic Republic of Iran to finance purchase from North Korea plans and
    equipment to build Iran’s nuclear Plutonium breeder reactors. –All started with
    Mueller ‘innocent’ trip to Moscow 10 years ago Sept 21 2009 at Hillary
    orders

  • I have a hard time listening to the illegal hearings. I can't stomach it and it makes me so angry to hear democrats lying straight out of their mouths! God help us!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *