Barr says Mueller ‘could’ve reached a decision’ if he wanted to

Barr says Mueller ‘could’ve reached a decision’ if he wanted to


HALF-BROTHER. SHOCKING STORY, I APPRECIATE YOU.>>THANKS. ♪ ♪>>Ed: ANOTHER FOX NEWS ALERT. SEVERAL DOZEN HOUSE DEMOCRATS HAVE NOW JOINED THE PUSH FOR IMPEACHING PRESIDENT TRUMP. THE ATTORNEY GENERAL WILLIAM BARR IS PUSHING BACK TONIGHT ON SPECIAL COUNSEL ROBERT MUELLER AFTER HE APPEARED TO CONTRADICT SOME OF BARR’S SUMMARY OF THE RUSSIAN INVESTIGATION. WATCH.>>HE COULD HAVE REACHED A CONCLUSION, THE OPINION SAYS YOU CAN’T INDICT A PRESIDENT WHILE HE’S IN OFFICE, BUT HE COULD HAVE REACHED A DECISION AS TO WHETHER IT WAS CRIMINAL ACTIVIT ACTIVITY. BUT HE HAD HIS REASONS FOR NOT DOING IT, WHICH HE EXPLAINED. I’M NOT GOING TO ARGUE ABOUT THOSE REASONS, BUT WHEN HE DID NOT MAKE A DECISION, THE DEPUTY ATTORNEY GENERAL, ROD ROSENSTEIN AND I FELT IT WAS NECESSARY FOR US AS THE HEADS OF THE DEPARTMENT TO REACH THAT DECISION.>>Ed: IT’S ALL HEATING UP. THE FORMER DEPUTY ASSISTANT GENERAL HARRY LITMAN AND FORMER CIA ANALYST BUCK SEXTON. WELCOME TO BOTH OF YOU.>>GOOD TO SEE SEE YOU.>>Ed: BUCK, THE LATEST COUNT IS 51 HOUSE DEMOCRATS, BREAKING TONIGHT, IT HAS REACHED THAT NUMBER, NOW SAYING THAT TO SPEAKER NANCY PELOSI, WE WANT TO SEE IMPEACHMENT PROCEEDINGS MOVE FORWARD. AT A TIME WHEN THE PRESIDENT TODAY SAID IMPEACHMENT IS A “DIRTY, FILTHY, DISGUSTING WORD.” WHERE ARE WE TONIGHT? SPEAK OF THIS IS EXACTLY WHAT I THINK THE PURPOSE OF THE MUELLER PRESS CONFERENCE WAS. IT IS QUITE OBVIOUS THAT IT WAS TO REVIVE THE ISSUE AND PUT A LITTLE BIT MORE WIND IN THE SALES OF THE PRO-IMPEACHMENT CROWD ON CAPITOL HILL. I ALSO THINK THE DEMOCRATS ALL ALONG HAVE BEEN LOOKING FOR THE OPPORTUNITY DESPITE ALL THE HEMMING AND HAWING ABOUT HOW TRUMP HAS BEEN SO UNETHICAL AND TERRIBLE. THEY ARE NOT SURE THEY HAVE ENOUGH TO IMPEACH HIM YET. IF IT WERE THAT DAY OR A THREAT TO THE COUNTRY INTO OUR INSTITUTIONS, YOU WOULD THINK TE INSTITUTIONS, YOU WOULD THINK TY WOULD ALREADY KNOW THAT AND THEY WOULD NOT BE MAKING OBVIOUS POLITICAL CALCULATIONS WHETHER THEY SHOULD DO THIS. I THINK MUELLER MIGHT HAVE DONE TRUMP A FAVOR BECAUSE ANYONE WHO WAS ON THE FENCE BEFORE ABOUT WHETHER MUELLER WAS ACTING LIKE A PARTISAN IN THIS PROCESS, I THINK THAT HAS BEEN PUT TO REST. HE SAID THE REPORT SPEAKS FOR ITSELF. THEN WHY IS MUELLER SPEAKING TO ABOUT SIX WEEKS AFTER THE REPORT CAME OUT TO TELL US THINGS WE DIDN’T NEED TO BE TOLD? HE SAID THAT THEY COULD NOT PROVE HE WAS INNOCENT, TURNING CENTURIES OF AMERICAN JURISPRUDENCE ON ITS HEAD. THAT IS NOT HOW IT IS SUPPOSED TO GO. YOU HAVE A PRESUMPTION OF INNOCENCE. THE MOST IMPORTANT POINT HERE BEING THAT BARR SAID HE COULD HAVE MADE THE CALL AND SHOULD HAVE MADE THE CALL. HE DID NOT DO THAT AS A TACTIC TO TURN THIS OVER TO CONGRESS FOR IMPEACHMENT, THAT IS EXACTLY WHAT HE WANTED, THAT IS WHAT HE’S GOING TO GET.>>Ed: LET’S GET HARRY, TO BUCK’S POINT, AT THE PEACE IN “THE NEW YORK POST” SAYING, AMONG OTHER THINGS, THIS WAS A DISGRACEFUL MASS BY ROBERT MUELLER. THE I COULD NOT EXONERATE HIM POINT IS DISCOMFORTING FOR ANOTHER REASON, WHICH IS SINCE WHEN DO PROSECUTORS EXONERATING PEOPLE PRAY THAT IS NOT A PROSECUTOR STRAW. MAYBE IN THE AFTERMATH OF A WRONGFUL CONVICTION WITH IRREFUTABLE PHYSICAL EVIDENCE, PROSECUTORS WILL SAY SOMETHING INCULPATORY BUT EVEN IN MOST OF THESE CASES, THEY USUALLY DROP CHARGES ON GROUNDS OF INSUFFICIENT EVIDENCE, NOT POSITIVE PROOF OF INNOCENCE. WHAT SAY YOU, SIR?>>ACTUALLY, THAT IS DEAD WRONG. BUCK IS DEAD WRONG. THEY DO IT EVERY DAY. BUT THEY DON’T NECESSARILY DO IS PUBLICIZE IT. BUT BARR DECIDED, I THINK WITH GOOD REASON, TO PUBLICIZE IT. BUT WE HAD AN INQUIRY WHERE JUSTICE DEPARTMENT RULES AND THEIR CONSTITUTIONAL INTERPRETATION LEFT AND ACTUAL JUDGMENT OF GUILT OFF THE TABLE. SO ALL THAT WAS LEFT TO SAY IS, WELL, WE COULDN’T EXONERATE. IF YOU LOOK CAREFULLY, INCLUDING AT THE REPORT, IT IS PRETTY CLEAR THAT THE CONDUCT THAT MUELLER HAS FOUND IS OBSTRUCTION ANY DAY OF THE WEEK, ANY COURT IN THE LAND, AND ANY OTHER PERSON, EXCEPT THAT PRESIDENT. FINALLY, THIS BROADSIDE AGAINST MUELLER’S INTEGRITY IS OUT OF FANTASYLAND. NOBODY WHO KNOWS MUELLER AND WASHINGTON OF ANY PARTY — HE IS A LIFELONG REPUBLICAN — CREDITS THE NOTION THAT HE SOMEHOW IS A PARTISAN.>>Ed: A LOT OF REPUBLICANS THAT DON’T LIKE PRESIDENT TRUMP. THIS NOTION THAT EXONERATION IS THE STANDARD, THAT WOULD BE NEWS TO THE THREE OTHER FORMER DOJ OFFICIALS I’VE SPOKEN TO IN THE LAST 24 HOURS WHO ALL SAY THAT THIS IS NOVEL AT BEST AND UNETHICAL I THINK IS A MUCH MORE APT DESCRIPTION FOR IT.>>100% WRONG.>>Ed: YOU CAN SLEEP SAYING WRONG BUT YOUR EXPLANATION FOR WHY IT IS WRONG –>>I WOULD JUST SAY THAT LAMING OBSTRUCTION IS SO OBVIOUS, IF IT IS SO OBVIOUS, THEN WHY DIDN’T MUELLER SAY HE BROKE THE LAW? THE REASON IS BECAUSE IF HE HAD PICKED ONE OF THE TEN POSSIBLE COUNTS ARE ONE OF THE TEN POSSIBLE INSTANCES I SHOULD SAY, THEN PEOPLE COULD REPUDIATE IT AND SAY THAT IS A STRETCH. THEY DOJ WOULD HAVE A FIGHT OVER IT. HE DID NOT WANT THAT TO BE ADJUDICATED. HE WANTED TO GO TO TO CONGRESS BECAUSE IT’S POLITICAL. IT’S OBVIOUS TO EVERYONE ELSE.>>Ed: GO AHEAD GIVE IT TO HARRY.>>TWO QUICK POINTS. I DON’T THINK YOU READ THE REPORT –>>TWICE, WITH NOTES.>>VOLUME TWO, IT WILL TELL YOU IN CHAPTER AND VERSE. THE REASONS, IRONICALLY, BENDING OVER BACKWARDS TO BE FAIR TO TRUMP. I AGREE –>>EVERYONE WANTED TO BE FAIR TO TRUMP. THAT IS A FANTASY.>>Ed: LET HARRY FINISH HIS POINT.>>HE SPECIFICALLY SAID HE COULD HAVE GONE THE OTHER WAY AND SAID I AGREE. IN REASONS OF FAIRNESS, HE DID NOT GO THERE. YET HE LEFT NO DOUBT. IF YOU ACTUALLY READ AND LOOK AT, JUST SEASON PROSECUTORS, NONPARTISANS, IT IS AN OVERWHELMING CASE.>>Ed: THE PRESIDENT CERTAINLY

Author:

100 thoughts on “Barr says Mueller ‘could’ve reached a decision’ if he wanted to”

  • Christina Pansy says:

    An Old West analogy (when stealing a horse was a hanging crime):

    "We could not find any evidence that Mr. Trump stole any horses, bu he is obviously guilty of resisting to be hung for it."

  • Angel of War I am says:

    that’s right .. mueller best decision is stay neutral !!

    the never trump a** holez will tear him apart like hungry 😋 Puranas !!

  • midnighfairy says:

    Mueller don't have nothing on the President . the second volume of his report is just an attempt to smear the President. 250 pages of innuendos and suggestions.. that press conference was staged for the media and for Mueller to just throw red meat to congress.

  • Gavin Coleman says:

    Barr you reached a decision you got down on your kneess gladly wrapped your lips around your masters toadstool and sucked gleefully .

  • The "Constituents" OF the REPROBATE DEMONCRAPRATS ARE HAPPY WITH WHO THEY ELECTED!! I haven't SEEN YET ANYTHING ABOUT A RECALL! The DemoncrapRATS ARE MAKING THEIR CON-STITUENTS HAPPY!! AND!!! As Senator Graham SAID!!! "They will not stop UNTIL they GET WHAT THEY WANT! I wonder IF Senator Graham REALIZED what he said? NOBODY ELSE SEEMS TO HEAR & SEE WHAT HE SAID!!

  • Anyone here even read the Mueller Report? HA! One Republican congressman Justin Amash did and concluded Drumpf should be Impeached. Read his twits and view his townhall videos while READING the Mueller Report, then get back to me with your informed views! HA!

  • O.k.. Lets be a clear thinker and cast some clarity on what Barr really said to us pleabs. "These FBI agents who committed crimes against the state are gonna get a pass, they were confused about their real duty to uphold the law." But don't you folks try this at home cause it's considered treasonous.

  • peter collins says:

    Note to AG Barr: Mueller did reach a conclusion and he made it clear — Trump committed at least 10 culpable acts of obstruction of justice, and the Congress should do its duty and try trump for those crimes.
    If you read the Mueller report, Volume 2 makes it crystal clear that that was Mueller's decision. And if you read the report, it will be your decision too. It's irrefutable.

  • Here is the way justice works: The question is "Guilty or Not Guilty".
    The question is not "Guilty or Innocent"

  • Stone Harper says:

    You can tell how few of the people in this comment section actually read the report. They will just believe anything Trump tells them, it’s these people who are ruining our country

  • Buck was dead on. No charge of obstruction but he could've charged Trump if he wanted to?!!
    We NEED Mueller to be called before Congress to answer more questions about his corruption of this process.

    Lindsey Graham needs to call him before the Senate Judiciary committee.

  • MrBrachiatingApe says:

    Sorry, so the Assistant Heads are now the Heads of the Department…?

    What in the holy hell…the fact that so many of the Executive Branch bureaucrats are actively disobeying and resisting the sole repository of the people's sovereign power IN the Executive Branch proves that those bloated Federal employees are putting feelings, party and malice above country, law, duty and morality.

  • He did reach a decision. He decided that if a sitting president couldn't be indicted then he would attempt to exonerate the president. He was unable to do so. Barr knows this. He also knows that you DON'T know this, and don't want to know this. So he tells you the lies that you want to hear and you lick it up like mother's milk. This is the most transparently corrupt administration of all time and the average Fox viewer is complicit in their crimes. Your willful ignorance is treason.

  • It's amazing how people who are intelligent like Harry can make absolute stupid comments that even laymen such as myself can decipher as false. There was no obstruction and it is a stupid and tiresome comment I'm sick of this.

  • May-July Money says:

    I am LOVIN' Attorney General William Barr!!!! He has integrity! It's refreshing to see that paired with a brilliant mind.

  • Words of wisdom from a Trump lackey who has yet to explain his total misrepresentation of the facts in the Mueller report.

  • soul_brother says:

    Hillary's corruption was blatantly in your face in public. And she was not even put in front of a court. Lol

  • Virginia Andre says:

    Mueller did reach a conclusion , but it wasn't the one Democrats wanted to hear , so he threw them a bone, because he hated Trump for firing his buddy Comey, they used to work in the Aerospace business and would award each other very lucrative contracts, he is just pandering to the Democrats , everyone and their granny knows he's got nothing and Trump committed NO crimes.

  • Sparky Runner says:

    Are you saying that the parting Statement from Robert Mueller was not seen
    nore written by someone else ????

  • The Dems are salivating while looking with blinkers on. They are only re-electing Pres Trump. Nothing they have done for decades has helped our nation or mankind. The Pres has done more in 3 years for us and our nation, and all the while under constant attack, than the whole Dem Party and the entire lefts power hoarders.

  • Chubby Barney Barr just couldn't resist, eternity he thought is such a
    long time, aiding and abetting is yes a crime but Mueller is getting all of
    the shine, so why not go with the cesspool blind to see what I
    will find, and so the weak hallow man grasped his last ride.

  • Chubby Barney Barr just couldn't resist, eternity he thought is such a
    long time, aiding and abetting is yes a crime but Mueller is getting all of
    the shine, so why not go with the cesspool blind to see what I
    will find, and so the weak hallow man grasped his last ride.

  • Chubby Barney Barr just couldn't resist, eternity he thought is such a
    long time, aiding and abetting is yes a crime but Mueller is getting all of
    the shine, so why not go with the cesspool blind to see what I
    will find, and so the weak hallow man grasped his last ride.

  • Jodene Polston says:

    HILLARY OBSTRUCTED So Bigly. After supeaned evidence got bleach butted and smashed and 33000 emails disappear yet she was not even charged with Obstruction.
    TRUMP has done NOTHING CLOSE TO WHAT HILLARY HAS DONE. TRUMP IS WIDE OPEN. HOW CAN RHEY POSSIBLY GET AWAY WITH THESE CRIMES WHEN ANY OTHER AMERICAN WOULD HAVE BEEN CHARGED AND INPRISONED.
    EQUAL JUSTICE FOR ALL!!

  • he did that purposely
    him in all the other crony lawyers were hand picked by the democrats
    we can't find anything so let's just lie

  • ironduke0775 says:

    Do you remember when Ken Starr said that he couldn’t reach a determination about Bill Clinton’s guilt because you couldn’t indict a sitting president?

    Neither do I…. 🤡🌎

  • The problem with these interviews is objectivity is ALWAYS lacking by someone. The simple issue that folk like dude on the left don't want to address is, if Mueller believed Trump did something untoward in the area of obstruction, he could have said so. This is some bulls–t and these people need to stop playing.

  • Michigan Prospector says:

    Harry Litman is quite a snake. You can tell he is quite comfortable telling lies (as many attorneys are).

  • 13 Dem lawyers, and a man who didn't get the job from Trump, the day prior. And, obstruction of Justice, on an investigation, they knew was a sham, seems to be a bs, trumped-up charge. And, I sure as hell don't want Pence, or Pelosi as our Presidente!! Both, DS players, and we will lose our Constitutional Republic, for a Socialist Communist rule, with Pelosi, HRC, Barry and the UN at the helm. God help us all!!!

  • Christian Gomez says:

    Anyone notice how demonrats All have weirdo looks as people!??! They look think and talk weird. Their common sense and talking points All seem CORRUPT and so on!

    Compare POTUS DJT PEOPLE, non stop Common sense.

  • Alicia Davis says:

    The left better understand if they even try to impeach the President there will be a war and THE LEFT WILL LOSE!

  • Alicia Davis says:

    This impeaching nonsense is another desperate attempt by the left to keep away from the fact that there’s already plenty of evidence that’s public that shows
    The TREASONOUS crimes committed by
    Obama the Clinton’s and their minions at the senior levels of the CIA FBI ETC

    the left is desperate because the President is allowing ALL the evidence to be made public and Un Redacted!

    The corrupt left is done and they know it

    If ( the ones that haven’t already committed crimes). Dems in Congress and the senate want to throw their hats into the corrupt ring fine they will be prosecuted along with the rest of the dirtbag leftists.

  • Samuel Waddell says:

    Mueller was bias; all the Democrat lawyers he hired, especially Weiss, proves that he was bias against The President, and wanted to find a crime involving him. Mueller's statement the other day proved it as well. Also if Mueller could have proven the President obstructed justice, he would have brought that out, plainly, and left it to Congress to Impeach him but he could not. Mueller and the lawyers with him could not prove any obstruction of Justice or the would stated it plainly all he did was fuel more political resistance. AG Barr simply followed the law and stated that there was no proof of the President obstructing justice. Even if he wanted to fire Mueller, who was working under his Executive Branch, because the PRESIDENT could have appointed another, unbiased, investigator to finish the investigation and one who probably would not have waisted so much time or our tax dollars. Also, the President did not fire Mueller but cooperated with investigation, was found innocent of collusion, so obstruction would be difficult, since there was no crime either.

  • 2emeraldeyes says:

    So this is pretty scary to me – So instead of being innocent until proven guilty, thanks to the Lefty Loons we are now guilty until proven innocent? The tables have turned and we're all in trouble if this is they way America is going to conduct investigations especially on a President! Watch out America here comes persecution down the road if you won't agree with deep state..

  • 2emeraldeyes says:

    And I quote from the movie Spinal Tap "Money talks and BS walks" I mean why else would Mueller come out on platform and say anything after the whole thing was already done? Think about it. Hillary is the BS BTW. .

  • To impeach, or not impeach, that is the question. Flip a coin. Heads means YES, IMPEACH! Tails means flip the coin again.

  • God_Laughs _At_Atheists says:

    Mueller knows he had nothing criminally against President Trump, so vagueness is his weapon of choice, now. The leftist fake news and the Democratic Party can read whatever they want, into it.

  • susie scottsdale ~ support your local artist says:

    If any of you think the AG is Trumps personal attorney, then you have been lulled into this “new normal “ of lowered standards of thePOTUS that is Trump since his inauguration. Either way, it’s a sad commentary of where society is now that all news can be fake news and no one knows WHAT or WHO to believe. Mainstream Media has been complicit by giving Trump oxygen by repeating his propaganda and cementing those views. If they just stuck to facts without commentary then it would be so much easier to have the truth be heard.

  • susie scottsdale ~ support your local artist says:

    So FOX NEWSFLASH is: Don’t believe Mueller Report, yet Trump is innocent and Mueller says so? Contradicting theories are common with Trumpets.

  • Logical Cynic says:

    This must be getting close to a Guinness world record. Longest butthurt following election loss, democrats will hold that one forever.

  • The idiot on the left is saying what? You are not innocent till proven guilty? Baaahahaha Fox likes to let idiots talk but it annoys me.

  • Its always the same, he says "any day of the week is obstruction…" Why do the Democrat voters not want to know what he is talking about? "Look" where? What was obstruction? firing the liar/leaker? Did Trump smash servers? How do they get away with saying nothing for so long? There was no crime! how did he obstruct?

  • Then impeach stop talking and pop your mamas tit out your mouth grow some balls and TRY to impeach him lets see where that goes I could care less either way but it will be very interesting to watch the circus lol

  • YeHoVaH my Shua says:

    Mueller investigation is the swamps smoke screen to overthrow Trump..the sacking of AG Sessions and the appointment of Barr to AG was a serious blow to the swamp plot .Mueller failed to produce witnesses that could prove criminal activity with regard to the DNC hack. the final report was to enable Democrat house to Impeach..Barr intervened by His summary…that's why the Dems and leftist Media including FOX anti Trumpers cried fowl sledging Barr.. so comes Muellers Presser to get around the Barr summary and provide Dems the excuse to Impeach…totally violating justice in the process….this is the end of the USA as a great nation if the Dems succeed…Short of arresting every never Trumper in Govt legislative branches and those in Media this country is finished as a beacon to the world

  • Andrew Gonzalez says:

    DOJ says a sitting president cannot be charged with a crime while in office in other words Mueller was running the investigation without ever considering charging Trump.

  • Ernestine Hronas says:

    Just start your arrests and prosecutions, shove all of that down their throat while they are trying to impeach an INNOCENT Of CRIME PRESIDENT!! Where is protection for the President against a "Trumped up fraudulent case." President Trump you need to charge them with Tyranny, they have no grounds for this :HARASSMENT except to take over the Government and push you out. Are you going to allow this?? I might bring to light that their "Rears & Careers" are at stake if they don't get rid of you. This has boiled down to the "Survival of the Fittest." IT IS WAR if you LOSE WE ALL LOSE.

    "

  • Sharon Watson says:

    Mueller proved he is a lying crooked partisan hack. According to Muller we are now guilty until proven innocent. How do you defend yourself against false allegations and trumped up charges? They did the same thing to Justice Kavanaugh to discredit him. Mueller also is involved in the Uranium One scandal and other government cover ups. Volume 2 of the Mueller report was a biased hit piece that omitted many facts that show that there was no obstruction but that there was an attempt to infiltrate the Trump campaign and than the Trump administration in order to undermine President Trump and his ability to be an effective leader. Declassify everything and expose all the deep state traitors and bring them to justice.

  • HEY YOU UP TO DATE SPARKIES!! YOU WHO SAY A CIVIL WAR IS IN THE MAKING!! HOW DO YOU KNOW WHO TO SHOOT? I'm trying to keep this simple in hopes you can grasp the meaning of my question.

  • Richard Cory says:

    It is far better that Barr himself reaches a conclusion which absolves the President as he has the power to do so. After all, the Attorney General's job is to represent and protect the President, just like Roy Cohn used to do all those years ago. The Attorney General has no business putting the so-called interests of the American public above those of the President so he is only doing what he was appointed to do. Why is anyone criticizing him?

  • The only reasonably, logical and legal explanation for Mueller's failure to make a determination on obstruction is that Mueller and his team were unable to dispel any and all reasonable doubts on whether one or more of the necessary elements of the crime of obstruction were established. It was incumbent upon Mueller to state this conclusion in his Report. Mueller's failure to do so can only be attributed to political considerations. This was a dereliction of duty which AG Barr was only too kind to state plainly.

  • ONE THOUSAND ATT GENERALS BOTH REPUBLICANS AND DEMS SAY TRUMP WOULD BE IN HANDCUFFS AND A ORANGE JUMPSUIT(JUST LIKE COHEN AND MANAFORT remember them)itf he were not a shitty,im mean a sitting President

  • How much clearer could Mueller have said it since you can not charge a sitting president with a crime? That is what he said. People need to listen to what is said instead of news reporters interpretation. Now play it again and listen with out any back round noise. [ since you can't hear ] Put a hearing aid in your ears.

  • What tools are needed to conquer a planet?  Divide and conquer needs different races, different religions, different cultures, etc, to create wars.  Opposing psycho drama that compete for survival and preventing harmony.  Terrorism and Terraforming to create borders of/for strife and preventing any form of freedom.  Education that prevents free thinking.  Economics to control resources that Nature (GOD) provides.  Leaders that make LAWS for the victims to follow.  Group insanity called politics to herd collective thought against individuals.  These are just some of the weapons used to conquer a planet.  Most are kept SECRET.  The biggest secret is keeping people too ignorant to understand this concept.

  • MartianSunset says:

    That was an educated guest vs an idiot. laughable Note to interviewer: never giver the last word to the idiot.

  • Vivian Clayborn says:

    It's said that Mueller and Barr are very old friends. For me to see, it seems like Mueller is going out of his way to cause, A G Barr extra trouble.

  • William Barr is the top law enforcement official in the United States of America. He has begun to make an official inquiry into what actually happened here. So far he has been
    told "some things" by those in the Democrat Party that do not add up. And he's going to find out why. Guaranteed.

  • Barr is blatantly lying, because he has said under oath in front of a congressional committee that DOA can not indict a sitting president.

  • Timothy Hansen says:

    Do you want to know the real reason Mueller left the obstruction of justice decision flapping in the wind? Because if he had said – point blank – that there wasn't either collusion OR obstruction, that would've left the Democrats & RINO's with nothing to try to use against the President. And if THAT had happened, somebody would've eventually found Mueller's head in a dumpster. Not his body, just his head.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *