Dershowitz rips Mueller for his recent statement

Dershowitz rips Mueller for his recent statement


>>LET’S TALK ABOUT BOB MUELLER’S APPEARANCE MAGELLAN DERSHOWITZ, THE HARVARD LAW PROFESSOR WHO WROTE THE MUELLER REPORT, FINAL REPORT OF THE SPECIAL COUNSEL, THAT DONALD TRUMP, RUSSIA, LET ME ASK HOW THE MEDIA HAVE COVERED ROBERT MUELLER ESPECIALLY IN A TELEVISED APPEARANCE, AS AN UPSTANDING FIGURE TRYING TO GET TO THE TRUTH?>>THE MEDIA SUBSTITUTES WISHFUL THINKING BUT CAREFUL ANALYSIS. IF THERE HAD BEEN A MUELLER REPORT ABOUT HILLARY CLINTON OR DEMOCRAT AND MUELLER HAD DONE THE SAME THING HE DID HERE, IF THE INFORMATION HAD PROVED HE WAS TOTALLY INNOCENT WE WOULD HAVE SAID SO, MANY IN THE MEDIA WOULD HAVE ATTACKED THAT IS BEYOND THE SCOPE OF A PROSECUTOR. THE MEDIA DOES NOT PASS THE SHOE ON THE OTHER FOOT TEST. OF THE POLITICAL PARTIES WERE REVERSED THE MEDIA WOULD NOT BE CONSISTENT. IT WOULD ALWAYS ACCEPT ITS IDEOLOGY OVERREPORTING AND I THINK PARTICULARLY PUNDITS. THE REASON SO MANY PUNDITS HAVE BEEN WRONG IN PREDICTING THINGS IN THE REASON I HAVE BEEN RIGHT IN PREDICTING ALMOST EVERYTHING IS NOT THAT I’M ANY SMARTER BUT I DON’T SUBSTITUTE WISHFUL THINKING FOR CAREFUL LEGAL ANALYSIS.>>YOU SAY UNTIL HIS TELEVISED APPEARANCE YOU WERE DEFENDING BOB MUELLER AS NOT BEING A PARTISAN WHO FAVORED ONE SIDE OVER THE OTHER. DID YOU GET A LOT OF GRIEF FROM YOUR LIBERAL FRIENDS?>>OF COURSE I DID. ON BOTH SIDES. I GET GRIEF FROM BOTH SIDES BECAUSE I DON’T SATISFY EITHER SIDE BY MY HOPEFULLY NEUTRAL ANALYSIS BUT I HAVE NEVER THOUGHT HE WAS A PARTISAN BUT WHEN HE MADE THAT STATEMENT HE NOT ONLY PUT HIS THUMB, HE PUT HIS ELBOW ON THE SCALE. IT WAS CLEARLY INTENDED TO ENCOURAGE IMPEACHMENT BY THE HOUSE. IT IS NOT THE PROPER OBJECT OF A SPECIAL COUNSEL TO DO THE INVESTIGATION FOR CONGRESS. THAT VIOLATES THE SEPARATION OF POWERS. IT IS CONGRESS THAT HAS TO DO ITS OWN INVESTIGATION AND HAS TO TAKE POLITICAL RESPONSIBILITY FOR DOING IT. WHEN THEY SHUT THAT OFF TO SPECIAL COUNSEL, SPECIAL COUNSEL TAKE THE RESPONSIBILITY IT DESTROYS THE SYSTEM OF CHECKS AND BALANCES.>>IF MUELLER WAS TRYING TO ENCOURAGE PRO-IMPEACHMENT DEMOCRATS HE WASN’T EXACTLY EXPLICIT ABOUT IT WHEN HE VOTED THE CONSTITUTION AND SAYING ANOTHER REMEDY FOR THIS, THE COMMITTAL JUSTICE SYSTEM, HE WAS COURTING A DOJ MEMO ABOUT INCITING A SITTING PRESIDENT. WHAT MAKES YOU SO SURE? HE IS URGING CONGRESS TO IMPEACH. I DIDN’T HEAR THOSE WORDS.>>YOU DIDN’T HEAR THOSE WORDS BUT THE MUSIC WAS QUITE CLEAR. HE LEARNED NOTHING NEW DURING THE REPORT ABOUT THE JUSTICE DEPARTMENT OR CONSTITUTION WAS ON DAY ONE HE KNEW HE COULD NOT INDICT A SITTING PRESIDENT UNDER JUSTICE DEPARTMENT REGULATIONS AND THE QUESTION COMES UP WHY DID WE HAVE A SPECIAL COUNSEL AT ALL? WHY DIDN’T WE HAVE A NONPARTISAN INDEPENDENT EXPERT COMMISSION LOOKING INTO RUSSIAN EXPERTS — EFFORTS TO INFLUENCE THE ELECTION WHICH ARE CONTINUING IN THE 2020 ELECTION? THAT WOULD BE THE WAY TO GO IN LIGHT OF THE FACT THAT WE NOW KNOW THE JUSTICE DEPARTMENT AND MUELLER CONCLUDED THE RESULT OF THE SPECIAL COUNSEL COULD NOT BE THE INDICTMENT OF THE PRESIDENT.>>PART OF THE REASON WAS A NONPARTISAN COMMISSION CAME AND PEOPLE LIKE PAUL MANAFORT AND FLYNN.>>WHAT BENEFIT CAME FROM INDICTING THE RUSSIANS? THE RUSSIANS CAN’T BE CHARGED. MANAFORT WAS INDICTED FOR SOMETHING UNRELATED AS THE JUDGE SAID, THE PROSECUTOR WASN’T INTERESTED, OR WERE INTERESTED IN SQUEEZING HIM TO MAKE HIM SING, COMPOSED AGAINST DONALD TRUMP. WHAT WAS THE PURPOSE OF THAT? I THINK IT WAS A FUTILE EFFORT IT WOULD HAVE BEEN BETTER TO HAVE NONPARTISAN INVESTIGATION BUT TAKE WE HAD AFTER 9/11. OF THE NONPARTISAN INVESTIGATION HAD EVIDENCE OF CRIMES THAT COULD BE TURNED OVER TO ORDINARY PROSECUTORS.>>YOU SAY PROSECUTORS ARE NOT SUPPOSED TO TRASH PEOPLE. YOU DON’T INVITE AS JIM COMEY SAID IN A NEWS CONFERENCE, PERSON DID TERRIBLE THINGS. MUELLER TESTIFIED AS AN INDEPENDENT COUNSEL, WAS SUPPOSED TO WRITE A REPORT TO THE ATTORNEY GENERAL, AS HE LAYS OUT THE FACTS OF HIS JOB.>>HIS JOB WAS TO FILE A REPORT WITH THE ATTORNEY GENERAL. NOTHING IN THE RULES SAY NEGATIVE AND CRITICAL MATERIAL THAT INNOCENT PEOPLE SHOULD BE RELEASED TO THE PUBLIC. I SUSPECT WE HAVE SEEN THE LAST SPECIAL COUNSEL. I THINK MY HOPE CONGRESS WILL HAVE HEARINGS TO TRY TO DETERMINE WHETHER THE SPECIAL COUNSEL SHOULD BE TRASHED THE WAY THE SPECIAL PROSECUTOR WAS. WE HAVE SEEN THE DEATHKNELL OF SPECIAL PROSECUTORS, SPECIAL COUNSEL AND I HOPE THE MUELLER REPORT IS THE LAST SPECIAL COUNSEL REPORT WE HAVE. IT IS INCONSISTENT WITH THE ROLE OF PROSECUTORS, INCONSISTENT WITH PRESUMPTION OF INNOCENCE AND INCONSISTENT WITH THE CONSTITUTIONAL SYSTEM OF SEPARATION OF POWERS.>>IT RAISES THE QUESTION HOW IT ADMINISTRATION WOULD INVESTIGATE ITSELF. SHAME ON MUELLER FOR USING HIS POSITION OF TRUST AGAINST FORMER FBI DIRECTOR. WOULD YOU SAID DONALD TRUMP HAS GONE TOO FAR IN PERSONAL ATTACKS ON MUELLER, WHICH HUNTED HOAX AND ALL THAT?>>WHEN A PERSON IS THE SUBJECT OF AN INVESTIGATION HE OR SHE HAS THE RIGHT TO FIGHT BACK. WHAT I HAVE CHOSEN DIFFERENT WORDS? OF COURSE. THAT IS THE PRESIDENT’S STYLE BUT THERE’S AN ENORMOUS DIFFERENCE BETWEEN THOSE CONDUCTING AN INVESTIGATION AND THOSE WHO ARE SUBJECT OF THE INVESTIGATION. PEOPLE CHOOSE, SOME CHOOSE TO IGNORE. SOME CHOOSE TO FIGHT BACK. I DIDN’T VOTE FOR DONALD TRUMP BUT PEOPLE WHO DID UNDERSTOOD THEY WERE GETTING A MAN WHO WAS ALWAYS GOING TO FIGHT BACK AND NEVER GOING TO SIT BACK AND SAY I ACCEPT THIS, LET THE PROCESS GO FORWARD.>>JUDGE ANDREW NAPOLITANO TAKES A DIFFERENT VIEW. WE COULD NOT SAY HE DID NOT COMMIT A CRIME. FILL IN THE BLANK, BECAUSE WE BELIEVE HE DID. DO YOU DISAGREE WITH THAT ANALYSIS?>>I FUNDAMENTALLY DISAGREE. I LIKE A JUDGE NAPOLITANO BUT I WANT TO CHALLENGE HIM TO A DEBATE. I WANT FOX TO SHOW BOTH SIDES OF THE ISSUE UNLIKE THE OTHER MEDIA. PLEASE AGREE TO DEVIATE ME ON FOX OR ANYWHERE ELSE AND LET’S HAVE IT OUT. THAT THE AMERICAN PUBLIC DECIDE WHO IS CORRECT, YOU OR ME. THESE ARE REASONABLE DISAGREEMENTS, AND IMPORTANT ONES.

Author:

100 thoughts on “Dershowitz rips Mueller for his recent statement”

  • Michael Pham says:

    Dershowitz diminishes his own reputation and is doing a disservice to the public in this interview. What a hack. 🤥

  • Truth Rainer says:

    NO COLLUSION PERIOD. FOUND NONE. THE DEMS ARE JUST MESSING WITH THE AMERICAM PEOPLE AND D THEIR MINDS IS ALL.

  • Raymon Summers says:

    If only the rest of the Democratic leaders would listen to this man…. We the people are TIRED of this political football! Keep draining the swamp Mr. President. It's alot worse than I thought.

  • Pedro Chevez says:

    If you're not guilty, then you're automatically innocent. If there's an ongoing investigation on a crime that HAD occured, then you're innocent until proven guilty. The left/democrats wants to have many brain-dead sheep forget that basic common sense fact. What Mueller is unconstitutionally doing here is saying Trump is always presumed guilty until any and all crimes they come up with end up going nowhere. This is beyond sickening and beyond unconstitutional. At this rate and using that logic anyone can say that any person is guilty of anything and label that person as guilty, especially if said person gets angrily defensive about their innocence.

  • New Home Sales with Full Spectrum says:

    So Mr. Dershowitz, how do you explain the almost 1000 non partisan attorneys and judges who's read the report and feel trump should in fact be impeached? You seem to be in a VERY small minority of legal professionals with your view. I believe based on those numbers, a debate would simply be for your own personal ego

  • Keith E. Bilitsky says:

    President Trump fights back because he's got balls. Been a long time since we've had a president with balls !!!!!!

  • Joseph A Lawrence says:

    Alan derschiwitz is a legal genius but I disagree with his personal beliefs on world views. Comey would do well to hire Alan derschiwitz if he is ever indicted.

  • THE DON’T CARE ABOUT SEPARATION OF POWERS; THE Y, IN MY OPINION, DONOT EVEN LIKE OUR CONSTITUTION OR BILL OF RIGHTS👎👎👎👎🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸

  • Leonardo Espino says:

    Yeah, I want to see this debate poll: all those in favor of the debate like comment, those who don’t want to see the debate comment no

  • Thank You Prof. Dershowitz , You walk Your talk … I dont understand how You can sort thru this bs while the Dems are so disinterested in how the process works but instead have a laser focus perspective on Impeachment … Nothing is getting done because of all the rhetoric and I mean Not a Goddamn thing !
    …The Dems have almost Thirty Elected Officials ignoring their duties and stuffing cash in their slush funds and Biden is The Only Candidate with a shot …
    Amy Klobuchar is doing Nothing gor the State of Minnesota or the Nation … Disgusting corrupt behavior and She talks about honorable Public Servants , what a farce … Take away the Cash and these Rats wouldbe scurrying for the rock that they crawled from beneath … America needs to shut its borders and Open its eyes

  • Formerly respectable and well-known lawyers now licking the boots of a Fascist and spouting nonsense — all to try to stay "newsworthy" while destroying whatever reputation they once had:

    1. Rudy
    2. Dershowitz

    Pathetic.

  • Marie Saqueton says:

    Wait for Devin Nunes' report that he found hidden by the Mueller report which will make Mueller and his team guilty of being biased and still demonizing our Pres. even without any evidence found. His team all Hillary supporters, what can we expect?

  • leanard flow says:

    Mueller showed his true colors, Mueller couldn't find anything on our elected President because there wasn't anything to find. Mueller was running a witch hunt and is a big COWARD. I WONDER HOW MANY VICTIMS MUELLER HAS LEFT IN HIS CRIMINAL WAKE OF UNJUST RULINGS, MUELLER IS A MONSTER OF THE DEEP STATE THAT FAILED BECAUSE HE STUMBLED OVER HIS OWN FEET IN THE DARK WERE MUELLER LURKS AROUND FOR VICTIMS. REMEMBER YOU DEEP STATE COWARD MUELLER, (IN GOD WE TRUST.).

  • From his lofty Harvard tenure, Alan Dershowitz is playing the conservative winner in his support of Trump. That wasn't the case during his "Israel First" liberal lobbying days with AIPAC, nor his trashing the career of Professor (and patriot) Norman Finklestein upon losing their debate on "Democracy Now". Not exactly a record Alan should be proud of.

  • American Male says:

    Alan VS Da Liberal Implant judge to Fox News? Love the idea and starting to respect Alan alot ! Bring it on judge If You Have The Balls !

  • Dershowitz was one of the ones recommending a second special council, so it could stall the American people for another two and a half years. Go figure.

  • "We'll get rid of the Special Council, who replaced the banned Special Prosecutor, but then five years from now, we'll appoint a Special Special Council."

  • Then get rid of the DOJ guidelines so the the president can be charged and is not above the law. What a system! You can commit crimes to get elected and then there is nothing the justice department can do. Rife for more cheating.

  • Truthisstrangerthan Fiction says:

    Maybe Dershowitz will wake up when more information comes out about the way the Mueller report failed to include exculpatory evidence…another example in a long, long list of lies by omission, whether it be by the phoney Mueller investigation or the media.

    I still don’t see Dershowitz as a neutral commentator. But, he is correct that it is not a prosecutor’s job to prove innocence. Mueller would have spent zero effort in trying to do so. His job was to determine if there was sufficient evidence of a crime to indict. There wasn’t. In fact there was no evidence of a crime as far as collusion was concerned….except that of Hillary and the Deep State, which Mueller completely ignored.
    Thus Mueller told the press that he found no evidence of something that was not in his job description and something he didn’t look for….a testament to his corruption and the Deep State’s low opinion of the public intellect.

  • Chester Smith says:

    Dershowitz has defended more notorious guilty men than any other working attorney, including murderer OJ, murderer Bulow, and, now the guiltiest of all–Donald Trump, responsible for separating children from their mothers, just one of the grotesque actions Mr. Dershowitz dismisses. Shame, Profeesor, ex-Harvard; expensive defender of the guilty.

  • Woochinatchika Kokillibolinov says:

    We could not prosecute crimes for which we had no evidence === The sky is blue
    Mueller's comment was fundamentally irrelevant and fundamentally specious… Not the kind of schoolgirl gossip style I'd expect from someone charged with the solemn duty of conducting an investigation for our DOJ.

  • On the topic of Finklestein, one obvious casualty of Trump's global chessboard has been the Palestinians, who formerly had the ear of UN and US representatives. Massacres and atrocities of past years by Israelis (the occupying nation) were rightly condemned as unlawful. Through DJTs considerable pro-Israeli influence that is gone now, and severe hardship is back upon them. There is little influence felt by Israel any more from negative world opinion.

  • But Allan, you voted for Clinton. So it's cool that you get it now. But if you were smart and they were too, you would have gotten long ago. Now it is just easy to see. It is wide open in your face lying and corruption. Only people who don't care about truth but care only about what they want or they are so hateful they will not see it.

  • William Bingham says:

    What drives me crazy is the fact that Mueller says we couldn't prove Trump didn't commit a crime, but he never says he did commit a crime either, he throws out someones opinion on his staff that a crime may have been committed, that opinion isn't based on a law or a violation of a law, instead it's based on what someone (Wiener), thinks it should be or could be, based on what he thinks Trump was thinking, not on actual evidence, even though there was no crime to obstruct. Would like to know if it is a crime to falsify a report to the DOJ and intentionally leave out information that would vacate any wrong doing, in other words Lie by omission.

  • Trump Broke the law, simple as that. If you don't believe me….Take anything the Trump Report said…..and replace Trump with Obama and see how you feel. Hell you have dipshits still going on about Uranium 1….which wasn't illegal or a story in the first place.

  • Mom come quick you gotta see this!
    Dershowitz is dissing Mueller on FOX
    He's spanking Mueller like a 4 year old at Walmart.

  • Facts Matter says:

    no one cares what doucheawitz the alleged pedophile has to say especially when it's when it's on state Fox news, the Russian influenced propaganda arm of the White House.

  • Dershowitz rips Mueller for sticking to DOJ rules while AG Barr goes on a Conspiracy Theory talk show junket parroting Trump talking points. Gotcha!

  • Trusted Source says:

    What we have learned is those people who have been in charge of Federal agencies got there though bureaucracy, people who don't rock the people, people of relatively low IQ compared to their job but are compliant to the powers that be.

  • @AlanDersh has been consistent and really non-partisan in his legal analysis from the beginning. It does take courage–he does get shots from both sides–especially because what he says rings true.

  • Let me see hmmmmmm Dershowitz did not serve in the Vietnam war, and this is the only war he protested. Mueller did serve in the US Marines winning a Bronze Star and Purple Heart.

  • Israel with AIPAC has more influence in our elections and politicians then any other foreign nation.😡😡😡

  • Henry Wilson says:

    Democrats substitute Wishful Thinking for reality at every opportunity when presented with an opportunity for self destruction and humiliation.

  • I would like to see a debate between Judge Napolitano and Prof. Dershowitz regarding the above subject. The debate certainly would be respectful, professional and exquisitely informative. So much so that any lawyer viewing it should be able to receive continuing legal education (CLE) credits. The question is: who would be the best moderator?

  • mueller repeated what was in the report and that he felt barr misrepresented it. obviously none of you have read it!

  • Sheesh…how can you have a genocidal liar, plagiarist, and OJ Simpson Defense lawyer on your show? He literally turns my stomach!

  • I need Dershowitz to tell Horowitz to put his car in gear……go Horoshow go! Hold Director Wray in contempt…he is just as corrupt as Comey. Mueller became a delusional Dem just like Wiesman, Schiff, Nadler, Schumer and Pelosi.

  • Tom Alawatte says:

    Prof. Alan is a true libertarian. He is a no joke guy. Judge Nap is just another Trump hating judge, he was against Trump from day one. Even a blind man can see his democrat political bias in his legal analyses.

  • nosuchthing8 says:

    Well of course they need to wheel out dershowitz to help make their drones ignore the obvious truth, Trump obstucted justice.

  • nosuchthing8 says:

    If Trump didnt want to do the time, why did he commit the.crime? He didnt have to obstruct justice any more than a car thief has to steal a car.

  • nosuchthing8 says:

    If Mueller had found Trump had murdered 10 people, dershowitz would be furious at mueller for doing his job. Sad.

  • I would purchase that debate on pay-per-view. I cant stand that crappy nappy, hes wrong 80% of the time and is so arrogant at the same time.

  • Carol Kaiser.Pleake says:

    The Dersh is a testimony to the deaf, dumb, blind libs. Take lessons from The Dersh in the common senses section. Do any of the libs know how to learn?

  • Dershowitz .. " I was not on Epstein's plane , well maybe a few times, but I definitely didn't get massages from underage girls , well maybe a few times , but I didn't see Mr Drumpf there … well maybe a few times … " such a shining light of truth and integrity , a perfect fit for Mur-dokk and his faux noise …

  • Flummoxed Marmoset says:

    Dershowitz is talking about everything – except what Trump has actually done, THAT IS CLEARLY CRIMINAL. He has been a hopeless conservative lackey for years, though he does not sell himself that way. This segment is no different……..

  • Cate Ellington says:

    Dershowitz continues to torch any remaining credibility he may have with anyone outside Fox Bubble. Mueller’s press conference included NOTHING that was not ALREADY in his Report. Dershowitz knows this. He’s just pissed because Mueller verbalized to Americans too lazy to read what was in Report and that gets in the way of Trump’s, Barr’s & Dershowitz’ LIES they’re telling America ABOUT the Mueller Report. Sleazy Dershowitz

  • No. Muller didn't sink Racist Chump, Donald Treason Chump sunk himself a long time ago. The only reason he keeps his nose barely above water its because of the rich people above him that are benefiting from his Racist ignorance and they just keep moving him as their puppet till they no longer have use for him.

  • No. Muller didn't sink Racist Chump, Donald Treason Chump sunk himself a long time ago. The only reason he keeps his nose barely above water its because of the rich people above him that are benefiting from his Racist ignorance and they just keep moving him as their puppet till they no longer have use for him.

  • No. Muller didn't sink Racist Chump, Donald Treason Chump sunk himself a long time ago. The only reason he keeps his nose barely above water its because of the rich people above him that are benefiting from his Racist ignorance and they just keep moving him as their puppet till they no longer have use for him.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *